- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03780790
Comparing Analgesic Effects of Three Ultrasound Guided Regional Anesthetic Techniques in Pediatrics
March 28, 2022 updated by: Meltem Savran Karadeniz, Istanbul University
A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Analgesic Effects of Three Ultrasound-guided Regionel Anesthetic Techniques in Pediatrics: Caudal Analgesia, Transversus Abdominis Plane and Quadratus Lumborum Blocks
This study evaluates analgesic effects of ultrasound-guided (USG) regional anesthetic techniques; caudal block , transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and quadratus lumborum block (QLB) by comparing postoperative pain scores [ Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolabilty(FLACC) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)], first analgesic requirement time and total analgesic consumption in pediatrics undergoing lower abdominal surgery.
We also aim to observe the side effects of these techniques such as nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, hypotension, respiratory depression.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Lower abdominal surgeries affect dermatomes T10-L1 and blocking these nerve roots provides effective postoperative analgesia.
Neuroaxial blocks such as epidural and caudal blocks is considered the gold standart regional technique for pain management after lower abdominal surgery, blocking both somatic and visceral pain.
Nowadays,US is increasingly used to perform caudal block, demostrating cannule placement and precise deposition of local anesthetic in the epidural space.
On the other side truncal blocks as US-guided TAP block covers T10-L1 dermatomes and provides postoperative pain relief after lower abdominal surgery with lower complication rate rather than caudal block but it may not prevent traction on the peritoneal sac.
QLB is rather a new regional technique blocking nerve roots close to paravertebral area affecting somatic and visceral nerve fibers.
In our study we aim to compare postoperative analgesic effects of these three techniques in paediatrics.
Our primary outcomes are pain scores(FLACC/VAS) and first additional analgesic requirement time.
Secondary outcomes are total analgesic consumption, side effects (nausea, vomiting, itching, urinary retention, bradycardia, hypotension, respiratory depression), length of hospitalization and chronic pain due to incision after 2 months.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
135
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey, 34
- Istanbul University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
1 year to 12 years (Child)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- undergoing lower abdominal surgery
- ASA(American Society of Anestesiology)1-2
Exclusion Criteria:
- denial of patient or parents,
- infection on the local anesthetic application area
- infection in central nervous system
- coagulopathy
- brain tumours
- known allergy against local anesthetics
- anatomical difficulties
- with preexisting cardiac dysfunction
- with history of renal and/or hepatic dysfunction
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Screening
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Quadratus Lumborum Block
US-guided quadratus lumborum block will be performed with 0,5 ml/kg 0.25% Bupivacaine in the anterior layer of the thoracolumbar fascia between psoas major and quadratus lumborum muscles
|
% 0,25
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Transversus Abdominis Plane Block
US- guided transversus abdominis plane block will be performed with 0,5 ml/kg 0.25% Bupivacaine into the fascial plane between internal oblique muscle and transversus abdominis muscle
|
% 0,25
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Caudal Block
US-guided caudal epidural block will be applied to 0.7 ml/kg 0.25 % Bupivacaine up to a maximum of 20 mL
|
% 0,25
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Face, Legs Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scores
Time Frame: up to 48 hours
|
It includes five categories of behavior, each scored on 0-2 point scale so that total score ranges from 0 to 10.
Total scores of 0-3 is defined as mild or no pain, 4-7 as moderate, and 8-10 as severe pain.
|
up to 48 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Hospital stay
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 week
|
Hospitalisation
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 week
|
|
Number of patients who require rescue analgesic
Time Frame: up to 48 hours
|
Number of patients who require IV tramadol (1 mg/kg) at the first 2 hours and parasetamol in the 48 hours
|
up to 48 hours
|
|
First analgesic requirement time
Time Frame: Up to 48 hours
|
Duration of postoperative analgesia
|
Up to 48 hours
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of side effects
Time Frame: up to 48 hours
|
Nausea, vomiting
|
up to 48 hours
|
|
Incidence of complications
Time Frame: up to first week
|
Hematoma, dural puncture, infections
|
up to first week
|
|
Time to first mobilization
Time Frame: up to 48 hours
|
Time to first mobilization
|
up to 48 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Helpful Links
- Rectus sheath and transversus abdominis plane blocks in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
- Comparison of caudal epidural block and ultrasonography-guided transversus abdominis plane block for pain relief in children undergoing lower abdominal surgery.
- Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Children Undergoing Low Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
- Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane and Quadratus Lumborum Blocks
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
December 28, 2018
Primary Completion (Actual)
February 1, 2021
Study Completion (Actual)
February 25, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 20, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 18, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
December 19, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 6, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 28, 2022
Last Verified
March 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2018/1076
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anesthesia, Local
-
University Health Network, TorontoActive, not recruiting
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisINSERM UMR-942, Paris, France; M3DISIMRecruitingPrediction Models for Cardiovascular and Neurocognitive Disease Risk in the General Population (CME)Anesthesia, Local | AnesthesiaFrance
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyCompletedAnesthesia, Local | AnesthesiaGermany
-
Grünenthal GmbHTerminatedAnalgesia | Anesthesia, Local | AnesthesiaNetherlands
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyCompletedAnesthesia, Local | Anesthesia | Anesthesia; Adverse EffectGermany
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisINSERM UMR-942, Paris, France; M3DISIMRecruiting
-
Novocol Pharmaceutical of Canada, Inc.CompletedAnesthesia, Local | Dental Anesthesia | Anesthesia, ReversalUnited States
-
Kfir SiagNot yet recruiting
-
University Health Network, TorontoCompleted
-
Hams Hamed AbdelrahmanCompleted
Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedErector Spinae Plane Block | Post-operative Pain | Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)Egypt
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalRecruitingLaparoscopic Surgery | Transversus Abdominis Plane Block | Liposomal BupivacaineChina
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalRecruitingPain Management | Local Infiltration | Liposome Bupivacaine | Hemorrhoid SurgeryChina
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalRecruitingPain Management | Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) | Liposomal Bupivacaine | Rhomboid Intercostal BlockChina
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalRecruitingPain Management | Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) | Liposomal Bupivacaine | Local InjectionChina
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalRecruitingLaparoscopic Surgery | Transversus Abdominis Plane Block | Gynecologic Oncology Patient | Liposomal BupivacaineChina
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalRecruitingLaparoscopic Surgery | Local Infiltration | Liposomal BupivacaineChina
-
Massachusetts General HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Duke UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Sanming First HospitalNot yet recruitingPulmonary Nodule | Liposomal Bupivacaine