- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03750279
Inflammatory Targeted Laser Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis
Inflammatory Targeted Low-level Laser Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis - A Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bergen, Norway, 5018
- University of Bergen
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion criteria:
- Any gender
- Age ≥ 50 years
- Pain on movement ≥ 40 mm Visual Analog Scale
- Knee pain for the last ≥ 3 months
- KOA verified with the American College of Rheumatology criteria using a history and physical examination, i.e. knee pain and at least three of the following: ≥ 50 years old, ≤ 30 minutes of morning stiffness, crepitus on active range of motion, bony tenderness, bony enlargement, and no palpable warmth of synovia
Exclusion criteria:
- Knee alloplastic
- Total meniscectomy
- Intra-articular steroid injection and/or oral steroid treatment within the last six months
- Cancer
- Rheumatoid arthritis
- Severe cognitive deficit
- Neurological deficits affecting the knee
- Inability to speak and understand English/Norwegian
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Exercise therapy + LLLT
|
Level 1: Pelvic lifts (2x15 rep.), one-legged knee bends (2x10 rep. per leg), hip abductions (2x10 rep. per leg). The participants may progress from level 1 to level 2. Level 2: Pelvic lifts (3x15 rep.), one-legged knee bends (3x10 rep. per leg), hip abductions (2x10 rep. per leg), sideways slide (2x10 rep. per leg), and backwards slide (2x10 rep. per leg). The participants may regress from level 2 to level 1.
- LLLT (60 mW mean output per probe, 904 nm wavelength) applied to the knee in adherence with the recommendations by World Association for Laser Therapy, in terms of dosage per treatment spot.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Exercise therapy + sham LLLT
|
Level 1: Pelvic lifts (2x15 rep.), one-legged knee bends (2x10 rep. per leg), hip abductions (2x10 rep. per leg). The participants may progress from level 1 to level 2. Level 2: Pelvic lifts (3x15 rep.), one-legged knee bends (3x10 rep. per leg), hip abductions (2x10 rep. per leg), sideways slide (2x10 rep. per leg), and backwards slide (2x10 rep. per leg). The participants may regress from level 2 to level 1.
- Same procedure as in the LLLT group with the exception of laser irradiation (0 mW mean output power).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain on movement
Time Frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
The participants are asked to rate their pain experienced on movement using an unidimensional visual analogue scale (VAS).
"No pain" (0) is written in one end and "worst imaginable pain" (100) is written in the other end of the VAS tool.
|
0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
|
Pain at night
Time Frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
The participants are asked to rate their pain experienced in bed at night using an unidimensional visual analogue scale (VAS).
"No pain" (0) is written in one end and "worst imaginable pain" (100) is written in the other end of the VAS tool.
|
0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
|
Pain at rest
Time Frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
The participants are asked to rate their pain experienced at rest in sitting position using an unidimensional visual analogue scale (VAS).
"No pain" (0) is written in one end and "worst imaginable pain" (100) is written in the other end of the VAS tool.
|
0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
|
Pain in general
Time Frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
Pain in general is reported with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire pain subscale.
The subscale is based on Likert scales, each with five severity categories.
The raw KOOS score is transformed to a 0-100 percentage score (higher is better).
|
0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Physical function in daily living
Time Frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
Physical function in daily living is reported with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire physical function in daily living subscale.
The subscale is based on Likert scales, each with five severity categories.
The raw KOOS score is transformed to a 0-100 percentage score (higher is better).
|
0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
|
Physical function in sports and recreational activities
Time Frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
Physical function in sports and recreational activities is reported with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire physical function in sports and recreational activities subscale.
The subscale is based on Likert scales, each with five severity categories.
The raw KOOS score is transformed to a 0-100 percentage score (higher is better).
|
0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
|
Quality of life
Time Frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
Quality of life is reported with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire quality of life subscale.
The subscale is based on Likert scales, each with five severity categories.
