Telehealth-Based Resistance Training Intervention for Endometrial Cancer Survivors

July 21, 2021 updated by: University of Wisconsin, Madison

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Telehealth-Based Resistance Training Intervention for Endometrial Cancer Survivors

This 2-arm pilot trial will enroll 40 participants to test the feasibility, adherence, and benefits of a home-based strength training intervention for endometrial cancer survivors relative to a wait-listed control group.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Endometrial cancer survivors have an extremely high prevalence of inactivity and obesity. Inactivity and obesity are associated with poorer outcomes among survivors. Other interventions have demonstrated that walking and aerobic exercise are safe and feasible in endometrial cancer patients. However few published studies have examined strength training in endometrial cancer survivors, and these have done so only in combination with aerobic intervention (and often also dietary change) in the context of a larger multi-component intervention.

There is a critical need for data about the feasibility and benefits of strength training in this population. The investigators propose a 2-arm pilot trial of a home-based strength training intervention (vs. waitlist control) among 40 endometrial cancer survivors. The intervention will consist of (a) an initial in-person instructional session; (b) instructional materials and resistance training equipment (e.g., resistance bands) and (c) support and feedback provided via video coaching sessions. The purpose of a pilot trial is not to conduct hypothesis testing, but rather to field-test the logistical components of the study to incorporate into a larger, future study design.

The proposed trial will determine the feasibility of an at-home resistance training protocol and measurements of exercise logging, functional fitness testing, DXA, dried blood spots and questionnaire measures. Participants will be assigned either to the resistance training program (i.e., initial in-person instructional session, telephone coaching, and self-monitoring) or to a comparison arm (wait-list control).

  • Aim 1: To determine the feasibility of recruiting and retaining endometrial cancer survivors to a home- based resistance training 2 sessions per week of 20-40 minutes of exercise.
  • Aim 2: To determine participant satisfaction with each component of the intervention and identify opportunities for refinement of the intervention prior to testing in a larger study.
  • Aim 3: To establish that functional and objective assessments are feasible and well-tolerated in enrolled participants, as assessed using the functional fitness test (FFT) battery, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), finger-pricks for dried blood spots and patient-reported outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53706
        • University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 74 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Willing to provide written informed consent
  • Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study
  • Fluent in spoken and written English
  • Documented diagnosis of Type I, stage I-IIIc endometrial cancer within the past 5 years
  • Completion of current treatment for endometrial cancer, period of time of ≥10 weeks from treatment completion to study enrollment is required

