Targeting of UnControlled Hypertension in Emergency Department (TOUCHED)

June 15, 2025 updated by: Heather Prendergast, University of Illinois at Chicago

Targeting of UnControlled Hypertension in Emergency Department (TOUCHED)

The proposed project underscores the following: 1) The prevalence of uncontrolled/undiagnosed hypertension (HTN) in underrepresented groups presenting to the ED is alarmingly high, and 2) ED engagement and early risk assessment/stratification is a cost-effective, feasible innovation to help close health disparity gaps in HTN. This proposal involves a two-arm randomized controlled trial of up to 770 patients from the Emergency Department at University of Illinois Hospital with elevated blood pressure (BP). The primary objective is to determine the effectiveness of an emergency department-initiated Educational and Empowerment (E2) intervention with a Post Acute Care Hypertension Consultation (PACHT-c) intervention (arm 2) on the primary outcome of mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) differences between the two trial arms at 6-months post intervention. Secondary objectives include evaluating the effectiveness of this ED education and empowerment intervention on mean SBP and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) differences at 3-months, and mean DBP differences at 6-months.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study is a single-site randomized controlled trial (RCT) focused on a high-risk ED population with evidence of moderately elevated BP (≥140/90 mmHg) at discharge. ED patients will be recruited and randomized into two arms: 1) usual care (preprinted discharge instructions and 48-72 hour referral to a federally qualified health center (FQHC) or assigned provider as appropriate); 2) ED-initiated E2 intervention program followed by 48-72 hour referral to a FQHC (or assigned health center). Based on the ED population demographics (70% ethnic minorities), the majority of participants will be underrepresented minorities (NHB and Hispanic) and low-income individuals. The investigators propose the following specific aims and hypotheses:

Aim 1: Evaluate the effectiveness of an ED-based E2 + PACHT-c intervention (arm 2) on the primary outcome of mean SBP difference at 6-months post-intervention compared to usual care (arm 1).

H1: The mean SBP difference (from baseline) will be significantly greater in the E2+ PACHT-c group (arm 2) compared to the usual care group (arm 1) at 6- months post-randomization, i.e., SBP change in arm 2 > arm 1 at 6-months post-randomization.

Aim 2: Evaluate the effectiveness of an ED-based E2 intervention with PACHT-c on the secondary outcome of mean SBP and DBP differences at 3-months, and mean DBP differences at 6 months post-intervention compared to usual care.

H2: The mean SBP and DBP differences from baseline to 3- months post-intervention and mean DBP at 6-months post intervention will be significantly greater in the ED-based E2 intervention compared to the usual care group, i.e., SBP and DBP change in arm 2 > arm 1 at 3 -months post-intervention and DBP change in arm 2 > arm 1 at 6 -months post-intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

574

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • University of Illinois at Chicago

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • BP>=140/90 and <=180/110 mm Hg at time of discharge from ED
  • Verbal fluency in English or Spanish
  • Age 18-75 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to verbalize comprehension of study, impaired decision-making or documented dementia
  • Plans to move from Chicago area within the next year
  • Pregnant or trying to get pregnant
  • COVID-19 positive within the past 14 days

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Usual Care
Participants randomized to usual care will receive preprinted discharge instructions on HTN and a 48-72-hour referral to our FQHC (or other community health center if pre-assigned though Illinois Medicaid) to schedule their follow-up appointment (current standard of care)
Active Comparator: Educational and Empowerment Intervention

Participants receive:

  1. HTN Educational Video about high BP, how it is diagnosed, and importance of treatment to prevent secondary complications.
  2. Visual Echocardiogram Image Clips of age/gender-matched echocardiograms will be used to educate and motivate patients to change behavior and improve their BP.
  3. Mobile Health and Remote BP monitoring- participants receive an FDA-approved home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) kit that includes the Nokia wireless BPM+ monitor and Health Mate mobile app. The app automatically launches when the patient slips on the cuff. Synced data are automatically uploaded from the mobile app to the iCardia server of our study.
  4. A Post-Acute Care HTN Transition consultation (PACHT-c) with a clinical pharmacist or advanced practice nurse (APN).
The video will educate participants in arm 2 about high BP, how it is diagnosed, and the importance of treating it to prevent secondary complications.
Visual clips of age/gender-matched echocardiograms will be used to educate and motivate patients to change their behavior and improve their BP. We have found that real time visualization of cardiac ultrasound images with active discussion of findings is a significant patient motivator and empowerment tool, and was a significant factor in the success of our previous pilot study.
All participants randomized to the intervention group will receive an FDA-approved HBPM kit that includes the Nokia wireless (self-inflating) BPM+ monitor and Health Mate mobile app. The app automatically launches when the patient slips on the cuff and turns on the monitor to measure his/her BP. Synced data are automatically uploaded from the mobile app to the iCardia server of our study.
All participants randomized to the E2 intervention will have a focused consultation with either a clinical pharmacist or an APN. During this consultation, the pharmacist/APN repeats the BP measurement; reviews the screening assessments; and reviews general principles of BP control including nutrition, exercise, and smoking cessation. BP will be managed according to the current published guidelines available at the time of funding regarding initiation of first-line antihypertensive medications. Patients with BP ≥160/100 mmHg may be started on antihypertensive medications by the provider during the consultation if appropriate.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) Difference at 6 Months Post-intervention Compared to Usual Care.
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months after baseline
Blood pressure will be collected at two time points (baseline and 6 months). ED-pharmacists and trained research assistants will perform BP measurements using standardized procedures.
Baseline, 6 months after baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Differences at 3 Months Post-intervention Compared to Usual Care.
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months after baseline
Blood pressure will be collected at two time points (baseline and 3 months). ED-pharmacists and trained research assistants will perform BP measurements using standardized procedures.
Baseline, 3 months after baseline
Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Difference at 6 Months Post-intervention Compared to Usual Care.
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months after baseline
Blood pressure will be collected at two time points (baseline and 6 months). ED-pharmacists and trained research assistants will perform BP measurements using standardized procedures.
Baseline, 6 months after baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Heather Prendergast, MD, MPH, MS, University of Illinois at Chicago

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 19, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2017-0118
  • 1R61HL139454-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The TOUCHED data sets will be submitted to the NHLBI Data repository, and will include the following:

  • Data Information collected and recorded from study participants, including baseline, interim visit, ancillary data, outcome data, laboratory measurements not otherwise summarized, blood pressure measurements; quantitative results from survey assessments; clinical event surveillance and follow-up contacts.
  • Study documentation: Descriptive information regarding the conduct of the study and collection of Data, including study protocol, manual of operations/procedures, annotated data collection forms, codebooks /data dictionary, and descriptions of data derived from procedures.

In the preparation and delivery of the Data to the NHLBI Data Repository, all personal identifiers will be eliminated. A summary of all proposed modifications and deletions to be made to a data set will be submitted to and approved by the NHLBI Data Repository representative prior to their implementation.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The TOUCHED data set will be submitted to the NHLBI Program Officer, no later than 3 years after the end of the clinical activity (final patient follow-up, etc.) or 2 years after the main paper of the trial has been published, whichever comes first.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases

Clinical Trials on HTN Educational Video

Subscribe