SEPREVEN: a Stepped-wedge Randomised Controlled Trial (SEPREVEN)

December 27, 2020 updated by: Dr Caeymaex Laurence

Study on Preventing Adverse Events in Neonates (SEPREVEN): a Stepped-wedge Randomised Controlled Trial to Reduce Adverse Event Rates in the NICU

Adverse events are frequent in Neonatal Intensive Care Units' (NICU) patients and account for a high morbidity and mortality. Possible severe adverse events are central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), ventilator and catheter associated adverse events and medication errors. Severity of the patient's outcome after an adverse event can be classified using the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Preventing (NCC MERP) Index for categorizing medication errors.

The study will test the hypothesis that rates of adverse events in NICU patients will be reduced by the implementation of an educational program for the NICU caregivers (nurses and physicians), consisting of strategies for recognizing and preventing adverse events in their unit. These strategies will be oriented to prevent CLABSI, medication errors, skin and nasal complications and ventilator and catheter-associated adverse events.

This trial has a stepped wedge cluster design, in which the NICUs from 12 hospitals in France will be randomized to the timing of implementation of the educational program.

In order to describe the adverse events occurring during the study period, an anonymous voluntary adverse event reporting system will be provided to the caregivers of the participating units. A nested study will examine how caregivers communicate with the patients' parents in case of adverse event (disclosure or not, and caregivers' reasons).

The rates of adverse events will be measured retrospectively using a neonatal NICU trigger tool.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

8000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alsace
      • Strasbourg, Alsace, France, 67000
        • CHU Strasbourg Hautepierre
    • Auvergne Rhône Alpes
      • Grenoble, Auvergne Rhône Alpes, France, 38000
        • CHU Grenoble
    • Hauts De France
      • Lille, Hauts De France, France, 59000
        • CHU Lille Jeanne de Flandres
    • Ile De France
      • Creteil, Ile De France, France, 94000
        • CHI Créteil
      • Le Kremlin Bicêtre, Ile De France, France, 94270
        • CHU Bicêtre, APHP
      • Paris, Ile De France, France, 75019
        • CHU Robert Debré, APHP
      • Poissy, Ile De France, France, 78300
        • CH Poissy
      • Pontoise, Ile De France, France, 95000
        • CH Pontoise René Dubos
      • St Denis, Ile De France, France, 93210
        • Centre Hospitalier Delafontaine
    • Normandie
      • Caen, Normandie, France, 14000
        • CHU Caen
    • Pays De La Loire
      • Angers, Pays De La Loire, France, 49000
        • CHU Angers
    • Provence Alpes Cote d'Azur
      • Nice, Provence Alpes Cote d'Azur, France, 06000
        • CHU Nice Archet

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 day to 4 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria :

  • Patients hospitalized during the study period in one of the 12 participating Neonatal Intensive Care Units
  • Corrected Gestational age not exceeding 42 weeks +6 days at the time of admission in the NICU
  • Length of hospitalisation in the NICU > 2 days
  • No parental objection to the anonymous data collection of their newborn(s)' clinical data, after written information

Exclusion Criteria:

  • More than 42 weeks +6 days of corrected gestational age on admission in the NICU
  • Length of hospitalization in the NICU < or = 2 days
  • Parental objection to the anonymous data collection of their newborn(s)' clinical data

