Comparing Analgesic Effects of Three Ultrasound Guided Regional Anesthetic Techniques in Pediatrics

March 28, 2022 updated by: Meltem Savran Karadeniz, Istanbul University

A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Analgesic Effects of Three Ultrasound-guided Regionel Anesthetic Techniques in Pediatrics: Caudal Analgesia, Transversus Abdominis Plane and Quadratus Lumborum Blocks

This study evaluates analgesic effects of ultrasound-guided (USG) regional anesthetic techniques; caudal block , transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and quadratus lumborum block (QLB) by comparing postoperative pain scores [ Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolabilty(FLACC) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)], first analgesic requirement time and total analgesic consumption in pediatrics undergoing lower abdominal surgery. We also aim to observe the side effects of these techniques such as nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, hypotension, respiratory depression.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Lower abdominal surgeries affect dermatomes T10-L1 and blocking these nerve roots provides effective postoperative analgesia. Neuroaxial blocks such as epidural and caudal blocks is considered the gold standart regional technique for pain management after lower abdominal surgery, blocking both somatic and visceral pain. Nowadays,US is increasingly used to perform caudal block, demostrating cannule placement and precise deposition of local anesthetic in the epidural space. On the other side truncal blocks as US-guided TAP block covers T10-L1 dermatomes and provides postoperative pain relief after lower abdominal surgery with lower complication rate rather than caudal block but it may not prevent traction on the peritoneal sac. QLB is rather a new regional technique blocking nerve roots close to paravertebral area affecting somatic and visceral nerve fibers. In our study we aim to compare postoperative analgesic effects of these three techniques in paediatrics. Our primary outcomes are pain scores(FLACC/VAS) and first additional analgesic requirement time. Secondary outcomes are total analgesic consumption, side effects (nausea, vomiting, itching, urinary retention, bradycardia, hypotension, respiratory depression), length of hospitalization and chronic pain due to incision after 2 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

135

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34
        • Istanbul University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • undergoing lower abdominal surgery
  • ASA(American Society of Anestesiology)1-2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • denial of patient or parents,
  • infection on the local anesthetic application area
  • infection in central nervous system
  • coagulopathy
  • brain tumours
  • known allergy against local anesthetics
  • anatomical difficulties
  • with preexisting cardiac dysfunction
  • with history of renal and/or hepatic dysfunction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Quadratus Lumborum Block
US-guided quadratus lumborum block will be performed with 0,5 ml/kg 0.25% Bupivacaine in the anterior layer of the thoracolumbar fascia between psoas major and quadratus lumborum muscles
% 0,25
Other Names:
  • Marcaine
Active Comparator: Transversus Abdominis Plane Block
US- guided transversus abdominis plane block will be performed with 0,5 ml/kg 0.25% Bupivacaine into the fascial plane between internal oblique muscle and transversus abdominis muscle
% 0,25
Other Names:
  • Marcaine
Active Comparator: Caudal Block
US-guided caudal epidural block will be applied to 0.7 ml/kg 0.25 % Bupivacaine up to a maximum of 20 mL
% 0,25
Other Names:
  • Marcaine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Face, Legs Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scores
Time Frame: up to 48 hours
It includes five categories of behavior, each scored on 0-2 point scale so that total score ranges from 0 to 10. Total scores of 0-3 is defined as mild or no pain, 4-7 as moderate, and 8-10 as severe pain.
up to 48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital stay
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 week
Hospitalisation
Through study completion, an average of 1 week
Number of patients who require rescue analgesic
Time Frame: up to 48 hours
Number of patients who require IV tramadol (1 mg/kg) at the first 2 hours and parasetamol in the 48 hours
up to 48 hours
First analgesic requirement time
Time Frame: Up to 48 hours
Duration of postoperative analgesia
Up to 48 hours

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of side effects
Time Frame: up to 48 hours
Nausea, vomiting
up to 48 hours
Incidence of complications
Time Frame: up to first week
Hematoma, dural puncture, infections
up to first week
Time to first mobilization
Time Frame: up to 48 hours
Time to first mobilization
up to 48 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 28, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

February 25, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia, Local

Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine

Subscribe