Intensive Ambulance-delivered Blood Pressure Reduction in Hyper-Acute Stroke Trial (INTERACT4)

December 23, 2023 updated by: Craig Anderson, The George Institute for Global Health, China
A multicentre, ambulance-delivered, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) study to assess the effects of hyperacute intensive blood pressure (BP) lowering initiated in ambulance setting on (i) functional outcome in patients with acute stroke (ii) safety in patients with confirmed acute stroke and other conditions that were initially suspected as acute stroke (i.e. stroke mimic).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

As an investigator initiated and conducted, multicentre, ambulance-delivered, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded outcome (PROBE) study. INTERACT4 aims to evaluate the effects of functional outcome according to an ordinal analysis of the full range of scores on the mRS, the safety in all randomised patients; reperfusion treatment (thrombolysis and/or thrombectomy) related symptomatic ICH (sICH, according to standard definitions), infarct size, the time to and overall rate of reperfusion treatment in AIS patients; hematoma volume and early expansion in ICH.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2425

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100088
        • The George Institute for Global Health
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200123
        • Shanghai East Hospital
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610000
        • Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, China
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610500
        • The First Affliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. age ≥18 years;
  2. Acute syndrome that is due to presumed acute stroke, defined as FAST(Face, Arm, Speech, Time) scores of ≥2 with an arm motor deficit and time ≤2 hours from last seen well;
  3. Systolic BP ≥150
  4. Able to provide brief informed consent (if a waver of consent is not approved by the ethics committee)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Coma - no response to tactile stimuli or verbal stimuli;
  2. Severe co-morbid disease (e.g. cancer, chronic airflow disease, severe dementia,severe heart failure,pre-stroke disability[needed help]);
  3. History of epilepsy or seizure at onset;
  4. History of recent head injury (<7 days);
  5. Hypoglycemia(glucose<2.8mmol/L)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group
If systolic blood pressure>180:IV Urapidil 25mg If systolic blood pressure>150 (or 5 mins after first bolus) : IV Urapidil 25mg and to maintain this level after admission to hospital in those with confirmed acute stroke for the next 7 days (or hospital discharge if earlier)
A standard treatment regime based on intravenous (IV) bolus of 25mg urapidil administered over 1 minute. For those patients initial systolic blood pressure 180, another 25mg urapidil bolus will be given if the systolic blood pressure level persists >150 after 5 minutes.
Other Names:
  • Intensive BP lowing
No Intervention: control group
To receive blood pressure management according to standard local guidelines which recommend blood pressure lowering in hospital if systolic level is >220mmHg. This level will be considered by ambulance staff as a threshold for treatment if considered clinically important.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
level of physical function
Time Frame: Day 90
Level of function defined across 7 categories of disability on the modified Rankin scale (mRS 0-6) in which scores of 0 or 1 indicate good function without or with symptoms but not disability, socress of 2 indicates slight disability but independence, 3 to 5 indicate increasing levels of disability (and dependency), and a score of 6 indicates death.
Day 90

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
number of patients with serious adverse events
Time Frame: Day 90
total number of serious adverse events reported during follow-up, according to standard definitions
Day 90
number of patients with any intracranial hemorrhage
Time Frame: Day 7
reperfusion treatment (thrombolysis/thrombectomy) related symptomatic intracerebral number of cases of intracranial hemorrhage, according to standard definitions
Day 7
size of cerebral infarction
Time Frame: Day 2
overall size of cerebral infarction on MRI within 2 days in cases of ischaemic stroke
Day 2
number of patients who receive reperfusion treatment
Time Frame: Day 0
total number of cases of reperfusion (thrombolysis and/or thrombectomy) in ischemic stroke
Day 0
time to use of reperfusion treatment
Time Frame: Day 0
time from symptom onset to reperfusion treatment in patients with ischemic stroke
Day 0
size of hematoma volume
Time Frame: Day 1
change in volume of hematoma from baseline to 24 hours, measured on brain imaging
Day 1
size of hematoma volume
Time Frame: Day 0
volume of hematoma at baseline measured on brain imaging
Day 0
death or major disability
Time Frame: Day 90

Level of function defined across 7 categories of disability on the modified Rankin scale (mRS 0-6) in which scores of 0 or 1 indicate good function without or with symptoms but not disability, socress of 2 indicates slight disability but independence, 3 to 5 indicate increasing levels of disability (and dependency), and a score of 6 indicates death.

mRS(3-6)

Day 90
Death
Time Frame: Day 90
Day 90
Disability
Time Frame: Day 90
Level of function defined across 7 categories of disability on the modified Rankin scale (mRS 0-6) in which scores of 0 or 1 indicate good function without or with symptoms but not disability, socress of 2 indicates slight disability but independence, 3 to 5 indicate increasing levels of disability (and dependency), and a score of 6 indicates death.
Day 90
death or dependency measured by a shift in NIHSS
Time Frame: day 1 and day 7
day 1 and day 7
Health related quality of life
Time Frame: day 90
according to the EQ-5D
day 90

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Craig Anderson, The George Institute for Global Health, China
  • Principal Investigator: Gang Li, Shanghai East Hospital, China
  • Principal Investigator: Jie Yang, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, China
  • Principal Investigator: Yapeng Lin, The First Affliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, China

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 23, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 26, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

January 2, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data will be shared with bona fide researchers after 1 year following conclusion of the study, based on a submitted protocol to the research office of The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney Australia

IPD Sharing Time Frame

1 year after conclusion of the study

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

genuine researcher with supporting institution protocol review and approval by the research office of The George Institute

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebrovascular Disorders

Clinical Trials on urapidil

3
Subscribe