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Cluster A
Out of the 12 participating NICUs, 4 NICUs are randomly assigned in Cluster A. The intervention (educational program for preventing adverse events and medical errors in the NICU) is implemented after a pre interventional period of 4 months. The intervention is implemented during 4 months. The length of the post interventional period is 12 months.
  • standardized educational program : learning how to retrospectively analyze causes of a medical error in the NICU in order to prevent it (compulsory)
  • implementation of a central line maintenance bundle and checklist, of a central line insertion bundle and checklist and of a daily goals bundle and checklist. (compulsory)
  • poster for prevention of extravasation injuries
Other: Cluster B
Out of the 12 participating NICUs, 4 NICUs are randomly assigned in Cluster B. The intervention (educational program for preventing adverse events and medical errors in the NICU) is implemented after a pre interventional period of 8 months. The intervention is implemented during 4 months. The length of the post interventional period is 8 months.
  • standardized educational program : learning how to retrospectively analyze causes of a medical error in the NICU in order to prevent it (compulsory)
  • implementation of a central line maintenance bundle and checklist, of a central line insertion bundle and checklist and of a daily goals bundle and checklist. (compulsory)
  • poster for prevention of extravasation injuries
Other: Cluster C
Out of the 12 participating NICUs, 4 NICUs are randomly assigned in Cluster C. The intervention (educational program for preventing adverse events and medical errors in the NICU) is implemented after a pre interventional period of 12 months. The intervention is implemented during 4 months. The length of the post interventional period is 4 months.
  • standardized educational program : learning how to retrospectively analyze causes of a medical error in the NICU in order to prevent it (compulsory)
  • implementation of a central line maintenance bundle and checklist, of a central line insertion bundle and checklist and of a daily goals bundle and checklist. (compulsory)
  • poster for prevention of extravasation injuries