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absolute contraindications to exercise (i.e., acute myocardial infarction, severe orthopedic or musculoskeletal limitations
  • Have evidence of recurrent or metastatic disease
  • Are currently performing resistance training ≥2 days per week
  • Report of chest pain, shortness of breath, fainting, or angina pectoris
  • Have physical disability that would limit range of motion through exercises such as sitting, standing and inability to walk one block
  • Plans to move from the area
  • Enrolled in another clinical trial or has used of any investigational drugs, biologics, or devices within 30 days prior to randomization
  • Women who are pregnant or breast-feeding
  • Not suitable for study participation due to other reasons at the discretion of the investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Strength-Training Intervention
Following baseline measures, participants will receive an initial in-person instructional session, instructional material and resistance training equipment, support and feedback via video coaching, mid-point assessment, and an in-person study visit to collect post study measures. Intervention will be 10 weeks, with a 5 week follow up period.
Accelerometer (steps), Biomarkers (finger prick for hemoglobin A1c and c-reactive protein), Anthropometrics (height, weight, waist and hip circumference), Body composition (dual-energy absorptiometry for measuring fat mass, lean mass, % body fat, visceral fat), Functional fitness test.
2 sessions per week (20-40 min), home-based resistance training
Accelerometer (steps)
Accelerometer (steps), Biomarkers (finger prick for hemoglobin A1c and c-reactive protein), Anthropometrics (height, weight, waist and hip circumference), Body composition (dual-energy absorptiometry for measuring fat mass, lean mass, % body fat, visceral fat), Functional fitness test.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Waitlist Control
Following baseline measures, participants will provide mid-point measures, and in-person post-study measures with no 10-week strength training intervention.
Accelerometer (steps), Biomarkers (finger prick for hemoglobin A1c and c-reactive protein), Anthropometrics (height, weight, waist and hip circumference), Body composition (dual-energy absorptiometry for measuring fat mass, lean mass, % body fat, visceral fat), Functional fitness test.
Accelerometer (steps)
Accelerometer (steps), Biomarkers (finger prick for hemoglobin A1c and c-reactive protein), Anthropometrics (height, weight, waist and hip circumference), Body composition (dual-energy absorptiometry for measuring fat mass, lean mass, % body fat, visceral fat), Functional fitness test.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility - Number of Participants Recruited
Time Frame: up to 2 years
The feasibility of recruiting endometrial cancer survivors to a home-based resistance training; 2 sessions per week of 20-40 minutes of exercise. This will be measured by the number of participants recruited. The goal is 40 participants.
up to 2 years
Number of Participants Who Completed 100% of the Prescribed Exercises
Time Frame: up to 20 weeks from beginning of intervention
Compliance/adherence will be measured via detailed exercise logs. A participant needs to complete at least 50% of the prescribed exercises in a session to be considered adherent to the session.
up to 20 weeks from beginning of intervention
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: up to 20 weeks
The primary safety endpoint will be total number of adverse events over the duration of the intervention.
up to 20 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Reporting "Very" or "Extremely" Satisfied With Intervention
Time Frame: At final visit - up to 20 weeks
Participants will complete semi-structured qualitative interviews with the study coordinator. Interviews will be recorded, transcribed and coded to identify content themes. These interviews will be used to collect qualitative information and overall satisfaction with the intervention, as well as areas to improve with future interventions and barriers to participation.
At final visit - up to 20 weeks
Change in Hemoglobin A1c From Baseline
Time Frame: baseline and 10 weeks
Baseline and post-study blood biomarkers to assess Hemoglobin A1c will be collected and reported in a table as a change from baseline.
baseline and 10 weeks
Change in C-Reactive Protein From Baseline
Time Frame: baseline and 10 weeks
Baseline and post-study blood biomarkers to assess c-reactive protein will be collected and reported in a table as a change from baseline.
baseline and 10 weeks
Change in Lean Muscle Mass From Baseline
Time Frame: baseline and 10 weeks
Baseline and post-study lean muscle mass will be assessed using dual-energy absorptiometry (DXA) using the enCORE Lunar iDXA software suite (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK). Data will be reported in a table as change from baseline.
baseline and 10 weeks
Change in Fat Mass From Baseline
Time Frame: baseline and 10 weeks
Baseline and post-study fat mass will be assessed using dual-energy absorptiometry (DXA) utilizing the enCORE Lunar iDXA software suite (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK). Data will be reported in a table as change from baseline.
baseline and 10 weeks
Change in Visceral Fat Mass From Baseline
Time Frame: up to 20 weeks
Baseline and post-study visceral fat mass will be assessed using dual-energy absorptiometry (DXA) utilizing the enCORE Lunar iDXA software suite (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK). Data will be reported in a table as change from baseline.
up to 20 weeks
Change in Total Percent Body Fat From Baseline
Time Frame: baseline and 10 weeks
Baseline and post-study % body fat will be assessed using dual-energy absorptiometry (DXA) utilizing the enCORE Lunar iDXA software suite (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK). Data will be reported in a table as change from baseline.
baseline and 10 weeks
Change in Number of Arm Curls Performed From Baseline
Time Frame: baseline and 10 weeks

Arm curls are part of the functional fitness test (FFT); a battery of tests measuring strength, flexibility, fitness, body composition, and agility. These tests will be performed at baseline and post-study time points. Data will be reported in a table as change from baseline.

The 30 second arm curl assesses the strength of the upper body, where participants hold a 5 pound dumbbell in a seated position, and they will have 30 seconds to curl their arm and extend it as many times as possible within the time frame.

baseline and 10 weeks
Change in Number of Sit to Stand Repetitions Performed From Baseline
Time Frame: baseline and 10 weeks

The 30 second chair stand is part of the functional fitness test (FFT); a battery of tests measuring strength, flexibility, fitness, body composition, and agility. This test will be performed at baseline and post-study time points. Data will be reported in a table as change from baseline.

The 30 second chair stand assesses the strength of the lower body. Each person will have 30 seconds to stand up and sit down from a chair as many times as possible within the time frame.

baseline and 10 weeks
Change in Handgrip Weight From Baseline
Time Frame: baseline and 10 weeks

Handgrip is part of the functional fitness test (FFT); a battery of tests measuring strength, flexibility, fitness, body composition, and agility. This test will be performed at baseline and post-study time points. Data will be reported in a table as change from baseline.

[can you describe this test? I do not see it in the protocol]

baseline and 10 weeks
Change in Sit and Reach Distance From Baseline
Time Frame: baseline and 10 weeks

The chair sit and reach test is part of the functional fitness test (FFT); a battery of tests measuring strength, flexibility, fitness, body composition, and agility. This test will be performed at baseline and post-study time points. Data will be reported in a table as change from baseline.

