- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03716830
Enhancing Acupuncture Treatment Effect Through Non-invasive Neuromodulation
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States, 02129-2020
- Massachusetts General Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- volunteers 18-60 years of age
- meet the classification criteria of chronic low back pain (having low back pain for more than 6 months), as determined by the referring physician
- at least 4/10 clinical pain on the 11-point Low Back Pain Numeric Rating Scale (LBP NRS)
- at least a 10th grade English-reading level; English can be a second language provided that the patients understand all questions used in the assessment measures
Exclusion Criteria:
- history of epilepsy or loss consciousness (LOC)
- specific causes of back pain (e.g. cancer, fractures, spinal stenosis, infections)
- complicated back problems (e.g. prior back surgery, medicolegal issues)
- the intent to undergo surgery during the time of involvement in the study
- history of cardiac, respiratory, or nervous system disease that, in the investigator's judgment, precludes participation in the study because of a heightened potential for adverse outcomes. For example: asthma or claustrophobia
- presence of any contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning. For example: cardiac pacemaker, metal implants, claustrophobia, pregnancy, inability to remain still in MRI scanner
- history of medical or psychiatric illness as determined by the investigator
- history of substance abuse or dependence
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: verum acupuncture + real tDCS
|
Participants will receive real acupuncture treatment.
Participants will receive real transcranial direct current stimulation.
|
|
Experimental: sham acupuncture + real tDCS
|
Participants will receive real transcranial direct current stimulation.
Participants will receive sham acupuncture treatment.
|
|
Experimental: verum acupuncture + sham tDCS
|
Participants will receive real acupuncture treatment.
Participants will receive sham transcranial direct current stimulation.
|
|
Sham Comparator: sham acupuncture + sham tDCS
|
Participants will receive sham acupuncture treatment.
Participants will receive sham transcranial direct current stimulation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Periaqueductal Gray (PAG) Resting State Functional Connectivity (rsFC) Changes
Time Frame: difference between Day 1 (pre-intervention); post-intervention at Week 4 (pre-intervention - Post-intervention)
|
We investigated whether tDCS and acupuncture treatments modulate resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) of the periaqueductal gray (PAG).
This was evaluated by comparing pre- and post-treatment MRI scans.
In this report, we focused on the rsFC between the PAG and the rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC, peak MNI coordinate (2, 38, 12) with a 2-mm radius sphere).
Functional connectivity values were computed as Pearson's correlation coefficients between the mean time series of predefined regions of interest (ROIs).
To improve normality and enable parametric statistical analysis, these correlation coefficients (r) were converted to Fisher z values using the transformation z = 0.5 × ln[(1 + r) / (1 - r)].
Higher Fisher z values indicate stronger positive connectivity, whereas lower values indicate weaker or negative connectivity.
Changes in Fisher z values from baseline to post-intervention reflect the degree and direction of connectivity modulation.
|
difference between Day 1 (pre-intervention); post-intervention at Week 4 (pre-intervention - Post-intervention)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Outcomes as Measured by LBP Intensity Scores
Time Frame: Difference between the Day 1 (pre-intervention) and post-intervention at Week 4 (post-intervention - pre-intervention)
|
The Low Back Pain Numeric Rating Scale (LBP NRS) is a standardized adaptation of the Pain Numeric Rating Scale for assessing pain intensity specifically related to the lower back.
It uses an 11-point scale from 0 ("no low back pain") to 10 ("worst low back pain imaginable"), allowing patients to rate their pain over the past week.
|
Difference between the Day 1 (pre-intervention) and post-intervention at Week 4 (post-intervention - pre-intervention)
|
|
Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF) Differences Before and After Treatments
Time Frame: Day 1 (pre-intervention); post-intervention at Week 4
|
Investigators will examine Cerebral blood flow (CBF) changes before and after treatment in several pain-related brain areas.
Cerebral blood flow represents the volume of blood delivered to brain tissue per unit time, CBF data will be collected during arterial spin labeling (ASL) scans that will take place before the first treatment and after the last treatment.
Images from these scans will be aggregated to an average CBF-weighted image to be used for analysis.
In this report, we focused on bilateral postcentral Gyrus (MNI coordinate: +/-18, -34, 56, 2 mm sphere)
|
Day 1 (pre-intervention); post-intervention at Week 4
|
|
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Differences
Time Frame: Day 1 (pre-intervention); post-intervention at Week 4 (pre-intervention - post-intervention)
|
Participants' quantitative sensory testing (QST) ratings were analyzed before and after all treatments.
Here, we report the heat pain threshold measured around the affected lower back area.
|
Day 1 (pre-intervention); post-intervention at Week 4 (pre-intervention - post-intervention)
|
|
Primary Motor Cortex (M1) rsFC Changes Before and After 4-week Treatments
Time Frame: Day 1 (pre-intervention); post-intervention at Week 4 (pre-intervention - post-intervention)
|
We investigated whether tDCS and acupuncture treatments modulate resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) of the M1. This was evaluated by comparing pre- and post-treatment MRI scans. In this report, we focused on the rsFC between the PAG and the rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC), using a seed defined by the rACC peak MNI coordinate (0, 34, 20) with a 2-mm radius sphere. Functional connectivity values were computed as Pearson's correlation coefficients between the mean time series of predefined regions of interest (ROIs). To improve normality and enable parametric statistical analysis, these correlation coefficients (r) were converted to Fisher z values using the transformation z = 0.5 × ln[(1 + r) / (1 - r)]. Higher Fisher z values indicate stronger positive connectivity, whereas lower values indicate weaker or negative connectivity. Changes in Fisher z values from baseline to post-intervention |
Day 1 (pre-intervention); post-intervention at Week 4 (pre-intervention - post-intervention)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2018P001970
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.