The raw KOOS score is transformed to a 0-100 percentage score (higher is better).
|
0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
|
Global health status assessment
Time Frame: 8 weeks after randomization
|
The participants evaluate their change from baseline in terms of symptoms in general from 1 to 7 (1, no symptoms; 7, worse than ever).
|
8 weeks after randomization
|
|
Real time ultrasonography assessment of effusion
Time Frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
Maximum height will be measured.
|
0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
|
Real time ultrasonography assessment of neovascularization
Time Frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
Doppler area will be measured.
|
0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
|
Real time ultrasonography assessment of femur cartilage thickness
Time Frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
|
|
30 seconds chair stand
Time Frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
Last attempt counts if the participant is more than half way up.
|
0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
|
Knee extension active range of motion
Time Frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
A 30 cm goniometer is used.
|
0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
|
Knee flexion active range of motion
Time Frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
A 30 cm goniometer is used.
|
0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
|
Maximum pain free isometric quadriceps strength
Time Frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
A dynamometer is used: The dynamometer display is not visible during the procedure in order to blind the assessor for the level of pressure.
|
0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
|
Joint line pain pressure threshold
Time Frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
The most tender spot in the medial knee joint line is identified with palpation.
Subsequently, a pain pressure threshold algometer is used at this spot.
The display of the algometer is not visible during the procedure in order to blind the assessor for the level of pressure.
|
0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
|
Tibia bone pain pressure threshold
Time Frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
The most tender spot in the medial knee joint line is identified with palpation.
Subsequently, a pain pressure threshold algometer is used 1.5 cm distally from this spot.
The display of the algometer is not visible during the procedure in order to blind the assessor for the level of pressure.
|
0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
|
Analgesic drug consumption due to knee pain
Time Frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Bergen KOA laser RCT
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaCompletedKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Edin MešanovićCompletedOsteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis of the Knee | Osteoarthritis of Knee | Osteoarthritis of the Knees | Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee | Osteoarthritis Knee | Osteoarthritis in the Knee | Osteoarthritis of Knee JointBosnia and Herzegovina
-
Golden Jubilee National HospitalJohnson & Johnson; DePuy OrthopaedicsNot yet recruitingOsteoarthritis | Knee Osteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis (OA) | Osteo Arthritis | Osteoarthritis in the Knee | Osteoarthritis (Knee) | Osteo Arthritis of the KneeUnited Kingdom
-
Dr. David WassersteinSunnybrook Research InstituteRecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA) | Knee Osteoarthritis (OA)Canada
-
LifeBridge HealthMicroPort Orthopedics Inc.; Rubin Institute for Advanced OrthopedicsRecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis, Knee | Knee Pain Chronic | Arthropathy of Knee Joint | Knee Disease | Osteoarthritis Knees Both | Osteoarthritis Knee Left | Osteoarthritis Knee RightUnited States
-
Lucas R. Cusumano, MDNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Discomfort | Knee Pain Chronic | Knee Swelling PainUnited States
-
Emory UniversityVertex Pharmaceuticals IncorporatedNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee ArthritisUnited States
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)United States
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityChinese University of Hong Kong; Zhujiang HospitalNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
-
University of MiamiNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Exercise therapy
-
University Hospital, GhentCompletedInsertional Achilles TendinopathyBelgium
-
Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyCompletedPatellofemoral Pain Syndrome
-
Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training...Completedthe Effect of Virtual Reality on Stroke Rehabilitation
-
Proaxis TherapyVirginia Commonwealth University; Arcadia University; National Athletic Trainers...CompletedShoulder Impingement SyndromeUnited States
-
Taipei Medical UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Royal College of Surgeons, IrelandUnknownHip OsteoarthritisIreland
-
University Hospital, GhentCompletedAchilles TendinopathyBelgium
-
Gazi UniversityCompletedTemporomandibular DisorderTurkey
-
George Washington UniversityCompletedPrematurityUnited States
-
Medipol UniversityCompletedHemiplegia | Gait, Hemiplegic | Motor Function | Balance; DistortedTurkey