- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03761238
Early Liver Support With MARS in Post-hepatectomy Liver Failure (ELISH)
Early Liver Support With MARS in Post-hepatectomy Liver Failure: a Randomized, Multicentre Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
PHLF is a major risk factor for mortality in patients who underwent major hepatectomy. A specific treatment is yet not available. In a primary proof-of-concept study, it was shown that it is safe and feasible to use MARS in patients with PHLF early after hepatectomy. Survival was superior to a historical control group.
This study will include patients with early, primary PHLF (based on the 50:50 criteria) after major liver surgery. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive standard treatment alone or standard treatment + liver dialysis using the Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS). Relevant outcome along with several physiological parameters will be assessed.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients subjected for major liver surgery (4 or more Couinaud segments) or patients undergoing a 2nd, 3rd or 4th hepatic resection. Pre-operative chemotherapy and/or biological agents are allowed.
- Primary PHLF occurring early after surgery defined by the 50:50 criteria (from PO day 5 to day 14) or by the presence of hepatic encephalopathy grade 2 or more and the 50:50 criteria (from PO day 3 to 4).
- Written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- ALPPS (Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy) procedure.
- In patients with chronic liver disease presence of significant portal hypertension (hepatic venous pressure gradient ≥ 10 mmHg and/or Fibroscan ≥ 21kPa) prior to surgical intervention.
- Any contraindication for MARS therapy such as uncontrolled active bleeding, platelet counts <20.000 /µl or uncontrolled infection (presence of fever or adequate antibiotic therapy for less than 48h), septic shock, haemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support (noradrenaline > 1mg/h).
- PHLF occurring after post operative day 14.
- Secondary PHLF: post-operative liver failure secondary to vascular (outflow or inflow thrombosis) or septic problems.
- Persistant biliary complications (infected biloma, main biliary tree damage).
- Inability or unwilling of the patient or family to give informed consent.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Standard medical treatment + MARS
Patients assigned to the control arm will receive standard medical treatment (SMT) and liver dialysis using Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS).
|
MARS therapy will start within 24-48 h after randomization and be given on 3 consecutive days in sessions of 8-12 h.
The patients are observed for 2 days following the last session, with focus on bilirubin INR and signs of encephalopathy, and can thereafter receive 3 additional sessions in case of no or partial response to treatment.
Other Names:
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Standard medical treatment
Patients assigned to the control arm will receive standard medical treatment (SMT) as specified in the study protocol.
|
Patient management and standard medical treatment (SMT) as specified in the study protocol.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
60 day survival
Time Frame: From randomization to death from any cause, assessed up to 60 days postop
|
Overall survival rate from time of randomization to death from any cause
|
From randomization to death from any cause, assessed up to 60 days postop
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
28 day survival
Time Frame: From randomization to death from any cause, assessed up to 28 days post-op
|
Overall survival rate from time of randomization to death from any cause.
|
From randomization to death from any cause, assessed up to 28 days post-op
|
|
90 day survival
Time Frame: From randomization to death from any cause, assessed up to 90 days postop
|
Overall survival rate from time of randomization to death from any cause.
|
From randomization to death from any cause, assessed up to 90 days postop
|
|
6 month survival
Time Frame: From randomization to death from any cause, assessed up to 6 months postop
|
Overall survival rate from time of randomization to death from any cause.
|
From randomization to death from any cause, assessed up to 6 months postop
|
|
1 year survival
Time Frame: From randomization to death from any cause, assessed up to 1 year.
|
Overall survival rate from time of randomization to death from any cause.
|
From randomization to death from any cause, assessed up to 1 year.
|
|
Impact of MARS therapy on liver function
Time Frame: From randomization up to 1 year.
|
Impact of MARS therapy on liver function according to Child Pugh score (grade A, B and C)
|
From randomization up to 1 year.
|
|
Impact of MARS therapy on liver function
Time Frame: From randomization up to 1 year.
|
Impact of MARS therapy on liver function according to the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (5 groups: < 9, 10-19, 20-29, 30-39 and >40 points, lower points indicate improvement of liver function).
|
From randomization up to 1 year.
|
|
Impact of MARS therapy on extra-hepatic function (APACHE-II scoring)
Time Frame: From randomization up to 1 year.
|
Impact of MARS therapy on extra-hepatic function assessed by the Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scoring system (range 0-71 points, lower points indicate less severe disease).
|
From randomization up to 1 year.
|
|
Impact of MARS therapy on extra-hepatic function (SOFA scoring)
Time Frame: From randomization up to 1 year.
|
Impact of MARS therapy on extra-hepatic function assessed by the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scoring system (0-24 points, higher points indicate more severe disease).
|
From randomization up to 1 year.
|
|
Impact of MARS therapy on extra-hepatic function (CLIF-SOFA scoring)
Time Frame: From randomization up to 1 year.
|
Impact of MARS therapy on extra-hepatic function assessed by the Chronic Liver Failure-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (CLIF-SOFA) scoring system (0-24 points, higher points indicate more severe disease).
|
From randomization up to 1 year.
|
|
Impact of MARS therapy on splanchnic hemodynamics assessed by direct estimation of portal blood flow.
Time Frame: At randomization (day 0) and on day 10.
|
Impact of MARS therapy on splanchnic hemodynamics assessed by direct estimation of portal blood flow (ml/min).
|
At randomization (day 0) and on day 10.
|
|
Impact of MARS therapy on splanchnic hemodynamics assessed by indirect estimation of portal blood flow using ultrasonography.
Time Frame: At randomization (day 0) and on day 10.
|
Impact of MARS therapy on splanchnic hemodynamics assessed by indirect estimation of portal blood flow using ultrasonography (ml/min).
|
At randomization (day 0) and on day 10.
|
|
Impact of MARS therapy on splanchnic hemodynamics assessed by portal pressure measuring.
Time Frame: At randomization (day 0) and on day 10.
|
Impact of MARS therapy on splanchnic hemodynamics assessed by portal pressure measuring.
|
At randomization (day 0) and on day 10.
|
|
Impact of MARS therapy on liver regeneration assessed by volumetric liver analysis using combined Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MR).
Time Frame: At randomization (day 0) and on days 5, 10 and 30 .
|
Impact of MARS therapy on liver regeneration assessed by volumetric liver analysis using combined Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MR).
|
At randomization (day 0) and on days 5, 10 and 30 .
|
|
Impact of MARS therapy on liver regeneration assessed by serum levels of phosphate.
Time Frame: At randomization (day 0) and on days 5 and 10.
|
Impact of MARS therapy on liver regeneration assessed by serum levels of phosphate.
|
At randomization (day 0) and on days 5 and 10.
|
|
Impact of MARS therapy on liver regeneration assessed by serum levels of alphafetoprotein.
Time Frame: At randomization (day 0) and on days 5 and 10.
|
Impact of MARS therapy on liver regeneration assessed by serum levels of alphafetoprotein.
|
At randomization (day 0) and on days 5 and 10.
|
|
Impact of MARS therapy on liver regeneration assessed by serum levels of hepatocyte growth factor.
Time Frame: At randomization (day 0) and on days 5 and 10.
|
Impact of MARS therapy on liver regeneration assessed by serum levels of hepatocyte growth factor.
|
At randomization (day 0) and on days 5 and 10.
|
|
Impact of MARS therapy on liver performance status.
Time Frame: At randomization (day 0) and on days 5 and 10.
|
Impact of MARS therapy on liver performance status estimated using indocyanine green (ICG) clearance.
|
At randomization (day 0) and on days 5 and 10.
|
|
Impact of MARS therapy on liver toxins (bile acids) in serum and dialysate.
Time Frame: At randomization (day 0) and on days 5 and 10.
|
impact of MARS therapy on liver toxins (ammonia, bile acids and cytokines (IL-6 and TNF-alpha)).
Determinations in serum and in the dialysate.
|
At randomization (day 0) and on days 5 and 10.
|
|
Impact of MARS therapy on liver toxins (ammonia) in serum and dialysate.
Time Frame: At randomization (day 0) and on days 5 and 10.
|
impact of MARS therapy on liver toxins (ammonia).
Determinations in serum and in the dialysate.
|
At randomization (day 0) and on days 5 and 10.
|
|
Impact of MARS therapy on liver toxins (IL-6) in serum and dialysate.
Time Frame: At randomization (day 0) and on days 5 and 10.
|
impact of MARS therapy on liver toxins (IL-6).
Determinations in serum and in the dialysate.
|
At randomization (day 0) and on days 5 and 10.
|
|
Impact of MARS therapy on liver toxins (TNF-alpha) in serum and dialysate.
Time Frame: At randomization (day 0) and on days 5 and 10.
|
impact of MARS therapy on liver toxins (TNF-alpha).
Determinations in serum and in the dialysate.
|
At randomization (day 0) and on days 5 and 10.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Stefan Gilg, MD PhD, Karolinska Institutet
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ANTICIPATED)
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ELISH
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Liver Failure as A Complication of Care
-
University Hospital, LinkoepingRecruitingMRI | Liver Resection | Liver Failure as A Complication of CareSweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland
-
Boris Gala LopezMcGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University...WithdrawnLiver Failure as A Complication of Care | 30-day Mortality
-
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernRecruitingInfection as Complication of Medical Care | Joint (Knee or Hip Replacement)Switzerland
-
University of ZurichCompletedInfection as Complication of Medical CareSwitzerland
-
University of NebraskaCompletedAir Embolism as A Complication of Medical CareUnited States
-
Erasmus Medical CenterCompletedQuality of Life | Cognitive Impairment | Heart Arrest | Cardiac Arrest | Outcome, Fatal | Cardiac Arrest as A Complication of CareNetherlands
-
West Virginia UniversityCompletedInjury as a Result of PositioningUnited States
-
Mengmeng YuanAnhui Medical UniversityTerminatedPatients With Primary Liver Cancer (PLC) Undergoing Curative Surgical Procedures | Importance of Identifying Core Symptoms for Improving Symptom Management in PLC Patients | Application of Network Analysis as a Crucial Component of Cancer CareChina
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompletedAbdominal CT Imaging Performed as Standard of CareUnited States
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterAckerman Institute for FamilyActive, not recruitingSupport of the Family as a Caregiving SystemUnited States
Clinical Trials on Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System
-
Tampere UniversitySuspended
-
University of HelsinkiGE HealthcareCompleted
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompleted
-
Medical University of ViennaUnknownAcute Liver Failure | Hypoxic Hepatitis | Ischemic Hepatitis | Shock Liver | Hypoxic Liver InjuryGermany, Austria
-
Medical University of GrazFresenius Medical Care North AmericaCompleted
-
NanomixCompletedSepsis | SIRSUnited States
-
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, IndiaNot yet recruitingAcute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)
-
AHS Cancer Control AlbertaTransplant Genomics, Inc.Completed
-
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical UniversityThe First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University; The First Affiliated... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingDPMAS Therapy in Liver Disease PatientsChina
-
Guangdong Association of Clinical TrialsRecruitingNon Small Cell Lung CancerChina