Strength Training in Improving Pain and Quality of Life in Patients With Multiple Myeloma

April 7, 2023 updated by: Roswell Park Cancer Institute

Feasibility of Strength Training and Impact on Pain and Quality of Life in Patients With Multiple Myeloma

This trial studies how well strength training works in improving bone health, pain, and quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma. Weekly physical activity may improve bone recovery, reduce pain, and increase quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

  • I. To assess the feasibility of a 6 month, twice weekly supervised strength training intervention in patients with multiple myeloma. (Cohort 1)
  • II. To assess the feasibility of a 6 month behavioral intervention to prompt an increase in weekly physical activity in patient with multiple myeloma. (Cohort 2)

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess the adherence rate of patients during a 6 month intervention program.

II. To assess the eligibility and recruitment rate for the trial among patients with multiple myeloma.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

I. Comparison of disease activity parameters, physical activity level, clinical symptoms, medication, psycho-oncological parameters before, during and after intervention.

II. Determine factors that may influence a persons' willingness to participate in the trial.

III. Investigate "immune fitness" by frequencies and function of immune cell subsets in peripheral blood.

OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 cohorts.

COHRT 1 (STRENGTH TRAINING): Patients receive a Fitbit to track their physical activity, and complete an in-person personalized and supervised full-body strength training program over 1 hour twice weekly (BID) up to 52 sessions for 6 months.

COHORT 2 (BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTION): Patients receive a Fitbit to track their physical activity, and complete an unsupervised walking program daily at home, increasing physical activity stepwise weekly, for 6 months.

After completion of study, patients are followed up every 3 months for 1 year.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

