- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01644214
Extended Pessary Interval for Care (EPIC Study) (EPIC)
Extended Pessary Interval for Care (EPIC Study): Patient Preference for 3 Verus 6 Month Follow-up
Objectives: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition for which pessaries are commonly used in conservative treatment. Despite their prevalence, there is no literature to guide the management of pessaries. Our objective is to determine whether patients managed with a pessary for POP are more satisfied with follow-up at 3 or 6 month intervals and if there is any difference in complications rates between the two groups.
Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that there will be higher patient satisfaction in the group randomized to 6 month follow-up intervals and that there will be no difference in complication rates between the two follow-up groups.
Method: The investigators will conduct a prospective randomized control trial comparing patient satisfaction and complication rates between patients with pessaries randomized to either 3 or 6 month follow-up intervals over 1 year.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1Z5
- Women's College Hospital/Mount Sinai Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Females with POP who have opted for conservative management with a pessary
- Able to read and write English
- First time pessary users
- Successful fitting with a covered ring or Gellhorn pessary, as determined at the usual early follow-up visit 2-4 weeks after initial fitting (successful defined as: no expulsion on movement, squatting or valsalva, no urinary retention, no discomfort, and still retained pessary after 2 weeks)
- Patients agree to use vaginal estrogen (either tablet or cream twice weekly) during the study period; patients may not use a vaginal estrogen ring since this requires changing every 3 months, and will interfere with the study follow-up schedule
Exclusion criteria:
- Current presence of vaginal bleeding, vaginal abrasions or ulcers, or vaginal infection
- Significant cognitive impairment
- Pessary used for indication other than POP (ie. urinary incontinence)
- Use of a pessary that is not a covered ring or Gellhorn (i.e exclude cube, donut, etc.)
- Contraindications to vaginal estrogen
- Unsuccessful pessary fitting (successful defined as: no expulsion on movement, squatting or valsalva, no urinary retention, no discomfort, and still retained pessary after 2 weeks)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: Pessary Check at 3 months
Patients seen at 3 month intervals for pessary check-ups is the most common interval check in our clinic so this arm is considered the control group.
|
|
Experimental: 6 month Pessary Check
Those that will be seen at 6 month follow-up visits for pessary maintenance will be considered the experimental group of the study.
|
The standard of care is considered to be pessary checks every 3 months, therefore those that are checked every 6 months will be considered to be in the intervention group.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: At 6 months from study enrollment
|
To determine if patients managed with a pessary for POP are more satisfied with follow-up at 6 or 12 weeks over a one year period.
|
At 6 months from study enrollment
|
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: At 12 months from study enrollment
|
To determine if patients managed with a pessary for POP are more satisfied with follow-up at 6 or 12 weeks over a one year period.
|
At 12 months from study enrollment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pessary associated complications
Time Frame: Checked at all follow-up visits (3 and 6 months, depending on study group)
|
To determine if there is a difference in complication rates associated with indwelling pessaries between those that are seen at 6 week intervals and those that are seen at 12 week intervals, over a one year time period.
|
Checked at all follow-up visits (3 and 6 months, depending on study group)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Colleen D McDermott, MD, FRCSC, St. Michael's Hospital, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Thakar R, Stanton S. Management of genital prolapse. BMJ. 2002 May 25;324(7348):1258-62. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7348.1258. No abstract available.
- Samuelsson EC, Victor FT, Tibblin G, Svardsudd KF. Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Feb;180(2 Pt 1):299-305. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70203-6.
- Bugge C, Adams EJ, Gopinath D, Stewart F, Dembinsky M, Sobiesuo P, Kearney R. Pessaries (mechanical devices) for managing pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 18;11(11):CD004010. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004010.pub4.
- MacLennan AH, Taylor AW, Wilson DH, Wilson D. The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery. BJOG. 2000 Dec;107(12):1460-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11669.x.
- Fernando RJ, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Shah SM, Jones PW. Effect of vaginal pessaries on symptoms associated with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jul;108(1):93-9. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000222903.38684.cc.
- Schaffer JI, Wai CY, Boreham MK. Etiology of pelvic organ prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep;48(3):639-47. doi: 10.1097/01.grf.0000170428.45819.4e. No abstract available.
