Efficacy of a Web-based Sexual Violence Risk Reduction Program for Female College Students (RealConsent)

February 8, 2023 updated by: Laura F Salazar, Georgia State University

RealConsent: A Web-based Program to Reduce College Women's Risk of Sexual Violence by Targeting Alcohol Use, Communication and Consent, and Building Supportive Networks

This study evaluates the efficacy of a web-based program for female college freshmen ("RealConsent") in reducing their risk of sexual violence victimization. Half the participants will receive RealConsent-F and half will receive an attention-placebo control ("Stress and Mood Management").

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Sexual assault of college women is a serious and complex public health problem: one in five college women report being sexually assaulted. The purpose of this study is to conduct a randomized controlled trial study with 750 female college students from three universities to test the efficacy of RealConsent, a sexual violence risk reduction program for college women, compared to an attention-placebo control. RealConsent is a multi-media 3-hour program based on social cognitive theory and alcohol myopia theory. The primary outcome will be self-reported sexual violence victimization and the secondary outcomes will be alcohol and dating protective- and risk-related behaviors and resistance strategies. The investigators expect that women in the treatment group will report less sexual violence victimization than women in the control group. Expected outcomes are demonstrated feasibility and efficacy of a technologically novel risk reduction program for female college students.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

881

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30303
        • Georgia State University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 20 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • female, aged 18-20 years, full-time freshmen, matriculated at Georgia State University, Emory University, or University of Georgia, and single (i.e., not in a committed dating relationship).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • other education levels, married, and/or graduate status

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: RealConsent
A 3-hour web-based program designed to teach female college freshmen strategies to reduce their risk of sexual violence victimization.
This 3-hour web-based program consists of four 45-minute modules that are interactive and range in number of segments (1-14) and types of activities. Each of the modules involves interactivity, didactic activities and two episodes of a serial drama ("Squad"), which allow for the modeling of positive behaviors and illustrate both positive and negative outcome expectations. Behaviors modeled include drinking safely (e.g., eating before drinking, pacing, and drinking water), having a game plan before going out, communicating with male sex partners, engaging in protective dating behaviors, use of resistance strategies, self-defense strategies and bystander intervention with the goal of reducing risk of being sexually assaulted.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Stress and Mood Management
A 3-hour general mental health web-based program.
This 3-hour general health promotion web-based program consists of four 45-minute modules ("Stress Management", "Managing Depression", "Managing Anxiety", and "Treatments that work") that provide a range of activities related to reducing day-to day stress and alleviating anxiety through meditation and exercise.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Sexual Violence Victimization at 6-months Follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline to 6-months
Sexual assault victimization was assessed with Revised Sexual Experience Survey. Participants were asked how often they experienced 7 unwanted sexual experiences. Also, the tactic that was used ("using force") was also noted. Response options ranged from 0 (never) to 3 (3+times). An overall score for the SES, was calculated by summing each outcome and tactic score ("SOTS") with a range from 0 to 135- with higher scores indicating more sexual violence victimization. The 2nd method combines several of the outcomes, but keeps tactics separate, resulting in a potential range of 0 to 63.
Baseline to 6-months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Alcohol Protective Behaviors at 6 Months
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Alcohol protective behaviors was measured by a scale developed by Martens et al., 2005 that included 15 protective strategies (e.g.., "alternate alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks") that asked participants if they had engaged in within the last 3 months. with response options of Never (1) to Always (5). Responses were summed across the 15 items. Potential range was 15 to 75. Higher scores indicated MORE protective strategies were used.
Baseline to 6 months
Change From Baseline in Dating Risk Behaviors at 6-months Follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Dating Risk Behaviors were measured by the Dating Behavior Survey created by Hanson & Gidycz, 1993. The scale consists of 15 items that assess different situational variables (e.g., "consuming alcohol on the first date") that have been found to be related to sexual violence victimization. Participants are asked to respond how often they have engaged in the behavior on the first few dates with a new partner. Response options ranged from Never (1) to Always (5). Scores are summed and higher scores indicate engaging in MORE risk behaviors. Overall scores can range from 15 to 75.
Baseline to 6 months
Change From Baseline in "Number of Times Engaged in Binge Drinking" to 6-months
Time Frame: Baseline to 6-months
Participants were asked at baseline and at 6-month follow-up, to report: "In the past 30 days, the number of times four or more drinks were consumed in one setting."
Baseline to 6-months
Change From Baseline in "Average Number of Alcoholic Drinks Per Occasion in Last 30 Days" to 6-months
Time Frame: baseline to 6-months
Participants were asked at baseline and at 6-month follow-up to report, "the average number of alcoholic drinks consumed per occasion in the last 30 days."
baseline to 6-months
Change From Baseline in Bystander Behavior at 6-months
Time Frame: Baseline to 6-months
Bystander behavior was assessed using the 20-item Bystander Behavior Scale. Items assessed whether participants engaged in bystander behaviors in the past three months and included items such as, "If I saw someone taking a very intoxicated person up to their room, I said something and asked what the friend was doing." Higher scores indicate a better outcome of engaging in more prosocial behaviors. Min value=0; Max value=60.
Baseline to 6-months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laura F. Salazar, PhD, Georgia State University
  • Study Director: Anne Marie Schipani-McLaughlin, PhD, Georgia State University
  • Study Chair: George Cavagnaro, MBA, Behavioral Science Technologies, LLC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 17, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 31, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 5R42AA025817-03 (NIH)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified data from approximately 750 female freshmen participating in this study will be made available. The final dataset will include self-reported sexual violence victimization experiences, risk behaviors and scale measures of secondary outcomes.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available within 6 months of study completion.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The study principal investigator will review all data requests. Requestors will be required to sign a Data Access Agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sexual Violence

Clinical Trials on RealConsent

3
Subscribe