The chair sit and reach assesses lower body flexibility where the participant will sit in a chair, extend one leg in front of them and flex at the waist, reaching toward their toes, the measure is the distance between their toes and fingers.

baseline and 10 weeks
Change in Back Scratch Distance From Baseline
Time Frame: baseline and 10 weeks

The back scratch test is part of the functional fitness test (FFT); a battery of tests measuring strength, flexibility, fitness, body composition, and agility. This test will be performed at baseline and post-study time points. Data will be reported in a table as change from baseline.

The back scratch test assesses the upper body flexibility, where the person is seated and one arm will be flexed behind the head, and the other arm will be extended behind the shoulder. The assessment measures the distance between the finger tips of both hands.

baseline and 10 weeks
Change in 6-minute Walk Distance From Baseline
Time Frame: baseline and 10 weeks

The 6-minute walk test is part of the functional fitness test (FFT); a battery of tests measuring strength, flexibility, fitness, body composition, and agility. This test will be performed at baseline and post-study time points. Data will be reported in a table as change from baseline.

The 6 minute walk test measures the total distance that a person can quickly walk on a flat hard surface within a period of 6 minutes, using a 100ft length of distance.

baseline and 10 weeks
Change in 8 Foot Up and Go Time From Baseline
Time Frame: baseline and 10 weeks

The 8-foot-up and go test is part of the functional fitness test (FFT); a battery of tests measuring strength, flexibility, fitness, body composition, and agility. This test will be performed at baseline and post-study time points. Data will be reported in a table as change from baseline.

The 8-foot-up and go is an assessment of speed agility and balance. The participant begins in a seated position and will be timed for the duration it takes to rise from the chair, walk as quickly as possible around a cone 8 feet away from the chair, and return to a seated position.

baseline and 10 weeks
FACT Scores
Time Frame: baseline, 5 weeks, 10 weeks
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapies (FACT) changes from baseline, mid-point, to post-study will be captured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapies (FACT) questionnaire including the Endometrial subscale (FACT-En). The FACT assessment measures physical, social/family, and functional well-being, each on a scale of 0-28, and emotional well being on a scale of 0-24. The Endometrial component contains concerns specific to endometrial cancer such as hot/flashes, cramps, and swelling; measured on a scale of 0-64. Each of these sections will be scored for sub-scale scores and then the entire instrument will have a total composite score (0-172; the higher the score, the more quality of life improvements) and will be reported as such.
baseline, 5 weeks, 10 weeks
Changes in FACT From Baseline
Time Frame: baseline and 10 weeks
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapies (FACT) changes from baseline, mid-point, to post-study will be captured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapies (FACT) questionnaire including the Endometrial subscale (FACT-En). The FACT assessment measures physical, social/family, and functional well-being, each on a scale of 0-28, and emotional well being on a scale of 0-24. The Endometrial component contains concerns specific to endometrial cancer such as hot/flashes, cramps, and swelling; measured on a scale of 0-64. Each of these sections will be scored for sub-scale scores and then the entire instrument will have a total composite score (0-172; the higher the score, the more quality of life improvements) and will be reported as such.
baseline and 10 weeks
FACT-En Scores
Time Frame: baseline, 5 Weeks,10 weeks
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapies (FACT) changes from baseline, mid-point, to post-study will be captured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapies (FACT) questionnaire including the Endometrial subscale (FACT-En). The Endometrial component contains concerns specific to endometrial cancer such as hot/flashes, cramps, and swelling; measured on a scale of 0-64, the higher the score, the more quality of life improvements.
baseline, 5 Weeks,10 weeks
Changes in FACT-En From Baseline
Time Frame: baseline and 10 weeks
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapies (FACT) changes from baseline, mid-point, to post-study will be captured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapies (FACT) questionnaire including the Endometrial subscale (FACT-En). The Endometrial component contains concerns specific to endometrial cancer such as hot/flashes, cramps, and swelling; measured on a scale of 0-64, the higher the score, the more quality of life improvements.
baseline and 10 weeks
FACT Physical Subscale Scores
Time Frame: baseline, 5 weeks, 10 weeks
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapies (FACT) changes from baseline, mid-point, to post-study will be captured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapies (FACT). The FACT assessment measures physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being, each on a scale of 0-28. Each of these sections will be scored for sub-scale scores; the higher the score, the more quality of life improvements.
baseline, 5 weeks, 10 weeks
FACT Social Subscale Scores
Time Frame: baseline, 5 weeks, 10 weeks
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapies (FACT) changes from baseline, mid-point, to post-study will be captured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapies (FACT). The FACT assessment measures physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being, each on a scale of 0-28. Each of these sections will be scored for sub-scale scores; the higher the score, the more quality of life improvements.
baseline, 5 weeks, 10 weeks
FACT Emotional Subscale Scores
Time Frame: baseline, 5 weeks, 10 weeks
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapies (FACT) changes from baseline, mid-point, to post-study will be captured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapies (FACT). The FACT assessment measures physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being, each on a scale of 0-28. Each of these sections will be scored for sub-scale scores; the higher the score, the more quality of life improvements.
baseline, 5 weeks, 10 weeks
FACT Functional Subscale Scores
Time Frame: baseline, 5 weeks, 10 weeks
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapies (FACT) changes from baseline, mid-point, to post-study will be captured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapies (FACT). The FACT assessment measures physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being, each on a scale of 0-28. Each of these sections will be scored for sub-scale scores; the higher the score, the more quality of life improvements.
baseline, 5 weeks, 10 weeks
Changes in FACT Subscales From Baseline
Time Frame: baseline and 10 weeks
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapies (FACT) changes from baseline, mid-point, to post-study will be captured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapies (FACT). The FACT assessment measures physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being, each on a scale of 0-28. Each of these sections will be scored for sub-scale scores; the higher the score, the more quality of life improvements.
baseline and 10 weeks
Changes in Mental Well-being From Baseline
Time Frame: baseline and Week 10

