Evaluation of the New Laser PHOTOLASE PLV-585nm for the Treatment of Rosacea (ROSAPHOTOLASE)

February 28, 2022 updated by: University Hospital, Lille

A Single-blinded, Monocentric, Randomized Pilot Study, to Evaluate the Yellow Laser PHOTOLASE PLV-585nm Versus the Reference Green Laser (KTP Excel V 532 nm) in the Treatment of Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea

Rosacea is a frequent dermatological condition, with a chronic and disturbing evolution that is characterized by redness, permanent erythema associated with telangiectasia (visible and permanent dilatation of the small vessels). It frequently affects men and women with fair skin and can have significant psycho-emotional consequences.

To counteract the unaesthetic appearance of redness and eliminate telangiectasia, the use of the laser is proposed to the patient.

This study is a single center prospective, randomized, controlled split face study to compare 532nm KTP laser versus 585 nm PLV Laser in terms of improvement of the symptoms in the treatment of Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea 20 subjects will receive up to 3 laser treatments at day 0, month 2 and 4 and will be followed at month 6 and 12.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Adult male and female subjects 18 years of age or older will participate in the study after the objectives, methods, and potential risks of the study have been explained, and after they have signed the informed consent form.

Patients will come to the investigation center for a maximum of 6 visits.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lille, France, 59037
        • Hop Claude Huriez Chu Lille

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fitzpatrick Skin Type I - III
  • Post-menopausal or surgically sterilized, or using a medically acceptable form of birth control at least 3 months prior to enrolment and during the entire course of the study.
  • Clinical diagnosis of Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea stade II
  • Homogeneous extend and staining telangiectasia in each half face
  • Patient never treated with laser for Rosacea
  • Patient doesn't wish to use systemic corticosteroids or retinoids; or topical corticosteroids or retinoids on the treated area.
  • Patient agreeing to have limited exposure to the sun and use of a protective screen (index 50 or higher) every day of the study and throughout its duration if it takes place from May to September.
  • Patient must be able to read, understand and sign the Informed Consent Form
  • Patient able to adhere to the program of visits of the study and the other imperatives of the protocol
  • Patient accepting to have photographs taken on the face
  • Quality of social insurance or social security entitlement

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant and/or breastfeeding woman or childbearing age without effective contraception
  • Alcohol abuse assessed at the discretion of the investigator
  • History of prior laser or light based procedures for any other pathology for the face within 6 months of study participation Fitzpatrick Type IV à VI
  • Systemic use of isotretinoin in the 6 months prior to inclusion in the study.
  • Topical use of retinoids and / or corticosteroids in the 4 weeks prior to inclusion in the study.
  • Patient under photo sensitization treatment
  • Patient suffering from significant concurrent illness such as type 1 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, uncontrolled hypertension, neurological disease, lupus erythematosus, scleroderma.
  • Patient subject to hypertrophic or abnormal scarring
  • Patient presenting or having a malignant tumor or skin cancer in the area to be treated.
  • Having a known anticoagulative condition or taking prescription anticoagulation medications.
  • Participation to another clinical study involving a laser or drug within three months of inclusion in the study.
  • Smoker or former smoker in the 12 months prior to inclusion in the study.
  • Patient with excessive tattoos in the area to be treated and / or wishing to tattoo the treated area during the study.
  • Patient treated for cancer by chemotherapy or radiotherapy
  • Patient with hyper or hypo pigmentation
  • Patient unable to understand protocol or give consent
  • Legal incapacity (persons deprived of their liberty or under guardianship or curatorship)
  • Patient in emergency or in detention
  • Clinical follow-up impossible for psychological, family matters, social or geographical reasons

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 532nm KTP Laser
Cutera® Excel V 532 nm Application of light spots 5 to 7 mm for a pulse duration of 8 to 20 ms and a fluence of 7.4 to 10 J / cm2.
Each subject's face will be divided in half and labeled as A (Right Side of the Face) or B (Left Side of Face). The allocation of active comparator and experimental treatment arms will be determined by randomization
Experimental: 585 nm yellow laser
PHOTOLASE PLV 585 nm Application of light spots 1.4mm for a pulse duration of 10 to 100 ms and a fluence of 0 to 65 J / cm2.
Each subject's face will be divided in half and labeled as A (Right Side of the Face) or B (Left Side of Face). The allocation of active comparator and experimental treatment arms will be determined by randomization

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Degree of improvement in Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea
Time Frame: at Month 2

Measured, for each treatment arm, based on blinded physician assessment of subject photographs using the 7 points Telangiectasia Grading Score.

(-1 = Aggravation of telangiectasia, 0 = no change, 1 = poor improvement (<25% decrease), 2 = intermediate improvement (25-50% decrease), 3 significant improvement (50-75% decrease), 4 = very significant improvement (75-99% decrease), 5 = complete improvement (100% decrease)

at Month 2

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Degree of improvement in Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea evaluated by a blinded physician.
Time Frame: at Month 4, 6,12
Measured, for each treatment arm, based on subject photographs using the 7 points Telangiectasia Grading Score
at Month 4, 6,12
Measures of skin reaction for each treatment arm
Time Frame: At baseline, At Month 2, At Month 4 (if realized)
Measured with a 4 points scale : no reaction, low, moderate and severe reaction
At baseline, At Month 2, At Month 4 (if realized)
Pain evaluation during each treatment
Time Frame: At baseline, At Month 2, At Month 4 (if realized)
Mosby Pain Rating Scale for each treatment arm
At baseline, At Month 2, At Month 4 (if realized)
Change in lesion skin color in each treatment arm
Time Frame: At Baseline, at Month 2, 4, 6,12
Measured with Chroma-Meter CR400 (Konica Minolta), Mean a* value
At Baseline, at Month 2, 4, 6,12
Subject satisfaction level
Time Frame: At Month 6,12
Comparison of each treatment arm using Subject Overall Evolution Scale
At Month 6,12
Change in Life Quality
Time Frame: At Selection, at Baseline, at Month 2, 4 (if realized), 6,12
Comparison of Dermatology Life Quality Index
At Selection, at Baseline, at Month 2, 4 (if realized), 6,12
Practitioner's opinion
Time Frame: At baseline, At Month 2, At Month 4 (if realized)
Comparison, for each treatment arm, of comfort of use, practicality, duration of treatment
At baseline, At Month 2, At Month 4 (if realized)
Adverse Events
Time Frame: At Baseline, At Month 2, 4, 6,12
Incidence and severity of adverse effects, for each treatment arm, during the study period
At Baseline, At Month 2, 4, 6,12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cyril MAIRE, MD, University Hospital, Lille
  • Study Director: Serge MORDON, Pr, Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 8, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 14, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

September 14, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2017_57
  • 2018-A01904-51 (Other Identifier: ID-RCB number, ANSM)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea

Clinical Trials on Excel V 532nm (KTP) green Laser

Subscribe