Enhancing Acupuncture Treatment Effect Through Non-invasive Neuromodulation

October 21, 2025 updated by: Jian Kong, Massachusetts General Hospital
In this study, investigators will examine the brain mechanism behind the synergistic effects of combining acupuncture and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) treatments. Specifically, chronic low back pain (cLBP) patients will be recruited and randomized to one of four groups (30 per group, one month of treatment): 1) verum acupuncture + real tDCS, 2) sham acupuncture + real tDCS, 3) verum acupuncture + sham tDCS, and 4) sham acupuncture + sham tDCS. Investigators will study 1) the longitudinal (one-month) effects of different treatments as indicated by changes in resting state functional connectivity (rsFC), cerebral blood flow (CBF), clinical outcomes of low back pain, and quantitative sensory test (QST) and 2) the association between these changes.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

116

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States, 02129-2020
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • volunteers 18-60 years of age
  • meet the classification criteria of chronic low back pain (having low back pain for more than 6 months), as determined by the referring physician
  • at least 4/10 clinical pain on the 11-point Low Back Pain Numeric Rating Scale (LBP NRS)
  • at least a 10th grade English-reading level; English can be a second language provided that the patients understand all questions used in the assessment measures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of epilepsy or loss consciousness (LOC)
  • specific causes of back pain (e.g. cancer, fractures, spinal stenosis, infections)
  • complicated back problems (e.g. prior back surgery, medicolegal issues)
  • the intent to undergo surgery during the time of involvement in the study
  • history of cardiac, respiratory, or nervous system disease that, in the investigator's judgment, precludes participation in the study because of a heightened potential for adverse outcomes. For example: asthma or claustrophobia
  • presence of any contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning. For example: cardiac pacemaker, metal implants, claustrophobia, pregnancy, inability to remain still in MRI scanner
  • history of medical or psychiatric illness as determined by the investigator
  • history of substance abuse or dependence

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: verum acupuncture + real tDCS
Participants will receive real acupuncture treatment.
Participants will receive real transcranial direct current stimulation.
Experimental: sham acupuncture + real tDCS
Participants will receive real transcranial direct current stimulation.
Participants will receive sham acupuncture treatment.
Experimental: verum acupuncture + sham tDCS
Participants will receive real acupuncture treatment.
Participants will receive sham transcranial direct current stimulation.
Sham Comparator: sham acupuncture + sham tDCS
Participants will receive sham acupuncture treatment.
Participants will receive sham transcranial direct current stimulation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Periaqueductal Gray (PAG) Resting State Functional Connectivity (rsFC) Changes
Time Frame: difference between Day 1 (pre-intervention); post-intervention at Week 4 (pre-intervention - Post-intervention)
We investigated whether tDCS and acupuncture treatments modulate resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) of the periaqueductal gray (PAG). This was evaluated by comparing pre- and post-treatment MRI scans. In this report, we focused on the rsFC between the PAG and the rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC, peak MNI coordinate (2, 38, 12) with a 2-mm radius sphere). Functional connectivity values were computed as Pearson's correlation coefficients between the mean time series of predefined regions of interest (ROIs). To improve normality and enable parametric statistical analysis, these correlation coefficients (r) were converted to Fisher z values using the transformation z = 0.5 × ln[(1 + r) / (1 - r)]. Higher Fisher z values indicate stronger positive connectivity, whereas lower values indicate weaker or negative connectivity. Changes in Fisher z values from baseline to post-intervention reflect the degree and direction of connectivity modulation.
difference between Day 1 (pre-intervention); post-intervention at Week 4 (pre-intervention - Post-intervention)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Outcomes as Measured by LBP Intensity Scores
Time Frame: Difference between the Day 1 (pre-intervention) and post-intervention at Week 4 (post-intervention - pre-intervention)
The Low Back Pain Numeric Rating Scale (LBP NRS) is a standardized adaptation of the Pain Numeric Rating Scale for assessing pain intensity specifically related to the lower back. It uses an 11-point scale from 0 ("no low back pain") to 10 ("worst low back pain imaginable"), allowing patients to rate their pain over the past week.
Difference between the Day 1 (pre-intervention) and post-intervention at Week 4 (post-intervention - pre-intervention)
Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF) Differences Before and After Treatments
Time Frame: Day 1 (pre-intervention); post-intervention at Week 4
Investigators will examine Cerebral blood flow (CBF) changes before and after treatment in several pain-related brain areas. Cerebral blood flow represents the volume of blood delivered to brain tissue per unit time, CBF data will be collected during arterial spin labeling (ASL) scans that will take place before the first treatment and after the last treatment. Images from these scans will be aggregated to an average CBF-weighted image to be used for analysis. In this report, we focused on bilateral postcentral Gyrus (MNI coordinate: +/-18, -34, 56, 2 mm sphere)
Day 1 (pre-intervention); post-intervention at Week 4
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Differences
Time Frame: Day 1 (pre-intervention); post-intervention at Week 4 (pre-intervention - post-intervention)
Participants' quantitative sensory testing (QST) ratings were analyzed before and after all treatments. Here, we report the heat pain threshold measured around the affected lower back area.
Day 1 (pre-intervention); post-intervention at Week 4 (pre-intervention - post-intervention)
Primary Motor Cortex (M1) rsFC Changes Before and After 4-week Treatments
Time Frame: Day 1 (pre-intervention); post-intervention at Week 4 (pre-intervention - post-intervention)

We investigated whether tDCS and acupuncture treatments modulate resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) of the M1. This was evaluated by comparing pre- and post-treatment MRI scans. In this report, we focused on the rsFC between the PAG and the rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC), using a seed defined by the rACC peak MNI coordinate (0, 34, 20) with a 2-mm radius sphere.

Functional connectivity values were computed as Pearson's correlation coefficients between the mean time series of predefined regions of interest (ROIs). To improve normality and enable parametric statistical analysis, these correlation coefficients (r) were converted to Fisher z values using the transformation z = 0.5 × ln[(1 + r) / (1 - r)]. Higher Fisher z values indicate stronger positive connectivity, whereas lower values indicate weaker or negative connectivity. Changes in Fisher z values from baseline to post-intervention

Day 1 (pre-intervention); post-intervention at Week 4 (pre-intervention - post-intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 7, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 18, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 5, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2018P001970

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on verum acupuncture

Subscribe