Troriluzole in Adult Participants With Spinocerebellar Ataxia

October 19, 2025 updated by: Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

A Phase III, Long-Term, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of Troriluzole in Adult Participants With Spinocerebellar Ataxia.

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Troriluzole (200 mg once daily) versus placebo after 48 weeks of treatment in subjects with spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

299

Phase

  • Phase 3

Expanded Access

Available outside the clinical trial. See expanded access record.

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hunan
      • Changsha, Hunan, China, 410008
        • Central South University Xiangya Hospital
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041
        • West China Hospital of Sichuan University
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85013
        • Barrow Neurological Institute
    • California
      • Long Beach, California, United States, 90806
        • CNS Trials
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • UCLA
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94158
        • UCSF
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • University of Colorado Hospital
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
        • University of Florida Health
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224
        • Mayo Clinic Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • University of South Florida
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30329
        • Emory
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • University of Chicago
      • Rolling Meadows, Illinois, United States, 60008
        • Northwest Neurology, Ltd.
    • Maryland
      • Lutherville, Maryland, United States, 21093
        • Johns Hopkins Medicine
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
        • Duke University Movement Disorders Clinic
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • University of Pennsylvania
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Houston Methodist
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98122
        • Swedish Health Services

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants with a known or suspected diagnosis of the following specific hereditary ataxias: SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, SCA6, SCA7, SCA8 and SCA10.

    1. A participant should have a confirmed genotypic diagnosis from a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) certified lab (can produce test results); or,
    2. A participant has a family member that has a confirmed genotypic diagnosis from a CLIA certified lab (can produce test results) and must be willing to undergo genetic testing to confirm underlying SCA diagnosis; or,
    3. A participant has a confirmed genotypic diagnosis from a lab that is not CLIA certified and must be willing to undergo genetic testing to confirm underlying SCA diagnosis; or,
    4. A participant has clinical evidence that supports diagnosis of one of the aforementioned SCA genotypes but does not have producible test results from a CLIA certified lab from either a family member or for his or herself and the participant must be willing to undergo such testing to confirm the SCA diagnosis (in this case, site must wait for results of genotypic testing prior to randomization)
  2. Ability to ambulate 8 meters without human assistance (canes and other devices allowed)
  3. Screening Modified Functional Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (f-SARA) total score ≥3.
  4. Score of ≥1 on gait subsection of the f-SARA
  5. Determined by the investigator to be medically stable at Baseline/randomization as assessed by medical history, physical examination, laboratory test results, and electrocardiogram testing.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. A ≥ 2-point difference on the Modified Functional SARA score between screening and baseline
  2. Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) score <24
  3. Any medical condition other than one of the hereditary ataxias specified in the inclusion criteria that could predominantly explain or contribute significantly to the participants' symptoms of ataxia.
  4. A prominent spasticity or dystonia that, in the opinion of the investigator, will compromise the ability of the SARA instrument to assess underlying ataxia severity.
  5. A score of 4 on any individual item (Items 1-4) of the f-SARA
  6. Participants should be excluded at screening or baseline if medical conditions have arisen or there is a change in disease status that could confound the ability of the SARA to accurately reflect changes in ataxia severity.
  7. Active liver disease or a history of hepatic intolerance to medications that in the investigator's judgment, is medically significant.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Troriluzole

Randomization phase (Randomization through Week 48):

Participants received starting dose of troriluzole 140 milligrams (mg) capsules orally once daily for first 4 weeks, followed by 200 mg once daily for the remaining 44 weeks of 48-week duration of the double-blind randomization phase.

Open-label extension (OLE) phase (OLE Week 1 up to Week 192): Participants who were eligible and agreed to enroll in an OLE phase, will receive troriluzole 200 mg capsules orally once daily for 4 weeks in a blinded manner. After OLE Week 4, all participants will then receive open label troriluzole 200 mg up to Week 192.

Administered orally
Placebo Comparator: Placebo

Randomization phase (Randomization through Week 48):

Participants received troriluzole matching placebo capsules orally once daily for 48 weeks duration of the double-blind randomization phase.

