Expanding HIV Testing Among Uganda Adults Who Utilize Traditional Healers

February 11, 2021 updated by: Weill Medical College of Cornell University
HIV antiretroviral therapy has the potential to dramatically decrease HIV transmission worldwide1; yet, a barrier to ending the AIDS epidemic in low-resource settings is the fact that healthcare is largely provided by traditional or spiritual healers rather than biomedical providers, and there are no strategies in place to identify HIV-infected patients among Traditional Healer patients and link them to HIV care. In order to reach the UNAIDS 90-90-90 benchmarks HIV services must reach marginalized populations in endemic regions, such as in southwestern Uganda. Uganda is one of seven sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries accounting for 90% of all new HIV infections in this region6. HIV prevalence is 7.3%, with ~1.5 million people living with HIV/AIDS and 99,000 new infections in 2014. However, only 50% of sexually active Ugandans have ever tested for HIV8. In the project location of southwestern Uganda, like much of SSA, the majority of Ugandans utilize Traditional Healers (TH), but little is known about Traditional Healer practices or rates of HIV testing (or HIV infection) among their clients. Specific aims of this study are to: 1) identify key socio-structural factors that frame HIV testing behaviors among Ugandan adults who utilize Traditional Healers; 2) investigate acceptability of providing point-of-care HIV testing at Traditional Healer practice locations; and 3) develop and pilot a prospective HIV testing intervention among Traditional Healer patients to promote earlier diagnosis. Results will be used to implement subsequent, large-scale cluster-randomized HIV testing intervention at Traditional Healer practice locations. Findings from the proposed study include formative data on populations that utilize Traditional Healers in an HIV-endemic region of Uganda, and pilot testing of an HIV testing intervention at healer practice locations; these results could be applied towards expanding HIV testing in other low-resource, endemic settings.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This study has three specific aims:

Specific Aim 1: Identify key socio-structural factors that frame HIV testing behaviors among clients of Ugandan TH, using an exploratory sequential, mixed-methods study design. First, qualitative interviews with 25-35 purposely-sampled TH clients will characterize the care-seeking trajectory, HIV testing behaviors and related stigma, healthcare costs, and HIV risks and exposures. Based on these results, a survey will be designed and administered to 300 Ugandan adults who utilize TH in Mbarara District. This cross-sectional study will identify 1) rates of HIV testing among TH clients and 2) variables that independently predict HIV testing within the prior 12 months. These data will inform a model of HIV testing behavior among TH clients based on the Andersen Model of Healthcare Utilization, and generate hypotheses to be tested in Specific Aim 2.

Specific Aim 2: Characterize acceptability of receiving point-of-care (POC) HIV testing at TH locations, using an exploratory sequential, mixed-methods approach. Qualitative interviews with 15-25 purposely sampled TH and 15-25 purposely-sampled TH clients will explore attitudes and experiences with biomedicine, feasibility and acceptability of delivering POC HIV testing at TH locations, and investigate relevant themes emerging from Aim 1. Based on qualitative results, a survey will be developed and administered to 175 TH in Mbarara District. This cross-sectional study will characterize TH practices relevant to HIV testing, and identify characteristics of healers who favorably view the proposed intervention (Specific Aim 3). These data will be integrated with results from SA1 to develop an intervention that will overcome socio-structural barriers to HIV testing.

Specific Aim 3: Develop and pilot an HIV testing intervention among TH clients using a cluster randomized study design. Integration of results from SA1 and SA2 will inform a pilot HIV testing intervention at 9 TH practice locations, to be compared with a control group receiving usual TH care at 8 practices. This pilot will offer HIV testing at TH practice sites to 250 TH clients at the intervention arm sites, and offer protocoled usual care to 250 clients at control arm sites. Primary outcome for this study will be rates of HIV testing among TH clients. Secondary outcomes will include i) number of new HIV diagnoses among TH clients, and ii) number of patients with +HIV POC test who successfully link to HIV care in 3 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Mbarara, Uganda
        • Mbarara University of Science and Technology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 year of age or older
  • able to provide informed consent
  • not known to be HIV infected
  • willing to be contacted at 3 months following enrollment
  • willing to complete an exit survey after 3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • being under the age of 18 years
  • incapable of giving informed consent
  • previously being diagnosed with HIV
  • being unwilling to receive HIV test results
  • unwilling to participate in the testing intervention

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Healer HIV testing intervention
We will follow Ugandan National protocols to administer voluntary HIV testing at 9 TH practice locations throughout Mbarara District over a 9 month period.
HIV 1/2 antigen-antibody POC test (Oraquick©) will be administered to those participants who agree to test. Pre-test counseling will be performed before results are delivered. Clients with positive tests will be provided with detailed contact information for the MUST ISS clinic, and given specific instructions to present to the clinic as soon as possible for confirmatory testing and linkage to care.
No Intervention: Healer control arm
Patients will undergo protcolized usual TH care at 8 practices, which include HIV education and a referral to receive VCT through existing resources. Study staff will contact the client at 3 months following enrollment to assess for self-report of VCT.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of TH Clients Who Received HIV Testing
Time Frame: within 3 months following study visit
Primary study outcome was receipt of an HIV test within 90 days of enrollment. In the control arm, this was assessed via self-report at time of 90-day phone call follow up. For intervention arm, the participating healer recorded whether an HIV test was accepted by the participant at the time of the study visit. If the HIV test was accepted and delivered, the healer recorded the result of the test.
within 3 months following study visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of New HIV Diagnoses Among TH Clients
Time Frame: within three months following enrollment.
For intervention arm participants, the healer recorded the result of the point-of-care HIV test for those participants who agreed to test during the study visit. In the control arm, this outcomes was assessed via self-report during the 90-day follow up phone call.
within three months following enrollment.
Number of Patients With +HIV Test Who Successfully Link to HIV Care
Time Frame: at three months following enrollment.
This outcome was assessed via self-report during the 90-day follow up phone call. For participants newly testing HIV-positive, questions were posed to determine if they had received confirmatory testing, and initiated ART medication.
at three months following enrollment.
Age in Years of Control Arm Subjects Who Received an HIV Test
Time Frame: 3 months following study enrollment
Participants in the control arm assessed for primary outcomes of receiving an HIV test within 3 months of study enrollment. Participant age in years at time of study enrollment, and association with primary outcome of receiving an HIV test
3 months following study enrollment
Gender of Control Arm Subjects Who Received an HIV Test
Time Frame: at 3 months following enrollment
Self-reported participant gender and association with primary study outcome of receiving an HIV test
at 3 months following enrollment
Highest Level of Education for Control Arm Subjects Who Received an HIV Test
Time Frame: at 3 months following study enrollment
Participant self-reported highest level of education, and association with study primary outcome of receiving an HIV test
at 3 months following study enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Radhika Sundararajan, MD, PhD, Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 25, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

De-identified IPD may be shared with other researchers with reasonable, written requests, and approval from all researchers involved with this current study.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV/AIDS

Clinical Trials on HIV testing at traditional healer practices

3
Subscribe