Synek Score to Predict Poor Neurological Outcome Post Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest

The Performance of the Synek Score to Predict Poor Neurological Outcome in Postanoxic Comatose Patients Treated With Induced Hypothermia

Resuscitated cardiac arrest (CA) is a frequent cause of admission in intensive care unit (ICU). Neurological state of postanoxic comatose patients can evolve either towards the absence of awakening or towards a more or less altered state of consciousness, ranging from the vegetative state to the full recovery of cognitive functions. Most of the deaths result from active withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment, based on poor neurological outcome prediction. Neurological prognostication needs therefore a multimodal approach based on reliable parameters, which should be easy to access and available at the early stage of care, in attempt to limit false poor outcome prognostication and help to not prolong futile active care in patient with severe post anoxic cerebral lesions. Nowadays the prediction of neurological outcome relies on a multimodal strategy including clinical examination, biomarkers and electroencephalography (Guidelines ESICM 2015). Early standard electroencephalography (EEG) is currently recommended and some features, notably absence of reactivity, status epilepticus or burst suppression after rewarming are strongly predictive of poor outcome. But those features require a precise analyze of the EEG usually performed by specialist. EEG patterns can be simplified and classified in five grades according to the Synek classification, ranging from dominant reactive alpha activity (grade 1) to isoelectric encephalogram (grade 5). Grade 1 and two are considering as good prognostic, grade 3 as intermediate and grade 4 to five as poor prognostic. Nevertheless, few data are available on the performance of this classification since generalization of TTM use.

We hypothesize that a multimodal strategy combining clinical examination, NSE concentration and the Synek score would bring a high degree of prediction. We aimed to assess the performances of the combination of clinical examination, NSE analysed at 48-72h and the Synek score to predict hard outcome defined by a cerebral performance category (CPC) 3-5, in postanoxic comatose patients treated with induced hypothermia

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

240

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amiens, France, 80000
        • CHU Amiens Picardie

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Age ≥ 18 years with inclusion criteria : Will be considered for inclusion patients admitted in our ICU following a resuscitate cardiac arrest between November 1, 2013 to November 1, 2017 , treated with 33° induced hypothermia for 24 h, having at least one early EEG rated according to Synek score and an available dosage of NSE performed within 48-72h post CA.

exclusion criteria: moribund patients, awoke within the first 48 hours of admission, neurologic causes of CA, and patients with missing data

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients admitted in our ICU following a resuscitate cardiac arrest between November 1, 2013 to November 1, 2017
  • treated with 33° induced hypothermia for 24 h
  • having at least one early EEG rated according to Synek score
  • available dosage of NSE performed within 48-72h post CA

Exclusion Criteria:

  • moribund patients
  • awoke within the first 48 hours of admission
  • neurologic causes of CA
  • patients with missing data

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary outcome is the CPC 3-5 score at 3 months or at death time
Time Frame: at 3 months
at 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on induced hypothermia

3
Subscribe