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rates of adverse events (total number/1000 patient-days)
Time Frame: 20 months
Assessment of the effectiveness of the program on reducing the rates of adverse events (number of adverse events/1000 patient-days) (AEs) measured using a retrospective chart review with a NICU trigger tool (Sharek PJ et al. Pediatrics 2006;118(4):1332-1340). Out of the pool of patients included in the study, 3600 charts (60 charts per 4 months and per unit) will be randomly assigned to be reviewed using the NICU trigger tool. An adverse event is defined here as an injury, large or small, caused by the use (including non-use) of a drug, test, or medical treatment.(Trigger tool kit, Raju Ped Research). Preventable adverse events and non preventable adverse events secondary to expected complications or side effects are both included.
20 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of adverse events (Percentage of patient admissions with an adverse event) over time during the study period
Time Frame: 20 months
Assessment of the effectiveness of the program on reducing the rate of adverse events (percentage of patient admissions with an adverse event) measured using a retrospective chart review with a NICU trigger tool (Sharek PJ et al. Pediatrics 2006;118(4):1332-1340), over time during the inclusion period
20 months
Rate of adverse events (number of adverse events per 100 NICU admissions) over time during the study period
Time Frame: 20 months
Assessment of the effectiveness of the program on reducing the rates of adverse events (number of adverse events per 100 admissions) (AEs) measured using a retrospective chart review with a NICU trigger tool (Sharek PJ et al. Pediatrics 2006;118(4):1332-1340) over time
20 months
Rates of preventable adverse events (total number/1000 patient-days)
Time Frame: 20 months
Assessment of the effectiveness of the program on reducing the rates of preventable adverse events (number of adverse events/1000 patient-days) (AEs) measured using a retrospective chart review with a NICU trigger tool (Sharek PJ et al. Pediatrics 2006;118(4):1332-1340). Out of the pool of patients included in the study, 3600 charts (60 charts per 4 months and per unit) will be randomly assigned to be reviewed using the NICU trigger tool. An adverse event is defined here as an injury, large or small, caused by the use (including non-use) of a drug, test, or medical treatment. (see Trigger tool kit definitions and Raju Ped Research) Preventability is assessed according to the existence of an "error". Expected complications or side effects from therapeutic or diagnostic interventions are generally non-preventable, and hence are considered complications. (see Raju, Pediatric Research) Healthcare associated infections are considered preventable adverse events.
20 months
Rates of CLABSI, number per 1000 catheter-days in the 12 participating NICUs in France
Time Frame: 20 months
Assessment of the effectiveness of the program on reducing the rates of Central line associated blood stream infections defined using the Primary Blood Stream Infections and LCBSI criteria (CDC/NHSN Device-Associated Module BSI January 2015), collected prospectively in the 12 participating NICUs. Analysis will include subgroups according to patient's characteristics and contextual factors (nurse staffing, unit occupancy, type of unit).
20 months
Rates of unplanned extubations, number per 100 ventilator-days and number per 100 ventilator-hours in the 12 participating NICUs in France.
Time Frame: 20 months
Assessment of the effectiveness of the program on reducing the rates of adverse events caused/lead by unplanned extubations measured using the retrospective trigger tool chart review (Sharek PJ et al. Pediatrics 2006;118(4):1332-1340). Out of the pool of patients included in the study, 3600 charts (60 charts per 4 months and per unit) will be randomly assigned to be reviewed using the NICU trigger tool.
20 months
Identify factors associated with and consequences of Unprogrammed extubation in NICU patients
Time Frame: 20 months
Unprogrammed extubation: description of prospectively reported factors associated with UE (context and cause), and patients' characteristics, as well as HCP's assessment of preventability of this UE (multiple choices questionnaire) in the participating units. Prospective collection of outcome 30 minutes and 24 hours after UE (reintubation/ non invasive ventilation or spontaneous breathing and outcome severity grading) according to reported causal factors and patients' characteristics
20 months
Rates of severe adverse events
Time Frame: 20 months
Assessment of the effectiveness of the program on reducing the rates of severe adverse events collected using a multisource prospective voluntary anonymous collection. Results will include control charts, and include patients' characteristics and contextual factors over time.
20 months
Describe rates of medication errors in NICU patients
Time Frame: 20 months
Assessment of the effectiveness of the program on reducing the rates of adverse events related to medication errors, measured using the retrospective trigger tool chart review (Sharek PJ et al. Pediatrics 2006;118(4):1332-1340). Out of the pool of patients included in the study, 3600 charts (60 charts per 4 months and per unit) will be randomly assigned to be reviewed using the NICU trigger tool; A medication error is defined here as any preventable event that causes or leads to inappropriate medication use with patient harm while the medication is in the control of the health care professional in the NICU. (see Raju Ped Research).
20 months
Identify factors associated with and consequences of medication errors in NICU patients
Time Frame: 20 months
Type of medication, of error and consequences and patients' and unit's characteristics are collected prospectively in the participating NICUs
20 months
Identify factors associated with and consequences of catheter-related adverse in the NICU
Time Frame: 20 months
Type of adverse event, consequence and patients' and unit's characteristics are collected prospectively in the participating NICUs
20 months
Rates of catheter-related adverse events, number per 1000 catheter-days
Time Frame: 20 months
Assessment of the effectiveness of the program on reducing the rates of catheter-related adverse events collected prospectively and using the retrospective trigger tool chart review (Sharek PJ et al. Pediatrics 2006;118(4):1332-1340) in the 12 participating NICUs
20 months