- Atnip SD. Pessary use and management for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2009 Sep;36(3):541-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2009.08.010.
- Pott-Grinstein E, Newcomer JR. Gynecologists' patterns of prescribing pessaries. J Reprod Med. 2001 Mar;46(3):205-8.
- Sarma S, Ying T, Moore KH. Long-term vaginal ring pessary use: discontinuation rates and adverse events. BJOG. 2009 Dec;116(13):1715-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02380.x.
- Powers K, Grigorescu B, Lazarou G, Greston WM, Weber T. Neglected pessary causing a rectovaginal fistula: a case report. J Reprod Med. 2008 Mar;53(3):235-7.
- Ko PC, Lo TS, Tseng LH, Lin YH, Liang CC, Lee SJ. Use of a pessary in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: quality of life, compliance, and failure at 1-year follow-up. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 Jan-Feb;18(1):68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.09.006.
- Lamers BH, Broekman BM, Milani AL. Pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse and health-related quality of life: a review. Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Jun;22(6):637-44. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1390-7. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
- Wu V, Farrell SA, Baskett TF, Flowerdew G. A simplified protocol for pessary management. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Dec;90(6):990-4. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00481-x.
- Gorti M, Hudelist G, Simons A. Evaluation of vaginal pessary management: a UK-based survey. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Feb;29(2):129-31. doi: 10.1080/01443610902719813.
- Adams E, Thomson A, Maher C, Hagen S. Mechanical devices for pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(2):CD004010. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004010.pub2.
- Crandall C. Vaginal estrogen preparations: a review of safety and efficacy for vaginal atrophy. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2002 Dec;11(10):857-77. doi: 10.1089/154099902762203704.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PessaryProtocol
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pelvic Organ Prolapse
-
Coloplast A/SCompletedPelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)United States
-
University of CalgaryAlberta Health services; Cook Group IncorporatedCompletedAnterior Pelvic Organ ProlapseCanada
-
University of British ColumbiaCompletedPelvic Organ Prolapse, Patient EducationCanada
-
Unity Health TorontoUnknownVoiding Dysfunction After Pelvic Organ Prolapse SurgeryCanada
-
Nykøbing Falster County HospitalZealand University Hospital; University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen; Copenhagen...UnknownBenign Hysterectomy | Postoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse | Suspension
-
University of MelbourneCompletedVaginal Hysterectomy | Pelvic Organ Prolapse Vaginal SurgeryAustralia
-
Mackay Medical CollegeRecruitingPelvic Organ Prolapse | Stage III and IV High Grade Pelvic Organ ProlapseTaiwan
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalUnknown
-
Charles University, Czech RepublicUnknownPelvic Organ Prolapse RecurrenceCzech Republic
-
Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education HospitalRecruitingPatients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse | Pectopexy | Lateral Suspension | Pop-q | Pisq-12Turkey
Clinical Trials on 6 month follow up for pessary check in the clinic setting
-
Lille Catholic UniversitySSR pédiatrique Marc SauteletRecruitingAdolescent Idiopathic ScoliosisFrance
-
Hamad Medical CorporationRecruitingDiabetes | Pre-diabetesQatar
-
Abramson Cancer Center of the University of PennsylvaniaCompletedCandidates for BRCA 1/2 Genetic TestingUnited States
-
Association de Recherche Clinique en RhumatologieRCTsCompletedAxial SpondyloarthritisNetherlands, France, Belgium
-
Eskisehir Osmangazi UniversityCompletedEssential Hypertension | Cardiovascular Disease Risk | Motivational Interview | Healthy Lifestyle BehaviorTurkey
-
Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisante)...Pharmaceutical Society of the Vaud Canton ("SVPh: Société Vaudoise de pharmacie... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceUnknownArterial Hypertension | Medication Nonadherence
-
Centre Hospitalier of ChartresActive, not recruitingCritical IllnessFrance
-
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal...Boehringer Ingelheim; GreyboxActive, not recruitingHeart Failure | Chronic Heart FailureCanada
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterWeill Medical College of Cornell University; McMaster UniversityCompleted