Nutritional Strategies to Increase Nitric Oxide Signaling in Raynaud's Phenomenon (NivOSe)

May 12, 2021 updated by: University Hospital, Grenoble
The investigators aim at comparing the efficacy of a 2 weeks supplementation by L-citrulline or beetroot juice to L-citrulline placebo or denitrated beetroot juice respectively on Raynaud's phenomenon severity. Raynaud's phenomenon severity will be assessed through the Raynaud Condition Score, daily frequency of attacks or cumulative attack duration (expressed as min) daily collected by patients in a diary. Each Volunteer will choose his own main outcome among these 3 criteria.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) is a clinical condition that follows an exaggerated vasoconstriction of extremities in response to a cold or emotional stress. Microvascular dysfunction and alteration of the endothelial NO-dependent vasodilatation pathway through NO synthases (NOS) represents one of the main mechanisms.

A pharmacological treatment in RP is proposed to patients when conservative measures are not efficient enough to control the symptoms: calcium channel blockers remains the first line, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors as a second line treatment, while intravenous iloprost remains restricted to patients with digital ischaemia. Vasodilator therapies are commonly associated with side effects due to the non-specific systemic vasodilation that often result in permanent discontinuation. Many patients prefer complementary and alternative therapies, but none has proven its efficacy. Therefore, there is still room for improvement in the treatment of RP, and research is needed in this area.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • BMI > 18
  • Active Raynaud's Phenomenon characterized by a clinical history of Raynaud's

    1. Primary RP or secondary to limited (LSSc), limited or diffuse cutaneous scleroderma (lcSSc or dcSSc) according to the criteria of Leroy and Medsger.
    2. At least 1 RP attacks per week and a specific finger patient picture in RP attack (assessed over the 2 weeks preceding inclusion)
  • Stable disease over the previous two months (i.e. recent diagnosis of SSc will be excluded)
  • Patients insured by a social security scheme or beneficiaries of such a scheme
  • Patients who have dated and signed the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, uncontrolled angina
  • Haemodynamic instability
  • Pregnancy (or considering pregnancy in next 4 months) or breast feeding
  • Subject in an exclusion period from another study,
  • Subject under administrative or judicial supervision
  • Subject not able to be contacted in case of emergency

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: L-citrulline

Six cycles will be conducted over two consecutive winters. One cycle will consist of two 2-week supplementation periods.

A 7 days wash-out period will be imposed between treatment periods (placebo and treatment).

L-citrulline 9g per day (capsule, per os) during 14 days;
Experimental: Beetroot juice

Six cycles will be conducted over two consecutive winters. One cycle will consist of two 2-week supplementation periods.

A 7 days wash-out period will be imposed between treatment periods (placebo and treatment).

Concentrated 70 ml beetroot juice bottles containing 6.45 mmol of nitrates
Placebo Comparator: L-citrulline placebo

Six cycles will be conducted over two consecutive winters. One cycle will consist of two 2-week supplementation periods.

A 7 days wash-out period will be imposed between treatment periods (placebo and treatment).

L-citrulline placebo (maltodextrin) 9g per day (capsule, per os) during 14 days
Placebo Comparator: Denitrated beetroot juice

Six cycles will be conducted over two consecutive winters. One cycle will consist of two 2-week supplementation periods.

A 7 days wash-out period will be imposed between treatment periods (placebo and treatment).

Concentrated 70 ml nitrate-depleted beetroot juice

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Raynaud Condition Score
Time Frame: first winter: inclusion visit week 2, week 7, week 13, week 19; second winter: inclusion visit week 2,week 7, week 13, week 19
Change from baseline in the Raynaud's Condition score (RCS). RCS is participant's rating of difficulty considering number of attacks, duration, amount of pain, numbness, or other symptoms caused in the fingers (including painful sores) due to the Raynaud's phenomenon every day and impact of Raynaud's alone on use of hands every day. An 11 point Likert scale is used to rate the difficulty caused by the condition each day with 0 = no difficulty and 10 = extreme difficulty.
first winter: inclusion visit week 2, week 7, week 13, week 19; second winter: inclusion visit week 2,week 7, week 13, week 19
Frequency of RP
Time Frame: 7 days (An attack is defined as an episode of pallor or cyanosis (with or without pain,tingling or numbness). The number of attacks is self-reported every day and averaged over 7-day periods)
number of RP attacks during treatment, as compared to placebo
7 days (An attack is defined as an episode of pallor or cyanosis (with or without pain,tingling or numbness). The number of attacks is self-reported every day and averaged over 7-day periods)
Change in cumulative attack duration
Time Frame: first winter: inclusion visit week 2, week 7, week 13, week 19; second winter: inclusion visit week 2,week 7, week 13, week 19
Mean duration of Raynaud's attacks for a time period was calculated as sum of recorded durations of attacks in the time period divided by total number of attacks in the time period where duration was recorded.
first winter: inclusion visit week 2, week 7, week 13, week 19; second winter: inclusion visit week 2,week 7, week 13, week 19

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
Time Frame: first winter: week 2, 4, 5, 7, 13, 19; second winter: week 2, 4, 5, 7, 13, 19

Mean duration of Raynaud's attacks for a time period was calculated as sum of recorded durations of attacks in the time period divided by total number of attacks in the time period where duration was recorded.

It will be assessed through adverse events collected in the daily dairies cards.

first winter: week 2, 4, 5, 7, 13, 19; second winter: week 2, 4, 5, 7, 13, 19
Plasma concentration of L-arginine/ADMA ratio
Time Frame: first winter: week 2, 4, 5, 7; second winter: week 2, 4, 5, 7
It will be quantified and compared under the 4 conditions.
first winter: week 2, 4, 5, 7; second winter: week 2, 4, 5, 7
Plasma concentration of nitrites
Time Frame: first winter: week 2, 4, 5, 7; second winter: week 2, 4, 5, 7
It will be quantified and compared under the 4 conditions.
first winter: week 2, 4, 5, 7; second winter: week 2, 4, 5, 7
Plasma concentration of L-arginine
Time Frame: first winter: week 2, 4, 5, 7; second winter: week 2, 4, 5, 7
It will be quantified and compared under the 4 conditions.
first winter: week 2, 4, 5, 7; second winter: week 2, 4, 5, 7
Urinary GMPc
Time Frame: first winter: week 2, 4, 5, 7; second winter: week 2, 4, 5, 7
It will be quantified and compared under the 4 conditions.
first winter: week 2, 4, 5, 7; second winter: week 2, 4, 5, 7

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean-Luc Cracowski, MD, Grenoble University Hospital, Clinical Pharmacology Department

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 30, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 3, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Raynaud Phenomenon

Clinical Trials on L-citrulline

3
Subscribe