Swiss Revision Cohort (REVCO)

Swiss Revision Cohort: a Nationwide, Multi-center, Prospective Periprosthetic Joint Infection Cohort Study

This study follows patients with infections after a joint replacement over time. During follow-up, treatment outcomes are carefully measured to determine whether the infection can be cured. In addition, factors that may change infection cure rates are examined, including the patient's overall health, the type of bacteria causing the infection, and the surgical and antibiotic treatments used. The goal is to understand what leads to more frequent cure and to improve future care.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients with periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) remains challenging. Successful management of PJI requires revision surgery of the prosthetic joint. The Swiss National Joint Registry (SIRIS) reported two-year revision rates of 2.5% for total hip arthroplasty and 3.3% for total knee arthroplasty in 2023, with infection being the most frequent cause of early revision (27.9% for hips and 20.6% for knees). Despite published guidelines, the management of PJI remains insufficiently standardized, primarily due to heterogeneous clinical presentations and limited availability of rigorous data from prospective studies and randomized controlled trials comparing interventions to improve outcomes. The presence of foreign material with biofilm formation further complicates the diagnosis and treatment of PJI, posing a significant challenge for clinicians necessitating close collaboration among specialists from various medical fields, including orthopaedic surgeons, microbiologists and infectious disease experts. A recent observational study suggests that a multidisciplinary team approach is associated with improved diagnostics, fewer surgeries, reduced length of hospital stay, and higher success rates.

This national cohort aims to describe the epidemiology, clinical phenotypes, management strategies and outcomes of patients with PJI. This is a national, multicentre, prospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study of patients who underwent revision for PJI of the hip, knee, shoulder, elbow or ankle. Participating centres include university or non-university tertiary healthcare facilities located in Switzerland. Episodes include likely and confirmed PJI, as defined by the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria. During routine clinical visits after revision surgery, data are collected and patients are followed-up thereafter for a minimum of two years. The primary objective is infection outcome and secondary objectives include functional outcome and patient satisfaction, and evaluation of host, infection, microbiological and treatment factors associated with treatment failure and poor functional outcomes, both in the overall population and across subgroups. A minimum of 329 patients would be needed to have sufficient statistical power to carry out these analyses.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

329

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Aarau, Switzerland
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Infectious Diseases and Infection Prevention, Cantonal Hospital Aarau
        • Contact:
      • Bern, Switzerland
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Infectious Diseases, Bern University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Fribourg, Switzerland
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Medicine, HFR Fribourg-Hôpital Cantonal
        • Contact:
      • Geneva, Switzerland
        • Recruiting
        • Orthopedic Surgery Service, Geneva University Hospitals
        • Contact:
      • Lausanne, Switzerland
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants who undergo revision surgery of a prosthetic hip, knee, shoulder, ankle, or elbow joint for suspected periprosthetic joint infection.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥18 years of age
  • Revision surgery of any large prosthetic joint (i.e., hip, knee, shoulder, ankle, or elbow) performed for a suspected or confirmed periprosthetic joint infections at any of the participating study centres. This includes patients who were previously treated at another hospital and referred to a participating study centre if data on a transferred patient from the previous institution are available, complete, and archived in the institutional patient information system, and the patient underwent at least one surgery at a participating institution.
  • Obtained written informed consent
  • Periprosthetic joint infections diagnosis likely or confirmed according to European Bone and Joint Infection Society criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Documented objection to subsequent use of personal health data
  • Patient follow-up outside of Switzerland
  • Diagnosis "periprosthetic joint infections unlikely" according to European Bone and Joint Infection Society criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of infection failure
Time Frame: Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
Rate of incident periprosthetic joint infection (according to European Bone & Joint Infection Society criteria) or infection-related death. Types of failure include i) persistent or recurrent PJI with the same pathogen or no detected pathogen (i.e., treatment failure) and ii) a new infection caused by a pathogen different from the index episode.
Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean of range of motion measurement (hip)
Time Frame: Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
Range of motion measurements validated in orthopaedic and traumatology practice for those with a hip replacement.
Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
Mean of range of motion measurement (knee)
Time Frame: Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
Range of motion measurements validated in orthopaedic and traumatology practice for those with a knee replacement.
Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
Percent using any analgesics
Time Frame: Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
Percent using any analgesics drugs to relieve pain.
Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
Percent using walking aids (for lower extremity)
Time Frame: Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
Percent using a walking aid for those who had joint replacements of the lower extremities.
Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
Mean of EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire score
Time Frame: Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
Mean of the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) score, including patient mobility/independency in daily life and quality of life. Range of scores 0 (dead) and 1 (full health).
Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
Mean of subjective evaluation of pain
Time Frame: Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
Mean of subjective evaluation of pain using a visual pain scale (1-10 points). Higher scores indicate worse pain.
Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
Percent of adverse events from antibiotic treatment
Time Frame: Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
Percent of overall adverse events associated with antimicrobial treatment (including the need for treatment modification).
Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
Percent requiring surgical intervention
Time Frame: Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.
Percent requiring surgical intervention (including the need for additional revision).
Up to 5 years. The outcome will be evaluated during the period from enrollment until the date of last clinical visit, adminstrative censoring, lost to follow-up, death; whichever occurs first.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nora Renz, Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 23, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Interested researchers can access all available data if a study proposal is approved by the Swiss Revision Cohort scientific board.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Unending

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infection as Complication of Medical Care

Subscribe