OLE phase (Week 1 up to Week 192): Participants who were eligible and agreed to enroll in an OLE phase, will receive troriluzole 140 mg capsules orally once daily for the first 4 weeks in a blinded manner. After OLE Week 4, all participants will then receive open label troriluzole 200 mg up to Week 192.

Administered orally
Administered orally

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Randomization Phase: Change From Baseline in the Modified Functional Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (f-SARA) Total Score at Week 48 in SCA Participants
Time Frame: Randomization Baseline; Week 48
The f-SARA was a 4-item performance based scale: 1-gait, 2-stance, 3-sitting, 4-speech disturbance (0:normal (no impairment), 1: mildly impaired function, but no assistance required, 2: moderately impaired function, but needs assistance for certain parts of task, 3: severely impaired function to degree that assistance is needed for all parts of the task, 4: unable to perform function). Total score was derived as sum of individual items; ranged from 0 to 16. Higher score indicated worst outcome. A negative change in score showed improvement.
Randomization Baseline; Week 48

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Randomization Phase: Change From Baseline in Patient Impression of Function and Activities of Daily Living Scale (PIFAS) Total Score at Week 48 in SCA Participants
Time Frame: Randomization Baseline, Week 48
PIFAS was a 17-item instrument designed to assess the level of functional disability. The scale was rater administered and the items were selected to encompass domains of relevance to SCA (i.e., mobility, speech/swallowing, and fatigue), and to capture function and activities of daily living within these domains. Statements were rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "0" reflecting "not at all" to "4" reflecting "very much." The total score was derived as the sum of the individual items, ranged between 0 to 68. Higher score indicated a worst outcome. A negative change in score showed improvement.
Randomization Baseline, Week 48
Randomization Phase: Change From Baseline in Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale - Activities of Daily Living (FARS-ADL) Total Score at Week 48 in SCA Participants
Time Frame: Randomization Baseline, Week 48
FARS was a scale consisting of combined timed measures of performance, FUNC (0-6, higher score indicated worst outcome), ADL with paramount neurologic examination (0-36, higher score indicated worst outcome), FARSn (0-125, higher score indicated worst outcome). Total score was sum of these 3 subscales: 0-167, higher score indicated worst outcome. For this outcome measure, only FARS-ADL sub-scale was evaluated. It was multicomponent scale designed to assess neurological domains affected in Friedreich's Ataxia, another hereditary cerebellar ataxia disorder. This subscale had been validated in Friedreich's ataxia, was a measure of functional disability, and correlated with SARA total scores. It assessed 9 areas of ADL with response categories rated on 5-point scale with "0" reflecting "normal" and "4" reflecting inability to perform specific function. Total score was derived as sum of individual items, ranging 0-36, higher score indicated worst outcome. FARS-ADL was rater administered.
Randomization Baseline, Week 48
Randomization Phase: Change From Baseline in Functional Staging for Ataxia Scale From the Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS-FUNC) Total Score at Week 48 in SCA Participants
Time Frame: Randomization Baseline, Week 48

FARS was a scale consisting of combined timed measures of performance, FUNC (0-6, higher score indicated worst outcome), ADL with paramount neurologic examination (0-36, higher score indicated worst outcome), FARSn (0-125, higher score indicated worst outcome). The total score was a sum of these 3 subscales; 0-167, higher score indicated worst outcome.

For this outcome measure, only the FARS-FUNC sub-scale was evaluated. FARS-FUNC was a subscale of the FARS designed to provide functional staging for ataxia in which clinicians were asked to assess function on a 6-stage staging system, with "0" reflecting "normal" and "6" reflecting a stage in participant was "total disabled".

