- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07473089
Swiss Revision Cohort (REVCO)
Swiss Revision Cohort: a Nationwide, Multi-center, Prospective Periprosthetic Joint Infection Cohort Study
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients with periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) remains challenging. Successful management of PJI requires revision surgery of the prosthetic joint. The Swiss National Joint Registry (SIRIS) reported two-year revision rates of 2.5% for total hip arthroplasty and 3.3% for total knee arthroplasty in 2023, with infection being the most frequent cause of early revision (27.9% for hips and 20.6% for knees). Despite published guidelines, the management of PJI remains insufficiently standardized, primarily due to heterogeneous clinical presentations and limited availability of rigorous data from prospective studies and randomized controlled trials comparing interventions to improve outcomes. The presence of foreign material with biofilm formation further complicates the diagnosis and treatment of PJI, posing a significant challenge for clinicians necessitating close collaboration among specialists from various medical fields, including orthopaedic surgeons, microbiologists and infectious disease experts. A recent observational study suggests that a multidisciplinary team approach is associated with improved diagnostics, fewer surgeries, reduced length of hospital stay, and higher success rates.
This national cohort aims to describe the epidemiology, clinical phenotypes, management strategies and outcomes of patients with PJI. This is a national, multicentre, prospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study of patients who underwent revision for PJI of the hip, knee, shoulder, elbow or ankle. Participating centres include university or non-university tertiary healthcare facilities located in Switzerland. Episodes include likely and confirmed PJI, as defined by the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria. During routine clinical visits after revision surgery, data are collected and patients are followed-up thereafter for a minimum of two years. The primary objective is infection outcome and secondary objectives include functional outcome and patient satisfaction, and evaluation of host, infection, microbiological and treatment factors associated with treatment failure and poor functional outcomes, both in the overall population and across subgroups. A minimum of 329 patients would be needed to have sufficient statistical power to carry out these analyses.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Nora Renz
- Phone Number: +41316322111
- Email: nora.renz@insel.ch
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Christine Thurnheer
- Phone Number: +41316327732
- Email: Christine.Thurnheer@insel.ch
Study Locations
-
-
-
Aarau, Switzerland
- Recruiting
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Infection Prevention, Cantonal Hospital Aarau
-
Contact:
- Anna Conen
- Phone Number: +41628386812
- Email: Anna.Conen@ksa.ch
-
Bern, Switzerland
- Recruiting
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Bern University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Christine Thurnheer Zürcher
- Phone Number: +41 31 632 21 11
- Email: Christine.Thurnheer@insel.ch
-
Fribourg, Switzerland
- Recruiting
- Department of Medicine, HFR Fribourg-Hôpital Cantonal
-
Contact:
- Antonios Kritikos
- Phone Number: +41263062470
- Email: Antonios.Kritikos@h-fr.ch
-
Geneva, Switzerland
- Recruiting
- Orthopedic Surgery Service, Geneva University Hospitals
-
Contact:
- Truong-Thanh Pham
- Phone Number: +41223723311
- Email: truong-thanh.pham@hug.ch
-
Lausanne, Switzerland
- Recruiting
- Department of Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Sylvain Steinmetz
- Phone Number: +41213149403
- Email: Sylvain.Steinmetz@chuv.ch
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ≥18 years of age
- Revision surgery of any large prosthetic joint (i.e., hip, knee, shoulder, ankle, or elbow) performed for a suspected or confirmed periprosthetic joint infections at any of the participating study centres. This includes patients who were previously treated at another hospital and referred to a participating study centre if data on a transferred patient from the previous institution are available, complete, and archived in the institutional patient information system, and the patient underwent at least one surgery at a participating institution.
