Information, Networks and Rewards to Optimise Adherence to Diabetic Services (INROADS)

March 18, 2021 updated by: Congdon Nathan, Sun Yat-sen University

Information, Networks and Rewards to Optimise Adherence to Diabetic Services: "INROADS in China": A Randomized Trial

This prospective, randomised controlled trial is to investigate whether the complex intervention, including incentives (inexpensive cellphone top-ups), information (viewing one's own fundus photos and receiving SMS informational reminders) and peer support (Diabetes clubs), improve compliance with eye care among rural persons living with diabetes in southern China.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Diabetes affects some 10% of rural-dwellers in southern China. Demand for care of both diabetes and DR is low in this population: Only 25% are in care for diabetes (vs 100% of a matched urban cohort), 0% were being treated for DR (vs 55% of the urban cohort) and 31% said they were likely/very likely to accept diabetic eyecare when it was described to them (vs 78% of the urban group). A simple intervention of informational SMS reminders could significantly increase knowledge about DR and satisfaction with care among rural dwellers, while tripling their compliance with scheduled eye examinations. However, even in the group receiving the SMS reminders, over half failed to present for exams. More effective interventions are needed.

Participants: All the participants with treated diabetes or HbA1c >=6.5% from the Guangdong (Yangjiang) centre of our population-based Rural Diabetic Eye Disease Survey. They must be aged 50-90 years, own a cell phone (ownership is > 95% in the area), have no mobility limitations precluding routine clinic visits or bilateral blindness (<6/120), and be capable of giving informed consent.

Randomisation: To avoid contamination, we are clustering recruitment and randomisation at the level of village and inviting participants in the two study groups to the Yangjiang eye screening centre for follow-up on different clinic days. Block randomization, at village level, will be balanced by the distribution of education levels and travel times from screening centre.

Intervention. All groups will be offered a brief video, already created and piloted, explaining basic information about diabetes and diabetic eye disease. The Intervention group will also receive (i) non-cash rewards (free eye care and modest mobile phone top ups in return for attendance at retinopathy screenings), the value of which will increase with the risk of vision loss (based on existing level of eye disease and HbA1c). (ii) Informational reminders delivered by SMS text 1 day and 1 week prior to scheduled eye exams. In keeping with health economic research,3 the reminders will emphasize anticipated regret: "Your next eye screening visit is next week, on dd/mm/yy. If you miss your eye screening visit, you might regret this if you subsequently lose your vision."; and (iii) peer and village health worker (VHW) networking (supported by the existing Orbis CREST project). Peer supporters will be a nominated family member or friend who has regular contact with the patient and a VHW or a community member with diabetes who has been trained to run monthly group educational sessions in the local village on optimum self-care and self-management of diabetes/DR. An important function of the family member or peer supporter is also to re-inforce the SMS informational reminders before the scheduled clinic visit.

Primary outcome measure: Proportion of scheduled eye care visits attended over 1 year. Secondary outcomes, not the direct target of our intervention, but which might be improved by a behavioural spill-over effect, will include: follow-up HbA1c; medication adherence; retinopathy grade and visual acuity in the better seeing eye.

Power and sample size: Assuming an effect size d= 0.44, and an attrition of 15% over two years, a full trial of 412 patients (42 villages in each of the two groups and 206 patients per group) would have 90% power (two sided alpha error 0.05).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

225

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Yangjiang, Guangdong, China
        • Yangxi hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • They must be aged 50-90 years;
  • Own a cell phone (ownership is > 95% in the area);
  • Have no mobility limitations precluding routine clinic visits or bilateral blindness (<6/120);
  • Be capable of giving informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have other serious eye disease;
  • Have mobility limitations precluding routine clinic visits or bilateral blindness (<6/120).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group
Cash rewards for the fellow up+SMS reminders for participants and their family+Showing retinal photos to participants+ Having the Diabetic Club+Watching brief video and basic explanation for disease
This is a multiple stimulus intervention study, and there are two intervention groups. One is the normal intervention group, and the other is the adjusted intervention group. The intensity of intervention in the latter group is based on the severity of diabetic disease.
This is a multiple stimulus intervention study, and there are two intervention groups. One is the normal intervention group, and the other is the adjusted intervention group. The intensity of intervention in the latter group is based on the severity of diabetic disease.
This is a multiple stimulus intervention study, and there are two intervention groups. One is the normal intervention group, and the other is the adjusted intervention group. The intensity of intervention in the latter group is based on the severity of diabetic disease.
This is a multiple stimulus intervention study, and there are two intervention groups. One is the normal intervention group, and the other is the adjusted intervention group. The intensity of intervention in the latter group is based on the severity of diabetic disease.
Experimental: Adjusted intervention group
Cash rewards for the fellow up+SMS reminders for participants and their family+Showing retinal photos to participants+Having the Diabetic Club+Watching brief video and basic explanation for disease( But the intensity of intervention based on the severity of diabetic disease)
This is a multiple stimulus intervention study, and there are two intervention groups. One is the normal intervention group, and the other is the adjusted intervention group. The intensity of intervention in the latter group is based on the severity of diabetic disease.
This is a multiple stimulus intervention study, and there are two intervention groups. One is the normal intervention group, and the other is the adjusted intervention group. The intensity of intervention in the latter group is based on the severity of diabetic disease.
This is a multiple stimulus intervention study, and there are two intervention groups. One is the normal intervention group, and the other is the adjusted intervention group. The intensity of intervention in the latter group is based on the severity of diabetic disease.
This is a multiple stimulus intervention study, and there are two intervention groups. One is the normal intervention group, and the other is the adjusted intervention group. The intensity of intervention in the latter group is based on the severity of diabetic disease.
Active Comparator: Control group
Watching brief video and basic explanation for disease
This basic explanation will be offered by professional doctors or nurses.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of scheduled eye care visits attended over 1 year
Time Frame: One year
The visits will be recorded during the 1 year
One year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Follow-up HbA1c
Time Frame: One year
This outcome will be recorded in the baseline and end-line examination
One year
Proportion of scheduled endocrine care visits attended over 1 year
Time Frame: One year
The outcome will be recorded during the 1 year
One year
Retinopathy grade in the better seeing eye.
Time Frame: One year
This outcome will be recorded in the baseline and end-line examination
One year
Visual acuity in the better seeing eye.
Time Frame: One year
This outcome will be recorded in the baseline and end-line examination
One year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nathan Congdon, MD, Zongshan Ophthalmic Center
  • Principal Investigator: Wenyong Huang, MD, Zongshan Ophthalmic Center
  • Study Director: Chunhui Chen, Yangxi People hospital, Guangdong
  • Study Chair: Congyao Wang, Zongshan Ophthalmic Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 8, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 15, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ZOC-INROADS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes

Clinical Trials on cash rewards for the fellow up

Subscribe