Pulsed Dye Laser and Intense Pulsed Light Configured With Different Wavelength Bands in Improving Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Pulsed Dye Laser and Intense Pulsed Light Configured With Different Wavelength Bands in the Treatment of Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea

Pulsed dye laser(PDL) and intense pulsed light(IPL) has been widely used in improving rosacea. To compare the efficacy and safety of PDL and IPL configured with different wavelength bands(Delicate Pulsed Light, M22 590, M22 vascular filter) in the treatment of rosacea, we designed a prospective, randomized controlled trial. We hope to make a comparison between PDL and IPL,between broad-spectrum IPL and narrow-spectrum IPL, between single-band IPL and dual-band IPL, and also provide clinical basis for clinicians and patients to develop individualized treatment plans.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rosacea is a chronic skin condition characterized by erythema, inflammatory papules, pustules and telangiectasias, which typically occur on the face of middle-aged adults, especially fair skinned. The disease can lead to social stigmatization and may significantly reduce the quality of life of patients. For erythematous lesions and telangiectasia, intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy and lasers are popular treatmen option. Lasers and non-coherent intense pulse light sources (IPL) are based on the principle of selective photothermolysis. The target chromophore in vascular lesions is the oxyhemoglobin present in the red blood corpuscles (RBCs) which circulates in the blood vessels. Pulsed dye lasers (PDL) use a wavelength of 595 nm and is the gold standard of vascular lesion treatment. A common complication is post treatment purpura which appears immediately and can last for 7-14 days, which may be cosmetically unacceptable. The intense pulsed light (IPL) produces a non-coherent light beam with a spectrum of wavelengths from 500 to 1200 nm. Cut-off filters at 515, 550, 570, 590 nm are used for vascular lesions. To compare the efficacy and safety of PDL and IPL configured with different wavelength bands(Delicate Pulsed Light, M22 590, M22 vascular filter) in the treatment of rosacea, we designed a prospective, randomized controlled trial. We hope to make a comparison between PDL and IPL,between broad-spectrum IPL and narrow-spectrum IPL, between single-band IPL and dual-band IPL, and also provide clinical basis for clinicians and patients to develop individualized treatment plans.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Zhejiang
      • Hanzhou, Zhejiang, China, 0571
        • Recruiting
        • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University of Medicine
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

age of at least 18 years; according to the rosacea diagnostic criteria established by the NRSEC in 2002, be diagnosed as erythematotelangiectatic rosacea; Rosacea clinical score is between 9 and 12; Fitzpatrick skin type III and IV;

Exclusion Criteria:

there was infection in the treatment site sunburn history within 1 month; received oral isotretinoin or laser treatment in the past 3 months received chemical peeling 1 month before the study pregnancy or breast-feeding. those who are receiving other treatment for rosacea, such as topical and oral drugs;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pulsed dye laser(PDL)
The patients were randomly categorized into the following four groups based on the treatments they received: PDL, DPL, M22 590, M22 vascular filter
One subject was treated with pulsed dye laser (Vbeam platinum, 595 nm, Candela Corporation): energy dosages of 9-11 J/cm2, pulse durations of 10/20 ms, and spot size of 7 mm.
Experimental: IPL(Delicate Pulsed Light)
The patients were randomly categorized into the following four groups based on the treatments they received: PDL, DPL, M22 590, M22 vascular filter
One subject was treated with IPL(delicate Pulsed Light, Dye-VL, Alma Lasers Corporation): energy dosages of 8.4-10.6 J/cm2, pulse durations of 10/12 ms, and spot size of 10×30 mm.
Experimental: IPL(M22 590)
The patients were randomly categorized into the following four groups based on the treatments they received: PDL, DPL, M22 590, M22 vascular filter
One subject was treated with IPL(M22 590, 590-1200nm, Lumenis Limited): energy dosages of 15-18 J/cm2, pulse durations of 3-4 ms, pulse delay of 30-40 ms, and spot size of 15×35 mm.
Experimental: IPL(M22 vascular filter)
The patients were randomly categorized into the following four groups based on the treatments they received: PDL, DPL, M22 590, M22 vascular filter
One subject was treated with IPL(M22 vascular, 530-650nm and 900-1200nm, Lumenis Limited): energy dosages of 9-17 J/cm2, pulse durations of 4-6 ms, pulse delay of 20-40 ms, and spot size of 15×35 mm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rosacea clinical score
Time Frame: from baseline(T0) to 4weeks after the final treatment(T3)
It includes objective symptom score(Flushing, Nontransient erythema, Telangiectasia) and subjective symptom score(Burning or stinging, Itching, Dry), with a 4-level score according to the standard grading system by NRS. Objective symptom is assessed by a dermatologist, and subjective symptom score is assessed by subjects themselves.
from baseline(T0) to 4weeks after the final treatment(T3)
VISIA Red Area score
Time Frame: from baseline(T0) to 4weeks after the final treatment(T3)
using VISIA image system to record red area absolute score
from baseline(T0) to 4weeks after the final treatment(T3)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain score
Time Frame: immediately after each laser treatment
It is evaluated by subjects themselves with Visual analogue scale(VAS) , on a scale hypopigmentation were recorded.
immediately after each laser treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
adverse effects
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 0.5 year
Adverse reactions such as pain, erythema and edema, hyperpigmentation and hypopigmentation were recorded.
through study completion, an average of 0.5 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Suiqing S Cai, doctor, 2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 27, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2022-0177

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Since the individual participant data(IPD) is personal information, our participants are unwilling to share. But we welcome any questions through emails.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea

Clinical Trials on PDL(595nm)

Subscribe