- Obtained written informed consent
- Periprosthetic joint infections diagnosis likely or confirmed according to European Bone and Joint Infection Society criteria
Exclusion Criteria:
- Documented objection to subsequent use of personal health data
- Patient follow-up outside of Switzerland
- Diagnosis "periprosthetic joint infections unlikely" according to European Bone and Joint Infection Society criteria
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of infection failure
Time Frame: Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
|
Rate of incident periprosthetic joint infection (according to European Bone & Joint Infection Society criteria) or infection-related death.
Types of failure include i) persistent or recurrent PJI with the same pathogen or no detected pathogen (i.e., treatment failure) and ii) a new infection caused by a pathogen different from the index episode.
|
Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean of range of motion measurement (hip)
Time Frame: Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
|
Range of motion measurements validated in orthopaedic and traumatology practice for those with a hip replacement.
|
Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
|
|
Mean of range of motion measurement (knee)
Time Frame: Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
|
Range of motion measurements validated in orthopaedic and traumatology practice for those with a knee replacement.
|
Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
|
|
Percent using any analgesics
Time Frame: Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
|
Percent using any analgesics drugs to relieve pain.
|
Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
|
|
Percent using walking aids (for lower extremity)
Time Frame: Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
|
Percent using a walking aid for those who had joint replacements of the lower extremities.
|
Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
|
|
Mean of EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire score
Time Frame: Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
|
Mean of the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) score, including patient mobility/independency in daily life and quality of life.
Range of scores 0 (dead) and 1 (full health).
|
Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
|
|
Mean of subjective evaluation of pain
Time Frame: Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
|
Mean of subjective evaluation of pain using a visual pain scale (1-10 points).
Higher scores indicate worse pain.
|
Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
|
|
Percent of adverse events from antibiotic treatment
Time Frame: Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
|
Percent of overall adverse events associated with antimicrobial treatment (including the need for treatment modification).
|
Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
|
|
Percent requiring surgical intervention
Time Frame: Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
|
Percent requiring surgical intervention (including the need for additional revision).
|
Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Nora Renz, Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR, Lew D, Zimmerli W, Steckelberg JM, Rao N, Hanssen A, Wilson WR; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Executive summary: diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Jan;56(1):1-10. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis966.
- Koh CK, Zeng I, Ravi S, Zhu M, Vince KG, Young SW. Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is the Main Cause of Failure for Modern Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 11,134 Knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Sep;475(9):2194-2201. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5396-4. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
- Vuorinen M, Makinen T, Rantasalo M, Huotari K. Effect of a multidisciplinary team on the treatment of hip and knee prosthetic joint infections: a single-centre study of 154 infections. Infect Dis (Lond). 2021 Sep;53(9):700-706. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2021.1925341. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
- Karczewski D, Winkler T, Renz N, Trampuz A, Lieb E, Perka C, Muller M. A standardized interdisciplinary algorithm for the treatment of prosthetic joint infections. Bone Joint J. 2019 Feb;101-B(2):132-139. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B2.BJJ-2018-1056.R1.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2021-01791
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Infection as Complication of Medical Care
-
University of ZurichCompletedInfection as Complication of Medical CareSwitzerland
-
Prof. Dr. med. Arno FriggSuspendedComplication of Surgical or Medical CareSwitzerland
-
St. Andrew's General Hospital, Patras, GreeceCompletedComplication of Surgical and Medical Care.Greece
-
University of Witwatersrand, South AfricaCompletedComplication of Surgical and Medical Care, UnspecifiedSouth Africa
-
University of NebraskaCompletedAir Embolism as A Complication of Medical CareUnited States
-
Hannover Medical SchoolRecruitingComplication of Surgical Procedure | Complication,Postoperative | Complication of Anesthesia | Complication of Medical CareGermany
-
Shangkun Liu (200966)CompletedPostoperative Complications | Complication of Medical Care
-
Stefan Gilg, MD, PhDUnknownLiver Failure as A Complication of Care
-
Boris Gala LopezMcGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University...WithdrawnLiver Failure as A Complication of Care | 30-day Mortality
-
University Hospital, LinkoepingRecruitingMRI | Liver Resection | Liver Failure as A Complication of CareSweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland