Clinical Outcomes Associated With the Use of ViviGen® for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease (ViviGen)

June 5, 2025 updated by: Jad Khalil MD, William Beaumont Hospitals

Clinical Outcomes Associated With the Use of ViviGen® in Conjunction With Posterolateral Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease

The objective of this study is to perform a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial to compare radiographic fusion rates and patient reported outcomes, including pain and function preoperatively and postoperatively, using Depuy ViviGen® Cellular Bone Matrix mixed with cortical/cancellous allograft in conjunction with an approved Depuy Synthes pedicle screw system compared to autograft mixed with cortical/cancellous allograft in conjunction with the same DePuy Synthes pedicle screw system used for a one or two - level posterolateral lumbar fusion.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a prospective randomized, non-blinded, controlled study. Patients with a diagnosis of degenerative disc disease and/or up to grade I spondylolisthesis and planning to undergo a one or two-level instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion surgery between L1-S1 will be screened. If eligible and the subject meets all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria, the subject will be approached about study participation by the surgeon. If the subject agrees to participate, the consent process will be initiated by the study coordinator. Once the patient has been consented; data including medical history, neurological exam, patient questionnaires (visual analogue pain score (VAS), Oswestry low-back disability questionnaire (ODI), short form health survey (SF-36)) will be collected. Randomization will occur once a surgery date has been scheduled so the appropriate instrumentation can be boarded accordingly. A randomization envelope will reveal randomization treatment group. The envelopes will be generated in a 1:1 fashion and be randomly allocated to an assigned study identification number.

Subjects will be randomized to either: 1) treatment arm where the investigator will use an FDA approved/cleared DePuy Synthes spinal pedicle screw system with ViviGen® Cellular Bone Matrix mixed with cortical/cancellous allograft or the 2) control arm where the investigator use the same DePuy Synthes spinal pedicle screw system with local autologous bone graft mixed with cortical/cancellous allograft. Both treatment groups represent standard of care lumbar fusion surgeries using two types of bone graft options to create the arthrodesis as comparators.

Once the lumbar fusion surgery has taken place as planned; data will be collected regarding the surgery performed, including operative time, amount of bone graft used, spinal system used, length of hospital stay, and adverse events/complications.

Study subjects will be followed up at 6-weeks, 3-months, 6-months, and 12-months postoperatively at the private practice or clinic. During these routine (standard of care) postoperative visits, subjects will complete questionnaires (VAS, ODI, SF-36, patient satisfaction) and have neurological exam (lumbar spine exam, see appendix 1) completed by the investigator. Adverse events related to device and/or procedure will be evaluated as each postoperative visit. Anteroposterior (AP) and lateral x-rays will be performed at all visits with flexion and extension x-rays added at baseline, 3-months, 6-months, and 12-months. A CT scan of the lumbar spine will be performed during the 12-month postoperative time frame at the Beaumont-Royal Oak Imaging Center. Radiographic analysis will be performed and evaluated for fusion status as evidenced by bony bridging, presence of radiolucency, and development of pseudoarthrosis at each follow-up visit.

This study design reflects the current standard of care for lumbar spinal stenosis, degenerative disc disease and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Lumbar fusion surgery using pedicle screw fixation with autograft and allograft bone grafting options is treatment of choice after conservative (non-surgical) therapies have been implemented and failed.

Addendum:

