Laparoscopic vs Vaginal Hysterectomy for Benign Gynaecological Disease

December 31, 2021 updated by: Hamdy Bakry Alqenawy, Ain Shams University

Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy for Benign Gynaecological Disease in Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital: A Randomized Clinical Trial

This study is designed to compare laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy in women with benign gynaecological disease in Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The current trial evaluates the performance and short-term postoperative outcomes of these two approaches for hysterectomy in Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital, a major tertiary hospital in Greater Cairo, and one of Egypt's leading centers in terms of provision of public medical service.

Eighty patients with benign indications, with no contraindications to neither laparoscopic nor vaginal approaches, were randomized into two equal groups, to undergo either of the two procedures: LH or VH.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Ain Shams University Faculty Of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women undergoing hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease (e.g., dysfunctional uterine bleeding, adenomyosis, fibroids).

Exclusion Criteria: Women with:

  • known tubo-ovarian pathology requiring primary laparotomy, e.g. large adnexal masses
  • known neoplasia requiring pelvic lymphadenectomy
  • pelvic organ prolapse requiring additional procedures, e.g., uterine procidentia (complete prolapse), enterocoele
  • conditions interfering with laparoscopic surgery, e.g. cardio-pulmonary disease, obesity (BMI 30 kg/m2 or more)
  • large uteri interfering with vaginal hysterectomy (size >16 gestational weeks)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group L
40 patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy
Laparoscopic hysterectomy following AAGL class IV E, vault closed vaginally
Active Comparator: Group V
40 patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy
Vaginal hysterectomy following Heaney technique

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operative time
Time Frame: duration of surgical procedure
Total operative time (minutes) for LH versus VH; from introduction of the first laparoscopy port or vaginal incision, till suturing the vaginal vault.
duration of surgical procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood loss
Time Frame: intra-operative
Blood loss (mL): by measuring suctioned blood (subtracting irrigation volumes), Weighing sponges (weight difference of soaked and dry surgical gauzes, 1 g ≃ 1 mL), or according to Gross (1983) formula (mL)
intra-operative
Blood transfusion
Time Frame: 24 hours post-operative
Need for blood transfusion
24 hours post-operative
Proportion of successful vaginal opportunistic salpingectomy
Time Frame: intra-operative
Proportion of patients with successful vaginal opportunistic salpingectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy compared to laparoscopic approach, and factors for non completion
intra-operative
Surgical complications
Time Frame: intra-operative
Surgical complications: visceral or vascular injuries, vaginal cuff haematoma or dehiscence
intra-operative
Post-operative pain assessed using visual analogue scale for pain intensity
Time Frame: first 24 hours post-operative
Post-operative pain: assessed using visual analogue scale for pain intensity at 2, 6 and 24 hours post-operative
first 24 hours post-operative
Febrile morbidity
Time Frame: first 24 hours post-operative
Post-operative fever (temperature assessed in degrees Celsius)
first 24 hours post-operative
Change in serum markers for inflammation
Time Frame: first 24 hours post-operative
Inflammatory response serum markers compared pre- and 24-h postoperatively (e.g. C-reactive protein or interleukin-6 according to availability)
first 24 hours post-operative
Hospital-stay
Time Frame: 1 week
Post-operative hospital-stay (hours)
1 week
Healthcare costs
Time Frame: 1 week
Healthcare costs (EGP), including consumables, medications, and admission fees.
1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 2, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 31, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • LH-VH

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Benign Gynecological Disease

Clinical Trials on LH

3
Subscribe