Promoting Dignity, Meaningfulness and Mental Well-Being

April 10, 2024 updated by: University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Efficacy of a Personalized Modular Intervention to Promote Dignity, Meaningfulness and Mindfulness by a Palliative Care Consultation-Liaison Service in Swiss Acute Hospital Care. A Feasibility Study

Feasibility study to test the feasibility and acceptability of a designed personalized modular Intervention consisting of three modules, including Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) Therapy, Dignity Therapy (DT), and a mindfulness-based Intervention

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patient with a life-limiting serious illness commonly experience substantial emotional and spiritual distress, death anxieties, depressive symptoms and loss of dignity and purpose in life. Fostering dignity and meaning and relieving psychological distress have been identified as a core objective for end-of-life care. However, individual's needs for dignity and psychological support at the end of life may vary. Therefore, a personalized approach is needed. On the basis of theoretical frameworks and existing dignity- fostering and meaning- based interventions, as well as an one-day workshop with international experts in the field of palliative care, a personalized modular intervention, consisting of three modules, including CALM Therapy, Dignity Therapy, and a mindfulness-based Intervention, was developed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Basel, Switzerland, 4031
        • Department of Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Basel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed Consent as documented by signature
  • Patients in palliative situation (i.e. patients suffering from an advanced, incurable, life-limiting disease with multimodal support needs)
  • Estimated life expectancy ≤ 18 months
  • Patients seen by the palliative consultation-liaison service at the University Hospital Basel as an in- or outpatient
  • Willingness and capacity to commit at least three contacts over about 7-10 days

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Being delirious or otherwise substantially cognitively impaired (based on clinical consensus)
  • Being too ill to complete the requirements of the study protocol
  • Unable to understand and speak German

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Dignity Therapy (DT) module
psychotherapeutic intervention asking patients about their most important achievements, roles and other important aspects of life; two structured sessions of 60 minutes conducted by a trained therapist
psychotherapeutic intervention asking patients about their most important achievements, roles and other important aspects of life; two structured sessions of 60 minutes conducted by a trained therapist
Active Comparator: CALM Therapy module
supportive-expressive psychotherapy aiming to help (1) manage the disease, symptom and treatment, and communicate with healthcare providers, to (2) adjust to changes in self-concept, personal relationships, and support needs, to (3) find a sense of meaning and purpose in life, and to (4) prepare for the future, sustain hope, and face the end of life; two structured sessions of 60 minutes conducted by a trained therapist
supportive-expressive psychotherapy aiming to help (1) manage the disease, symptom and treatment, and communicate with healthcare providers, to (2) adjust to changes in self-concept, personal relationships, and support needs, to (3) find a sense of meaning and purpose in life, and to (4) prepare for the future, sustain hope, and face the end of life; two structured sessions of 60 minutes conducted by a trained therapist
Active Comparator: Mindfulness-based interventions module
Mind-body techniques reducing existential and spiritual distress and dealing with common experiences related to life-limiting diseases, including loss of control, uncertainty about the future; two structured sessions of 60 minutes conducted by a trained therapist
Mind-body techniques reducing existential and spiritual distress and dealing with common experiences related to life-limiting diseases, including loss of control, uncertainty about the future; two structured sessions of 60 minutes conducted by a trained therapist

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in acceptability of the personalized modular Intervention (motivation, satisfaction with Intervention, further recommendation)
Time Frame: baseline until 1-month follow- up
Motivation for participating in the study, Satisfaction with the intervention, and If intervention would be recommended to other patients, measured by a semi-structured interview; assessment at baseline (T0), after the completion of the intervention (T1 = 2 weeks after baseline) and at 1-month follow- up (T2)
baseline until 1-month follow- up
Rate of eligibility
Time Frame: at baseline (T0)
feasibility of the personalized modular Intervention measured by rate of eligibility
at baseline (T0)
Rate of consent
Time Frame: at baseline (T0)
feasibility of the personalized modular Intervention measured by rate of consent
at baseline (T0)
Final recruitment rate
Time Frame: at baseline (T0)
feasibility of the personalized modular Intervention measured by final recruitment rate
at baseline (T0)
Change in Patient adherence
Time Frame: baseline until 1-month follow- up
feasibility of the personalized modular Intervention measured by rate of drop- Outs; assessment at baseline (T0), after the completion of the intervention (T1 = 2 weeks after baseline) and at 1-month follow- up (T2)
baseline until 1-month follow- up
Change in Questionnaire completion rates
Time Frame: baseline until 1-month follow- up
feasibility of the personalized modular Intervention measured by rate of completion of questionnaire and expenditure of time for completing questionnaire (in minutes); assessment at baseline (T0), after the completion of the intervention (T1 = 2 weeks after baseline) and at 1-month follow- up (T2)
baseline until 1-month follow- up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: baseline until 1-month follow- up
PHQ-9 is a 9-question instrument given to patients to screen for the presence and severity of Depression. Scores Depression severity from 0 (=none) to 27 (severe); assessment at baseline (T0), after the completion of the intervention (T1 = 2 weeks after baseline) and at 1-month follow- up (T2)
baseline until 1-month follow- up
Change in Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI)
Time Frame: baseline until 1-month follow- up
25-item PDI measurement of various sources of dignity-related distress among patients nearing the end of life; each item rated on a five-point scale (1=not a problem; 2= a slight problem; 3=a problem; 4=a major problem; 5=an overwhelming problem); assessment at baseline (T0), after the completion of the intervention (T1 = 2 weeks after baseline) and at 1-month follow- up (T2)
baseline until 1-month follow- up
Change in Death and Dying Distress Scale (DADDS)
Time Frame: baseline until 1-month follow- up
15-item scale to assess concerns related to death and dying in patients with advanced cancer. Items are answered on a 6-point scale from 0 (no distress) to 5 (extreme distress). Total scores may range from 0 to 75 and scores ≥45 refer to the presence of at least moderate death anxiety. Assessment at baseline (T0), after the completion of the intervention (T1 = 2 weeks after baseline) and at 1-month follow- up (T2)
baseline until 1-month follow- up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sandra Eckstein, Dr. med, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 5, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 16, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2018-01998, va18Eckstein

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Life-limiting Serious Illness

Clinical Trials on Dignity Therapy (DT) module

Subscribe