Changes in mental well-being from baseline, mid-point, and post-study (including anxiety, depression, and fatigue) will be assessed using standardized NIH-provided Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures.

The fatigue assessment asks about self-reported systems of fatigue and tiredness, all the way up to exhaustion overall, and ask about fatigue over the past seven days. The depression assessment asks about depressive symptoms over the past seven days. The anxiety assessment asks about symptoms adjacent-to and including anxiety over the past seven days. For each of these three instruments (which comprise the mental well-being assessments) the data will be reported as change over time, specifically using the T-score (standardized mean) and the standard error.

Each is standardized to a mean of 50 and a range of 0-100; a higher scores indicate a higher "level" of that construct, whether it's higher levels of depression, fatigue or anxiety.

baseline and Week 10
Changes in Self-Efficacy From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 10 weeks

Self-efficacy will be assessed at baseline, mid-point, and post-study using the validated self-efficacy for exercise scale, modified for specificity to strength training.

This instrument has 9 items, each of which is scored from 0-10, with a maximum score of 90. Higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy for exercise. These scores will be reported descriptively at each time point (baseline, mid-point, final), and will also be reported in a table as change over time.

Baseline and 10 weeks
Self-Efficacy Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, 5 weeks, 10 weeks

Self-efficacy will be assessed at baseline, mid-point, and post-study using the validated self-efficacy for exercise scale, modified for specificity to strength training.

This instrument has 9 items, each of which is scored from 0-10, with a maximum score of 90. Higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy for exercise. These scores will be reported descriptively at each time point (baseline, mid-point, final), and will also be reported in a table as change over time.

Baseline, 5 weeks, 10 weeks
Changes in Accelerometer-Measured Physical Activity From Baseline
Time Frame: baseline and Week 10

Although aerobic and lifestyle physical activity (PA) are not a focus of the intervention, they will be assessed to determine baseline PA level and identify whether uptake of resistance training is associated with changes in other PA types. Participants will wear the ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometer (ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL) for 7 days during all waking hours, at baseline, mid-point, and post-study visit. The ActiGraph is a gold standard method of objective activity assessment. Accelerometer data will be measured in total minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity over a 7-day period.

Light intensity is Moderate intensity is Vigorous intensity is

baseline and Week 10
Change in Steps Per Day From Baseline
Time Frame: baseline and Week 10
Although aerobic and lifestyle physical activity (PA) are not a focus of the intervention, they will be assessed to determine baseline PA level and identify whether uptake of resistance training is associated with changes in other PA types. Participants will wear the ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometer (ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL) for 7 days during all waking hours, at baseline, mid-point, and post-study visit. The ActiGraph is a gold standard method of objective activity assessment. Accelerometer data will be measured in total minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity over a 7-day period.
baseline and Week 10

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 5, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 14, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 14, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 26, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 13, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UW18013
  • P30CA014520 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • A176000 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
  • EDUC/KINESIOLOGY (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
  • NCI-2018-02257 (REGISTRY: NCI CTRP)
  • 2018-0953 (OTHER: IRB)
  • 1R03CA230965-01A1 (NIH)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endometrial Cancer

Clinical Trials on Baseline Measures

Subscribe