Identify number and types of medical errors collected in the 12 NICUs in France
Time Frame: 20 months
Number and types of medical errors are defined as catheter related (central line), medication, ventilation, skin lesions, nasal injury, extravasation, enteral feeding, temperature control, unprogrammed extubation, surgical complications, diagnostic error or delay, parenteral fluid/nutrition adverse event, and, in existing, others. These "errors" are collected prospectively in each participating unit during the 20 months period, using a multi-source collection file (manual, anonymous and voluntary and/or institutional). A Medical Error is defined here as an error in health care, due to a failure of the planned action to be completed as intended, or using a wrong plan of action to achieve the goal, and excluding near misses. (see Raju Pediatric Research) Errors are included independently of the harm caused to the patient. Descriptions will include patients' characteristics and contextual factors.
20 months
Identify Severity of adverse events in the 12 participating NICUs in France
Time Frame: 20 months
Identify Severity of adverse events, rated prospectively using the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention Index for Categorizing Errors (NCC MERP, 2001)(including infectious and non infectious adverse events). Severity is described according to contextual factors and patients' characteristics.
20 months
Describe late-onset infections types and characteristics in NICU patients in France
Time Frame: 20 months
Late-onset infections are defined according to the January 2015 CDC/NHSN Surveillance Definitions for all types of Specific Types of infections, for Primary Blood Stream Infections and for neonatal Ventilator associated pneumonia (Hospital-Acquired infections for neonates). Clinical sepsis without laboratory proven infection is included. Description includes type on infection, clinical and bacteriological characteristics and type of consequence - data are collected prospectively by physicians. Descriptions will be done including patients' characteristics and contextual factors.
20 months
Skin tolerance to cutaneous antisepsis : Dermatitis score results before and after an antisepsis procedure for umbilical and/or PICC catheter insertion in premature neonates born less than 32 weeks gestational age and aged less than 15 days.
Time Frame: 20 months
Dermatitis scoring is based on the existing Dermatitis score used by Garland JS (Garland JS et al. J Perinatol 2009), traduced in french (Score sheet available on demand). Score ranges from 0 (no dermatitis) to 4, with severe dermatitis >= 2. Score is completed propectively by the nurse in care, before and untill 5 after the procedure. Scores wil be compared according to antiseptic procedure and patient's characteristics.
20 months
Description of Nasal scores results during the use of noninvasive nasal ventilation interfaces in neonates born less than 32 weeks of gestational age and aged less than 15 days
Time Frame: 20 months
The nasal trauma score is based on the score used by Collins (Collins CL et al, Eur J Ped 2014). Score is completed prospectively by the nurse in care of the patient, in the first week of nasal ventilation (after extubation or not). Rates and type of nasal lesions according to interface and patient's characteristics will be described.
20 months
Identify characteristics ad factors associated with severe extravasation injuries in the 12 NICUs
Time Frame: 20 months
Extravasation injuries from peripherally inserted short catheter score is rated from I to IV based on the classification described b are collected prospectively using the score described by Casanova (Casanova D et al, Br J Plastic Surgery 2001). Score is rated prospectively by nurse in care; for severe extravasation, context of extravasation (infused substances, site,...), patients' characteristics and consequences are collected prospectively.
20 months
Description of characteristics of disclosed and undisclosed adverse events to the patients' parents, caregivers' motivations, and perceived parental reactions
Time Frame: 20 months
For each collected adverse event, caregivers self-administered written questionnaire assessing of adverse event has been told to parent(s), heath care professional's reasons to disclosure it or not, and in case of disclosure, parental reactions according to health care professional (multiple choices)
20 months
Economical impact of the program
Time Frame: 20 months
Mortality (yes/no)
20 months
Economical impact of the program
Time Frame: 20 months
NICU length of stay (days)
20 months
Economical impact of the program
Time Frame: 20 months
Neurological complications (Intraventricular hemorrhage, leucomalacia) for prematures
20 months
Economical impact of the program
Time Frame: 20 months
Hospitalization data: morbidity for prematures bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 36 weeks (yes/no); severe retinopathia (yes/no); severe enterocolitis (yes/no)
20 months
Rate of positive and negative blood cultures in NICU patients suspected of late onset infection according to volume of blood culture
Time Frame: 20 months
Prospective record on volume of blood culture and results (positive/negative)
20 months
Description of safety culture in each of the 12 participating NICUs before and after patients' inclusion period
Time Frame: 20 months
Safety culture is measured by a questionnaire filled in by the healthcare providers of the 12 units, in the weeks before the beginning and after the end of the patients' inclusion period using the french traduction of the Hospital Survey On Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC)(http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/patientsafetyculture), named Questionnaire de mesure de la culture de sécurité des soins en milieu hospitalier, validated by the CCECQA. A comparison of the results before and after the study will be described globally and per unit.
20 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laurence Caeymaex, MD, PhD, CHI Creteil, Paris Est University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 23, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 8, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 4, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

November 6, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 29, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 27, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nosocomial Pneumonia

Clinical Trials on Education program for NICU caregivers

3
Subscribe