Supporting the Mental Health Workforce

Local Organizational Support and Development Networks for Public Mental Health System Workforce With Lived Experience

Emotional Health Association will engage Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health providers that employ peer workers in a training and technical assistance intervention designed to support, increase, and retain an effective peer workforce. This intervention consists of a Co-Learning Collaborative, several training sessions, and the creation of Implementation Teams. Peer workers will also be encouraged to attend Recovery International, an established network of self-help support groups for mental health. Dr. Louis Brown will lead an evaluation of the efficacy of the intervention. This study will inform the use of peer workers as a component of the mental health workforce.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Mental Health
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Mental Health Peer Workforce Support

Detailed Description

Evaluation of the the intervention with the peer workforce will be conducted through administration of web-based surveys of peer workers and peer supervisors at baseline and follow-up (10 months post-baseline). These two surveys will be administered to peer workers and peer supervisors at sites enrolled in the study. A letter of informational detailing the risks of participation will accompany the survey. Individuals who do not complete the web-based survey will be invited to complete a telephone interview with the same questions. Sites (where one or more peer supervisors and peer workers are located) will be randomized to either the intervention group or standard practice control group. The intervention group will engage in Co-Learning Collaborative, several training sessions, and the creation of Implementation Teams. Peer workers from the intervention group will also be encouraged to attend Recovery International, an established network of self-help support groups for mental health. Analysis of the surveys collected from both study groups will be conducted to assess the efficacy of the intervention and provide Emotional Health Association with a final report.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 366
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • California
    • Culver City, California, United States, 90230
      • SHARE! Self-Help and Recovery Exchance

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• All service providing sites within the Los Angeles Department of Mental Health will be invited to participate in the study. Sites not affiliated with the Los Angeles Department of Mental Health will be allowed to enroll in the study if they express interest but will not be actively recruited.
• Participants must be a peer worker or supervisor of peer workers at a site participating in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Peers who do not receive pay and volunteer for less that 15 hours per week.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mental Health Peer Workforce Support; Sites assigned to this group will engage in Co-Learning Collaborative, several trainings, and the creation of Implementation Teams--all part of the intervention and designed to support their peer workforce.	Behavioral: Mental Health Peer Workforce Support; Supervisors and peer workers will participate in trainings covering effective peer services, trauma-informed effective peer supervision, and responsibilities of peer workers in a supervising relationship. A monthly Supervisors of Peer Workers meeting will support site change efforts. Sites will create an implementation team to work within their site to implement the training received. Peer Workers will enroll in a peer mentoring program, where they serve as peer mentors matched with fellow peer mentors. Recovery International and the Los Angeles Department of Mental Health will encourage peer workers to attend Recovery International meetings. Emotional Health Association will refer Peer Workers and their Supervisors in the intervention group to self-help support groups that reduce stress and increase resiliency.
No Intervention: Control Group; Sites assigned to this group will continue practice as usual and not receive any additional peer worker training or technical assistance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Peer-supportive organizational climate	Peer-supportive organizational climate will be assessed by a set of 6 likert-scale questions that asks about the participant about his/her organization's administrative leadership and the support they provide. 1= Strongly Disagree (with positive statement about organization) 7= Strongly Disagree (with positive statement about organization)	10 months
Mental Health Stigma	This outcome will be assessed by asking the peer supervisor a set of 15 likert-scale questions about their feelings towards individuals with mental health issues. 1= Strongly Disagree 5= Strongly Agree	10 months
Peer Worker Recovery	This outcome will be assessed by a set of 24 likert scale questions that ask the participants how they feel about themselves and their lives. 1= Strongly Disagree (with positive statement about self) 5= Strongly Agree (with positive statement about self)	10 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Recovery orientation of services	This outcome will be measured with 4 questions that ask the peer workers to rate their level of agreement with statements about their organization's treatment of service users (or clients) 1= Strongly Disagree (with positive statement about services) 7= Strongly Agree (with positive statement about services)	10 Months
Supervisor's peer support attitudes	This outcome will be assessed by asking the peer supervisor a set of three likert-scale questions about the importance of peer support for mental health services. 1=Not important at all 10 =Extremely Important	10 Months
Supervisor's job satisfaction	This outcome will be measured using one likert-scale question that asks how satisfied the supervisors are with their job- from 1 (highly unsatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied).	10 Months
Supervision quality (as rated by peer workers)	This outcome will be assessed with a set of 7 likert scale questions that ask about the peer worker's experience with their supervisor. 1= Strongly Disagree (with positive statement about supervisor) 7= Strongly Agree (with positive statement about supervisor)	10 Months
Peer worker time spent on peer support activities	This outcome will be measured by asking the peer workers to rate how much time they spend on 9 different support activities on a typical week-- from "None" to "40 hours plus".	10 Months
Peer worker discrimination experience	This will be measured with a set of 5 likert scale questions that asks the peer worker about their experience with discrimination due to their mental health. 1= Strongly Disagree (with statement about negative experience) 5= Strongly Agree (with statement about negative experience)	10 Months
Supervisor/peer worker relationship (as rated by supervisor)	This outcome will be measured by a set of 12 likert scale questions from the Supervisory Relationship Measure developed by Pearce et al. 2012. 1= Strongly Disagree (with positive statement about peer worker) 5= Strongly Agree (with positive statement about peer worker)	10 Months
Peer worker contributions (as rated by supervisor)	This outcome will be measured by a set of 12 likert scale questions. 1= Strongly Disagree 7= Strongly Agree	10 Months
Peer worker job satisfaction	This outcome will be measured using one likert-scale question that asks how satisfied the peer workers are with their job- from 1 ("highly unsatisfied") to 5 ("very satisfied").	10 Months
Peer worker sick leave and disability days	This outcome will be measured with the following question from the Stapelfeldt et al 2012 instrument: "How many sick leave or disability days has _____ had within the last 6 months?"	10 Months
Peer worker work-related burnout	This will assesses with a set of 7 likert scale questions that ask the peer worker for the frequency of certain experiences at their job. 1= Always 5= Never/Almost Never	10 Months
Peer worker mental health problems	This outcome will be assessed by a set of 27 likert-scale questions that asks the participant how frequent they have experienced feelings of distress in the past 30 days. 1= Not all (pertaining to negative statement) 5= Extremely (pertaining to negative statement)	10 Months
Peer worker social support	This outcome will be assessed by having the peer workers answer some questions about the people in their environment who provide them with help or support. 1= Very satisfied (with specific person's support) 6= Very dissatisfied (with specific person's support)	10 Months
Peer worker stress	This outcome will be measured by a set of 6 likert scale questions that ask the peer worker to rate the frequency that they have had stressful experiences in the past 30 days. 1= Never (pertaining to negative statement) 5= Very Often (pertaining to negative statement)	10 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
• Collaborators: Emotional Health Association; California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Louis D Brown, PhD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): October 23, 2018
• Primary Completion (Actual): January 7, 2020
• Study Completion (Actual): January 7, 2020

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: October 12, 2018
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 16, 2018
• First Posted (Actual): October 17, 2018

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): April 10, 2024
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 9, 2024
• Last Verified: April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Other Study ID Numbers: HSC-SPH-18-0357

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No