65

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14263
        • Roswell Park Cancer Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 - 1
  • Have a diagnosis of multiple myeloma
  • Show no signs of comorbidities, myeloma symptoms, or treatment side effects that would put them in danger when participating in the study according to the physician's discretion
  • Are able to understand and follow assessment and training procedures
  • Participant or legal representative must understand the investigational nature of this study and sign an Independent Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board approved written informed consent form prior to receiving any study related procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current and symptomatic pathological fracture(s) or severely advanced instability of the musculo-skeletal system
  • Acute bone instability as assessed by whole body low-dose computed tomography and evaluated by an experienced neuro- and spine surgeon
  • Major comorbidities that would cause danger to the patient when participating in the study. Examples are cardiac or pulmonary and infectious diseases that would have a risk of progression if the patient took part in the study
  • Unwilling or unable to follow protocol requirements
  • Any condition which in the investigator's opinion deems the participant an unsuitable candidate to take part in study intervention (comorbidities, myeloma symptoms, treatment side effects)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cohort 2 (walking program)
Patients receive a Fitbit to track their physical activity, and complete an unsupervised walking program daily at home, increasing physical activity stepwise weekly, for 6 months.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Wear Fitbit
Complete a walking program
Other Names:
  • STEPS
  • STEPS Intervention
  • STEPS to Enhance Physical Activity (STEPS)
Experimental: Cohort 1 (strength training)
Patients receive a Fitbit to track their physical activity, and complete an in-person personalized and supervised full-body strength training program over 1 hour BID up to 52 sessions for 6 months.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Wear Fitbit
Complete strength training
Other Names:
  • Strength Training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility rate
Time Frame: At 6 months
Will be defined as the proportion of enrolled patients who are still on study at the end of 6 months. Analysis will be done via computing a two-sided 95% confidence interval for the true proportion using Clopper-Pearson method.
At 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence rate (Cohort 1)
Time Frame: At 6 months
Will be defined as the proportion of patients remaining on study at 6 months who complete >= 80% of the intervention activities. Analysis will be done via computing a two-sided 95% confidence interval for the true proportion using Clopper-Pearson method.
At 6 months
Adherence rate (Cohort 2)
Time Frame: At 6 months
Will be defined as the proportion of patients whose average daily step counts each week are at or above their goal for that week at least 20/26 weeks, or 80% of the weeks.
At 6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Differences in lab parameters
Time Frame: Before and after strength training program up to 1 year
Comparison of parameters before and after intervention for the exploratory endpoints will proceed using two-sided paired t-tests for significance at the alpha = 0.05 level for continuous measures, and sign- tests for ordinal outcomes. Multiple testing corrections will make use of Bonferroni adjustments.
Before and after strength training program up to 1 year
Clinical performance
Time Frame: Before and after strength training program up to 1 year
Comparison of parameters before and after intervention for the exploratory endpoints will proceed using two-sided paired t-tests for significance at the alpha = 0.05 level for continuous measures, and sign- tests for ordinal outcomes. Multiple testing corrections will make use of Bonferroni adjustments.
Before and after strength training program up to 1 year
Physical activity level
Time Frame: Before and after strength training program up to 1 year
Comparison of parameters before and after intervention for the exploratory endpoints will proceed using two-sided paired t-tests for significance at the alpha = 0.05 level for continuous measures, and sign- tests for ordinal outcomes. Multiple testing corrections will make use of Bonferroni adjustments.
Before and after strength training program up to 1 year
Pain
Time Frame: Before and after strength training program up to 1 year
Comparison of parameters before and after intervention for the exploratory endpoints will proceed using two-sided paired t-tests for significance at the alpha = 0.05 level for continuous measures, and sign- tests for ordinal outcomes. Multiple testing corrections will make use of Bonferroni adjustments.
Before and after strength training program up to 1 year
Polyneuropathy
Time Frame: Before and after strength training program up to 1 year
Comparison of parameters before and after intervention for the exploratory endpoints will proceed using two-sided paired t-tests for significance at the alpha = 0.05 level for continuous measures, and sign- tests for ordinal outcomes. Multiple testing corrections will make use of Bonferroni adjustments.
Before and after strength training program up to 1 year
Opioid and other drug consumption
Time Frame: Before and after strength training program up to 1 year
Comparison of parameters before and after intervention for the exploratory endpoints will proceed using two-sided paired t-tests for significance at the alpha = 0.05 level for continuous measures, and sign- tests for ordinal outcomes. Multiple testing corrections will make use of Bonferroni adjustments.
Before and after strength training program up to 1 year
Psycho-oncological parameters
Time Frame: Before and after strength training program up to 1 year
Comparison of parameters before and after intervention for the exploratory endpoints will proceed using two-sided paired t-tests for significance at the alpha = 0.05 level for continuous measures, and sign- tests for ordinal outcomes. Multiple testing corrections will make use of Bonferroni adjustments.
Before and after strength training program up to 1 year
Fatigue
Time Frame: Before, during and after strength training program
Comparison of parameters before and after intervention for the exploratory endpoints will proceed using two-sided paired t-tests for significance at the alpha = 0.05 level for continuous measures, and sign- tests for ordinal outcomes. Multiple testing corrections will make use of Bonferroni adjustments.
Before, during and after strength training program
Reasons why patients do not participate in the trial
Time Frame: Before and after strength training program up to 1 year
Comparison of parameters before and after intervention for the exploratory endpoints will proceed using two-sided paired t-tests for significance at the alpha = 0.05 level for continuous measures, and sign- tests for ordinal outcomes. Multiple testing corrections will make use of Bonferroni adjustments. This will be assessed by analysis of the screening questionnaires and the checklist.
Before and after strength training program up to 1 year
"Immune fitness" frequencies and function of immune cell subsets
Time Frame: Before and after strength training program up to 1 year
Will be measured in peripheral blood. Comparison of parameters before and after intervention for the exploratory endpoints will proceed using two-sided paired t-tests for significance at the alpha = 0.05 level for continuous measures, and sign- tests for ordinal outcomes. Multiple testing corrections will make use of Bonferroni adjustments. This will be assessed by analysis of the screening questionnaires and the checklist.
Before and after strength training program up to 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 17, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

November 10, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 28, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Plasma Cell Myeloma

Clinical Trials on Quality-of-Life Assessment

3
Subscribe