Study To Assess Local Tolerability of Crisaborole 2% Ointment and Vehicle Ointment In Healthy Participants Using Subject-reported Assessments and Objective Measurements

June 21, 2019 updated by: Pfizer

PHASE 1 RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, VEHICLE-CONTROLLED, INTRA-SUBJECT STUDY TO ASSESS LOCAL TOLERABILITY OF CRISABOROLE 2% OINTMENT AND VEHICLE IN HEALTHY PARTICIPANTS USING SUBJECT-REPORTED ASSESSMENTS AND OBJECTIVE MEASUREMENTS

A double-blind within-subject study to estimate observed application site adverse events following topical applications of crisaborole and vehicle in healthy participants

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To further understand the potential for crisaborole to evoke skin irritancy, a within-subject comparison study, C3291042 will assess the local tolerability of crisaborole 5 mg/cm² in healthy participants, who have had baseline assessments of surrogate markers of skin sensitivity-i.e. current perception threshold (CPT) measurements and standardized lactic acid stinging test (LAST) assessments. To further the clinical understanding of application site pain, responses to crisaborole ointment compared to crisaborole vehicle ointment will be assessed in comparisons based upon CPT (low versus high; symmetry versus asymmetry) and response to LAST ("stingers" versus "non-stingers"). This exploration of skin sensitivity characterizations in healthy participants exposed to crisaborole 5 mg/cm² will assess application site burning, stinging, and pain as well as other application site characteristics selected from a MedDRA-based list of terms by the participants. More advanced understanding of baseline application site sensation in healthy participants prior to higher local application rate of topical crisaborole may provide strategies for topical dermatologic product development programs striving to prevent or minimize application site sensory adverse events.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06511
        • New Haven Clinical Research Unit

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female adult participants who are overtly healthy as determined by medical evaluation including medical history, physical examination, and laboratory tests.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior self-reported history of any chronic relapsing inflammatory skin disease, including atopic dermatitis.
  • Evidence or history of clinically significant hematological, renal, endocrine, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, hepatic, psychiatric, neurological, or allergic disease (including drug allergies, but excluding untreated, asymptomatic, seasonal allergies at the time of dosing). Any clinically significant medical conditions or history of such conditions that, in the opinion of the Investigator may place the participant at an unacceptable risk as a participant in this trial.
  • History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C; positive testing for HIV, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb), or hepatitis C antibody (HCVAb). Hepatitis B vaccination is allowed.
  • History of serious adverse reactions or hypersensitivity to any topical drug (eg, crisaborole); or known allergy to any of the test product(s) or any components (eg, lactic acid) in the test product(s) or history of hypersensitivity; or allergic reactions to any of the study preparations
  • Abnormal physical findings of clinical significance or dermatological condition (eg extensive tattooing or excessive scarring at 14 sensitive skin application sites) at the Screening examination or Baseline which would interfere with the objectives of the study in the opinion of the Principal Investigator.
  • Daily use of medications that could interfere with the objectives of the study (such as lidocaine, gabapentin, pregabalin, narcotics, antihistamines, oral or parenteral corticosteroids, non-narcotic analgesics and anti-inflammatories) within 1 week of screening and during the study.
  • Not willing to refrain from shaving, the use of depilatories or other hair-removal activities, antiperspirants, lotions, skin creams, fragrances or perfumes, or body oils (eg, baby oil; coconut oil), use of hair products, hair gels, and hair oil in the treatment areas for 48 hours prior to admission to the PCRU and for the duration of the stay in the PCRU.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Group A (Crisaborole RIGHT SIDE / Vehicle LEFT SIDE)
Crisaborole ointment 2% applied to sensitive skin locations on right side of body. Crisaborole placebo vehicle ointment applied to sensitive skin locations on left side of body
Crisaborole 2% ointment (right side) and Placebo vehicle ointment (left side)
Other: Group B (Crisaborole LEFT SIDE / Vehicle RIGHT SIDE)

Crisaborole placebo vehicle ointment applied to 7 sensitive skin sites on right side of body.

Crisaborole ointment 2% applied to 7 sensitive skin locations on left side of body

Crisaborole 2% ointment (left side) and Placebo vehicle ointment (right side)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Frequency and Severity of Application site treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in crisaborole treated versus vehicle-treated prespecified sensitive skin sites
Time Frame: 3 days
Comparison of investigator-reported (Application Site Skin Examination [0 to 3 points]) and participant-reported (Local Tolerability Assessment Scale scores [0 to 3 points]) application site TEAEs in crisaborole treated versus vehicle-treated at all 7 prespecified sensitive skin sites.
3 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neurometric Measurement (Current Perception Threshold in mAmps) on Right-side and Left-side of Body (face, upper and lower extremities bilaterally)
Time Frame: 1 day
Comparison of Current Perception Threshold (CPT) measurements in participants bilaterally (face, upper extremities, lower extremities) to summarize CPT (absolute value in milliAmperes and right-left differential in milliAmperes) prior to study drug dosing (CPT assessments performed at 5 Hz, 250 Hz, and 2000 Hz) .
1 day
Quantify Participant's response to Lactic Acid Stinging Test (LAST) utilizing the Local Tolerability Assessment Scale (ranging from 0 to 3 points) to categorize as Stinger or Non-stinger
Time Frame: 1 day
Lactic Acid Stinging Test assessment showing Local Tolerability Assessment Scale score of 2 or 3 on lactic acid treated side AND a difference of at least 1 between lactic acid treated side and placebo treated side (ie, "stingers") versus Local Tolerability Assessment Scale score [ranging from 0 to 3 points] of 1 or less on lactic acid treated side (ie, "non-stingers").
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 14, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 30, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 24, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2019

Last Verified

June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • C3291042

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on Within-Subject Active vs Placebo Topical Applications

Subscribe