  1. In order to protect the well-being of patients and in compliance with the current state mandated shelter in place order, follow-up visits will be completed via telephone visit by the study coordinator when possible. This includes patient reported outcomes and adverse event reporting. Some parts of the study visit may not be completed over the phone such as lumbar x-rays, neuro exam, and CT scan (at 12-months postop); these missing (or scheduled at a later date) protocol specific items will be noted as a protocol deviation with the reason being due to COVID-19.
  2. If a televisit is not possible, the visit may be rescheduled at a later date. Therefore, out of window and missing visits will be recorded as protocol deviations with the reason being due to COVID-19.
  3. Subject follow-up visits will be rescheduled in the office once the acute phase of the pandemic has subsided if the study visit is not substantially out of window.
  4. Subject enrollment is on hold until the acute phase of the pandemic has subsided but screening will continue.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Royal Oak, Michigan, United States, 48073
        • William Beaumont Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ≥18 years of age
  2. Able to provide consent
  3. Is undergoing standard of care one or two-level instrumented posterolateral fusion at the level between L1-S1
  4. Has diagnosis of spinal stenosis, degenerative disc disease and/or up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis
  5. Requires decompression at intended fusion level (multi-level decompression allowed L1-S1)
  6. Has failed 6-weeks or more of conservative, non-operative treatment
  7. Has back and/or radicular lumbar symptoms with ODI score of ≥ 30 preoperatively.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any prior lumbar fusion surgery
  2. Requires fusion of more than two levels
  3. Requires an interbody fusion based on relevant diagnoses and factors (such as foraminal stenosis, degree of spondylolisthesis, spinal deformity, disc space collapse, and subject's age) as determined by investigator
  4. BMI > 40
  5. Active systemic infection or infection at operative site
  6. History of an osteoporotic fracture and/or vertebral body fracture
  7. Is currently being treated with chemotherapy, radiation, immunosuppression or chronic steroid therapy
  8. History of osteoporosis, osteopenia, or osteomalacia that would contraindicate spinal surgery
  9. Psychological or physical condition in the opinion of the investigator that would interfere with subject self-assessments
  10. History of neurological condition in the opinion of the investigator that may affect lumbar function and pain assessments
  11. Subjects with a history of cancer must be disease free for at least 3 years
  12. Pregnant, or plans on becoming pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: ViviGen® Cellular Bone Matrix with DePuy Synthes Spinal Pedicle Screw System
20 subjects undergoing one or two-level instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion surgery using ViviGen Cellular Bone Matrix mixed with cortical/cancellous allograft and DePuy Synthes pedicle screw system
ViviGen® is manufactured by LifeNet Health. ViviGen® Cellular Bone Matrix is a formulation of cryopreserved viable cortical cancellous bone matrix and demineralized bone. ViviGen is a Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-based Product (HCT/P) as defined by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 21 CFR 1271.10 and will be used with the FDA approved DePuy Synthes Spinal pedicle screw system for fusion.
Other Names:
  • ViviGen® Cellular Bone Matrix
Placebo Comparator: Local Bone Autograft with DePuy Synthes Spinal Pedicle Screw System
20 subjects undergoing open, one or two-level posterolateral lumbar fusion surgery using local autograft mixed with cortical/cancellous allograft and DePuy Synthes pedicle screw system.
Patient's own bone harvested during spinal surgery will be used with the FDA approved DePuy Synthes spinal pedicle screw system to create the fusion.
Other Names:
  • Local Bone Autologous Bone Graft

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Successful Lumbar Fusion Measured Radiographically
Time Frame: 12 months postoperative
Count of participants with successful lumbar bone fusion as measured by CT scan and flexion/extension x-rays at 12-months as evidenced by the following three criteria: bony bridging, no presence of radiolucency and no development of pseudoarthrosis at the treated lumbar level
12 months postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Count of Participants With Revision Surgery by Month 12
Time Frame: 12 months postoperative
Count of participants with revision surgery by month 12
12 months postoperative
Visual Analog Scale for Pain
Time Frame: 12 months postoperative
Number of participants achieving equal to or greater than a 2-point decrease in patient reported outcomes as measured by Visual Analog Scale for pain (0-10 point scale, 0 = no pain and 10 = severe amount of pain) from baseline to 12-months, representing a decrease in pain.
12 months postoperative
Change in Oswestry Disability Index for Pain and Function
Time Frame: 12 months postoperative
Number of participants achieving equal to or greater than 15-point decrease in patient reported outcomes as measured by Oswestry Disability Index (0-100 point scale, 0 = least amount of disability, 100 = most severe disability) from baseline to 12-months.
12 months postoperative
Change in Short Form Health Survey-36 for Quality of Life: Physical Component Summary
Time Frame: 12 months postoperative
Number of participants achieving equal to or greater than 15-point increase in patient reported quality-of-live outcomes as measured by a composite Physical Component Summary score on the SF-36 (0-100 point scale, 0 = low favorable health state and 100 = most favorable health state) from baseline to 12-months. This Physical Component Summary score is calculated by averaging scores from the Pain, Physical Functioning, Physical Role Limitation, and General Health Perception subscales for each patient at 12 months and at baseline, and calculating a difference. A positive number indicates an increase in physical health, and a negative number indicates a decrease in physical health.
12 months postoperative
Neurological Deficit Per Lumbar Spine Neurological Exam
Time Frame: 12 months postoperative
Count of participants with new or worsening neurological (lumbar motor and sensory) deficit as evaluated by lumbar spine neurological exam from baseline through 12 months.
12 months postoperative
Count of Participants Developing Pseudoarthrosis by Month 12
Time Frame: 12 months postoperative
Count of participants developing pseudoarthrosis by month 12
12 months postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jad G Khalil, MD, William Beaumont Hospitals

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 19, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 25, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

June 25, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 7, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Degenerative Disc Disease

Subscribe