Effects of an Educational Intervention on Emotional Intelligence in School Students (EMCONMIGO)

December 11, 2018 updated by: Blanca Navarro Peral, Hospital Severo Ochoa

Effects of an Educational Intervention on Emotional Intelligence in School Students: Randomized Clinical Trial

Objectives: Evaluate the effect on emotional intelligence levels of an educational intervention.

Design: Randomized Clinical Trial

Methods: An intervention on emotional intelligence was conducted in a Primary School. Students were recruited and randomized into intervention or control group (no intervention) by class (cluster). Total sample was 179. Results were measured with EQi-YV and ERQ-CA questionnaires. Statistical analysis was made with Student's t and Mann-Whitney's U tests.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

179

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Madrid
      • Leganés, Madrid, Spain, 28911
        • Hospital Universitario José Germain

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 14 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be on 5th or 6th year of Spanish Primary Education.
  • Accept informed consent of the study.
  • Be able to read, understand and answer both questionnaires

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Revoque informed consent.
  • Be in two different classes from the school.
  • Absence to 25% or more of the lessons.
  • Answer less than 80% of any questionnaire.
  • Not completing both questionnaires.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group
Receives 6 lessons in 6 different weeks on Emotional Intelligence
6 lessons were given to the students in separated weeks by the same investigator. Lessons were 45-60 minutes long and each one was dedicated to one of the main aspects of emotional intelligence.
No Intervention: Control group
Receives no intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Elevation of levels of Emotional Intelligence with EQi-YV ("Emotional Quotient Inventory: youth version") questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Increment of at least 3 points of median puntuation of emotional intelligence using EQi-YV questionnaire. Range of puntuations: 60-240 points. EQi-YV is the method in Spanish with higher internal and external validity to measure emotional intelligence in children and teenager population. The participants must show their degree of agreement with 60 items on a Likert scale of 4 points (1: never happens to me, 4: it always happens to me). It consists of 5 subscales: general mood, adaptability, stress management, interpersonal skills and intrapersonal skills. All negative punctuations were positivized for analisis (5-n). Total value is obtained by the sum of the items and reflects the level of emotional intelligence. A higher value means a better condition for the patient.
6 weeks
Elevation of levels of Emotional Intelligence with ERQ-CA ("Emotional Regulation Questionary") questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Increment of at least 2 points of median emotional intelligence using ERQ-CA questionnaire. The ERQ-CA measures emotional regulation capacity, it has been validated in Spanish. ERQ-CA consists on 10 Likert items on a scale of 5 points (1: never happens to me; 5: it always happens to me). It is formed of two subscales: cognitive re-evaluation and emotional suppression. Total puntuation is obtained by the sum of the items and varies from 10 to 50. All negative puntuations were positivized for analisis (6-n). A higher value means a better condition for the patient.
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Elevation of levels of general mood subscale with EQi-YV ("Emotional Quotient Inventory: youth version") questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Increment of at least 1.5 points of median puntuation of general mood subscale using EQi-YV questionnaire. Range of puntuations 14-56. The participants must show their degree of agreement with items on a Likert scale of 4 points (1: never happens to me, 4: it always happens to me). It consists on 14 items of general mood (items 1, 4, 9, 13,19, 23, 29, 32, 37, 40, 47, 50, 56, 60). All negative punctuations were positivized for analisis (5-n). Total value represents the level of general mood. A higher value means a better condition for the patient.
6 weeks
Elevation of levels of adaptability subscale with EQi-YV ("Emotional Quotient Inventory: youth version") questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Increment of at least 1.5 points of median puntuation of adaptability subscale using EQi-YV questionnaire. Range of puntuations 10-40. The participants must show their degree of agreement with items on a Likert scale of 4 points (1: never happens to me, 4: it always happens to me). It consists on 10 items of adaptability (items 12, 16, 22, 25, 30, 34, 38, 44, 48, 57). All negative punctuations were positivized for analisis (5-n). Total value represents the level of adaptability. A higher value means a better condition for the patient.
6 weeks
Elevation of levels of stress management subscale with EQi-YV ("Emotional Quotient Inventory: youth version") questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Increment of at least 1.5 points of median puntuation of stress management subscale using EQi-YV questionnaire. Range of puntuations 12-48. The participants must show their degree of agreement with items on a Likert scale of 4 points (1: never happens to me, 4: it always happens to me). It consists on 12 items of stress management (items 3, 6, 11, 15, 21, 26, 35, 39, 46, 49, 54, 58). All negative punctuations were positivized for analisis (5-n). Total value represents the level of stress management. A higher value means a better condition for the patient.
6 weeks
Elevation of levels of interpersonal skills subscale with EQi-YV ("Emotional Quotient Inventory: youth version") questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Increment of at least 1.5 points of median puntuation of interpersonal skills subscale using EQi-YV questionnaire. Range of puntuations 11-44. The participants must show their degree of agreement with items on a Likert scale of 4 points (1: never happens to me, 4: it always happens to me). It consists on 11 items of interpersonal skills (items 2, 5, 10, 14, 20, 24, 36, 41, 45, 55, 59). All negative punctuations were positivized for analisis (5-n). Total value represents the level of interpersonal skills. A higher value means a better condition for the patient.
6 weeks
Elevation of levels of intrapersonal skills subscale with EQi-YV ("Emotional Quotient Inventory: youth version") questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Increment of at least 1.5 points of median puntuation of intrapersonal skills subscale using EQi-YV questionnaire. Range of puntuations 6-24. The participants must show their degree of agreement with items on a Likert scale of 4 points (1: never happens to me, 4: it always happens to me). It consists on 6 items of intrapersonal skills (items 7, 17, 28, 31, 43, 53). All negative punctuations were positivized for analisis (5-n). Total value represents the level of intrapersonal skills. A higher value means a better condition for the patient.
6 weeks
Elevation of levels of cognitive re-evaluation subscale with ERQ-CA ("Emotional Regulation Questionary") questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Increment of at least 1 point of median cognitive re-evaluation subscale using ERQ-CA questionnaire. Range of puntuations 6-30. The participants must show their degree of agreement with items on a Likert scale of 5 points (1: never happens to me; 5: it always happens to me). It consists on 6 items of cognitive re-evaluation (items 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10). All negative puntuations were positivized for analisis (6-n). Total value represents the level of cognitive re-evaluation. A higher value means a better condition for the patient.
6 weeks
Elevation of levels of emotional suppression subscale with ERQ-CA ("Emotional Regulation Questionary") questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Increment of at least 1 point of median emotional suppression subscale using ERQ-CA questionnaire. Range of puntuations 4-20. The participants must show their degree of agreement with items on a Likert scale of 5 points (1: never happens to me; 5: it always happens to me). It consists on 4 items of emotional suppression (items 2, 4, 6, 9). All negative puntuations were positivized for analisis (6-n). Total value represents the level of emotional suppression. A higher value means a better condition for the patient.
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Blanca Navarro Peral, Nurse resident in Mental Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 7, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 22, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 6, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 13, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2018

Last Verified

December 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • pos05/18

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Emotional Intelligence

Clinical Trials on Emotional Intelligence lessons

3
Subscribe