Educational Intervention to Increase the Emotional Competence of Patients With Oesogastric and Bronchopulmonary Cancers (EmoVie_K)

September 8, 2020 updated by: University Hospital, Lille

Effectiveness of an Educational Intervention Aimed at Increasing the Emotional Competence of Patients With Oesogastric and Bronchopulmonary Cancers as Compared to Standard Management

The aim of this study is to test whether a short educational intervention about emotional skills can improve survivor cancer patient emotional skills and quality of life. Half of participants will follow the educational intervention about emotional skills, while the other half will practice relaxation followed by a non-directive talking group. The educational intervention should give better results on patient emotional skills and quality of life than the control group.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

After the end of treatments, cancer patients face a difficult time because it is expected that they return to normal, but at the same time they still have to struggle with the aftermath of cancer and fear of recurrence. This is why there is room in this period for an intervention designed to help patients to cope with their emotions. . Patient emotional skills are patient abilities to identify, express and manage their emotions for the best possible psychological adjustment. In general population, emotional skills have been shown to be highly related to a better quality of life. In this randomized controlled study, bronchopulmonary and oesogastric cancer patients between 6 months and 2 years after the end of treatments will undergo either the emotional skills intervention (intervention group) or the relaxation group (control group).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

23

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lille, France
        • Hôpital Calmette,CHU

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥18 ans,
  • Oesogastric or bronchopulmonary cancer patients between 6 months and 2 years after the end of cancer treatments
  • Patient of the CHRU (Regional Teaching Hospital) of Lille,
  • Registered with a social security scheme
  • Speak and understand French language
  • Signature of the informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive disorders or unstabilized psychiatric disorders that may impair the ability of reasoning and thinking necessary to complete the questionnaires and attend workshops
  • Difficulty or deficiency that prevent the patient from a good understanding of the imperatives of the research
  • Any situation likely to significantly affect emotional competence during the study according to the investigator's judgment (in particular, ongoing psychotherapy )
  • Patients under judicial protection (guardianship or curators).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Emotional skills
3 group sessions where patients are going to learn how to identify, express and regulate their emotions
2-hour 3 group sessions
Other Names:
  • Emotional intelligence
Sham Comparator: Relaxation and talking group
3 group sessions where patients are going to follow relaxation instructions and after a non directive talking group about cancer
2-hour 3 group sessions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in patient emotional skills from baseline to 15 days after intervention
Time Frame: Baseline and 15 days after the end of the intervention
Variation of patient-reported Short Profile of Emotional Competence (S-PEC)questionnaire score from baseline to 15 days after the intervention (between 1 and 3 months)
Baseline and 15 days after the end of the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient emotional skills long term
Time Frame: T1 (15 days after the end of the intervention) and T2 (2 months after T1) : 2 months
Variation of patient-reported PEC (Profile of Emotional Competence) questionnaire score
T1 (15 days after the end of the intervention) and T2 (2 months after T1) : 2 months
Quality of life by Medical Outcome Study Health Survey Short Form-36 (MOS SF-36)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 15 days after the end of the intervention (T1), 2 months
Patient-reported health-related quality of life using the Medical Outcome Study Health Survey Short Form-36 (MOS SF-36)
Baseline (T0), 15 days after the end of the intervention (T1), 2 months
Patient participation in workshops
Time Frame: Between 2 weeks and 2 months
The percentage of patients who have attended the 3 group sessions
Between 2 weeks and 2 months
Patient adherence to exercises to do at home between sessions
Time Frame: Between 2 weeks and 2 months
The percentage of patients who have performed the suggested exercises at home between sessions
Between 2 weeks and 2 months
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: T1 (15 days after the end of the intervention) and T2 (2 months after T1)
Patient-reported satisfaction regarding the intervention using and ad hoc questionnaire
T1 (15 days after the end of the intervention) and T2 (2 months after T1)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 26, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 7, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 7, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2016_29
  • 2017-A00224-49 (Other Identifier: ID-RCB number, ANSM)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Digestive System Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Emotional skills

Subscribe