Bipolar RFA of Painful Extra-spinal Bone Metastases (PERFACOOL)

August 28, 2024 updated by: University Hospital, Strasbourg, France

Pain Evaluation After Treatment of Extra-spinal Bone Metastases With OsteoCOOL Radiofrequency (RF) Ablation System

To evaluate the worst pain of cancer patients with painful extra-spinal bone metastases 1 month after bipolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA) performed with the Osteocool system.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Strasbourg, France, 67000
        • University Hospital, Strasbourg, france

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1) Multi-metastatic cancer patients with at least one painful lytic bone metastasis
  • 2) Target lesion should correspond to a specific radiologic finding
  • 3) At least a moderate pain produce by target lesion (4 on a scale of 0 to 10 over the prior 24 hours with or without pain killers intake) assessed during selection evaluation
  • 4) Patients 18 years old
  • 5) Able to give written consent
  • 6) Life expectancy 1 months
  • 7) Patient affiliated to the National Health Insurance system

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Radiation therapy on the target tumor terminated < 3 weeks before treatment
  2. Any contra-indication for the procedure as stated by the radiologist in terms of tumor size, proximity to neural/vascular structures making the procedure at unacceptable risk
  3. Any contra-indication for the procedure as stated by the radiologist related to patient's condition (e.g. cardiac pacemakers) making the procedure at unacceptable risk
  4. Impaired haemostasis
  5. Concurrent participation in other experimental studies that could affect endpoints of this study
  6. Contraindication to any form of sedation/anaesthesia
  7. Signs of local/systemic infection identified before procedure, in accordance with standard care
  8. Sclerotic metastases
  9. Adults under guardianship
  10. Patients under judicial protection
  11. Pregnant or breastfeeding woman

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: RFA
Single-arm prospective observational study
Single session percutaneous extra-spinal bone metastasis destruction to achieve pain relief

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percentage of responding patients reporting an improvement of at least 3 points on item 3 "the worst pain in the last 24 hours" of Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 month
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Comparison of the mean scores of the items 3, 5, 9B and 8 of the BPI questionnaire between the baseline and 6-month follow-up
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Safety will be assessed according to SIR(11) / CTCAE classification
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Mean scores variation of the morphine milligram equivalents (MME) (based on patient consumption diary) between the baseline and 6-month follow-up.
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Percentage of responding patients defined by an improvement of at least 3 points on item 3 "the worst pain in the last 24 hours" of Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) questionnaire at 3 and 6 month follow-up.
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Luigi Roberto CAZZATO, MD, University Hospital, Strasbourg, france

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 12, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 2, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 6, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multi-metastatic Cancer

Clinical Trials on Percutaneous RFA

Subscribe