Randomization Baseline, Week 48
Randomization Phase: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs); and AEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
Time Frame: From first dose of study drug to Week 48 plus 30 days (maximum duration: 52 weeks)
An AE was defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition in a participant that did not necessarily had a causal relationship with this treatment. An SAE was defined as any AE that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of the participant or was considered another important medical event. Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) in the randomization phase included any AE with an onset date on or after the first day of double-blind study drug and up to the first day of open-label study drug in the extension phase (for participants entering the extension phase) or last day of the randomization phase study drug + 30 days.
From first dose of study drug to Week 48 plus 30 days (maximum duration: 52 weeks)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Randomization Phase: Change From Baseline in the f-SARA Total Score at Week 48 in SCA3 Participants
Time Frame: Randomization Baseline; Week 48
The f-SARA was a 4-item performance based scale: 1-gait, 2-stance, 3-sitting, 4-speech disturbance (0:normal (no impairment), 1:mildly impaired function, but no assistance required, 2:moderately impaired function, but needs assistance for certain parts of task, 3: severely impaired function to degree that assistance is needed for all parts of the task, 4:unable to perform function). Total score was derived as sum of individual items; ranged from 0 to 16. Higher score indicated worst outcome. A negative change in score shows improvement.
Randomization Baseline; Week 48
Randomization Phase: Change From Baseline in PIFAS Total Score at Week 48 in SCA3 Participants
Time Frame: Randomization Baseline, Week 48
PIFAS was a 17-item instrument designed to assess the level of functional disability. The scale is rater administered and the items were selected to encompass domains of relevance to SCA (i.e., mobility, speech/swallowing, and fatigue), and to capture function and activities of daily living within these domains. Statements are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "0" reflecting "not at all" to "4" reflecting "very much." The total score is derived as the sum of the individual items, ranged between 0 to 68. Higher score indicated a worst outcome. A negative change in score showed improvement.
Randomization Baseline, Week 48
Randomization Phase: Change From Baseline in FARS-ADL Total Score at Week 48 in SCA3 Participants
Time Frame: Randomization Baseline, Week 48
FARS was a scale consisting of combined timed measures of performance, FUNC (0-6, higher score indicated worst outcome), ADL with paramount neurologic examination (0-36, higher score indicated worst outcome), FARSn (0-125, higher score indicated worst outcome). Total score was sum of these 3 subscales: 0-167, higher score indicated worst outcome. For this outcome measure, only FARS-ADL sub-scale was evaluated. It was multicomponent scale designed to assess neurological domains affected in Friedreich's Ataxia, another hereditary cerebellar ataxia disorder. This subscale had been validated in Friedreich's ataxia, was a measure of functional disability, and correlated with SARA total scores. It assessed 9 areas of ADL with response categories rated on 5-point scale with "0" reflecting "normal" and "4" reflecting inability to perform specific function. Total score was derived as sum of individual items, ranging 0-36, higher score indicated worst outcome. FARS-ADL was rater administered.
Randomization Baseline, Week 48
Randomization Phase: Change From Baseline in FARS-FUNC Total Score at Week 48 in SCA3 Participants
Time Frame: Randomization Baseline, Week 48

FARS was a scale consisting of combined timed measures of performance, FUNC (0-6, higher score indicated worst outcome), ADL with paramount neurologic examination (0-36, higher score indicated worst outcome), FARSn (0-125, higher score indicated worst outcome). The total score was a sum of these 3 subscales; 0-167, higher score indicated worst outcome.

For this outcome measure, only the FARS-FUNC sub-scale was evaluated. FARS-FUNC was a subscale of the FARS designed to provide functional staging for ataxia in which clinicians were asked to assess function on a 6-stage staging system, with "0" reflecting "normal" and "6" reflecting a stage in participant was "total disabled".

Randomization Baseline, Week 48
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement Scale (CGI-I) in SCA3 Participants
Time Frame: Randomization Baseline; Week 48
The CGI-I was a 7-point scale that required the clinician to assess how much the participant's illness had improved or worsened relative to the baseline visit and it was rated on a 7 point scale: 1= "Very much improved", 2= "Much improved", 3= "Minimally improved", 4= "No change", 5= "Minimally worse", 6= "Much worse" and 7= "Very much worse". Higher scores indicated greater impairment.
Randomization Baseline; Week 48
Falls Events in Troriluzole Compared to Placebo for All SCA Participants
Time Frame: Randomization Baseline, Week 48
An AE of Fall was recorded if there was a worsening of frequency of falls or if a fall was associated with an injury.
Randomization Baseline, Week 48

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 8, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 18, 2022

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe