Comparing Bupivacaine, Lidocaine, and a Combination of Bupivacaine and Lidocaine for Labor Epidural Activation

August 17, 2020 updated by: Mark Powell, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Comparing Bupivacaine, Lidocaine, and a Combination of Bupivacaine and Lidocaine for Labor Epidural Activation: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study

This study will compare and determine the most ideal local anesthetic (LA) solution to activate a labor epidural: lidocaine, bupivacaine, or a combination of bupivacaine plus lidocaine.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The most common and effective method for controlling labor pains is a local anesthetic (LA) infusion through a lumbar epidural. To achieve adequate pain control during the first stage of labor - onset of contractions to complete cervical dilation - nerve fibers up to the T10 dermatome must be anesthetized. When a patient is in active labor and an epidural catheter is placed, the anesthesiologist must activate the epidural by administering LA through the epidural to promote spread of the LA in the epidural space to anesthetize the nerve fibers involved in the conduction of labor pains. The ideal LA to achieve this goal is one that would allow for the fastest onset to achieve quick pain relief with the fewest side effects.

Two commonly used LA to provide labor analgesia are bupivacaine and lidocaine. When low concentrations - 0.25% bupivacaine and 1% lidocaine - are used for labor analgesia, both of these LA can be administered safely with very little concern of major adverse effects associated with LA toxicity. Given that there is limited and conflicting evidence for the usefulness of the bupivacaine and lidocaine mixture especially as it relates to labor epidural activation, we hope to readdress these questions in an effort to determine whether or not the LA combination offers any distinct advantage over the individual LA. The investigators intend to determine the time it takes to achieve an adequate level (T10) for labor analgesia, the total spread of local anesthetic, and the degree of motor block as these factors will be important in determining the most optimal LA solution to activate a labor epidural. With the results from this study, the investigators hope to recommend a LA solution that will allow for the fastest pain relief in the laboring mother with the fewest side effects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35249
        • UAB Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant patients over the age of 19 who are scheduled for an induction of labor and request an epidural are eligible for the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age <19
  • allergy to the drug or drug class
  • preexisting neuropathy
  • history of back pain prior to pregnancy or history of back surgery
  • history of chronic opioid use
  • history of hypertension or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
  • congenital or acquired cardiac disease
  • contraindication to epidural placement (patient refusal, severe coagulopathy, infection at site of epidural needle insertion, severe hypovolemia)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1% Lidocaine
Patients randomized into the lidocaine group will receive 10 mL of 1% lidocaine
10 mL of 1% lidocaine
Other Names:
  • Lidoderm, Xylocaine, Recticare, Anecream,
  • Solarcaine, Anestacon, Cutiecaine, Lidocoll,
Active Comparator: 0.25% Bupivacaine
Patients randomized into the bupivacaine group will receive 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine
10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine
Other Names:
  • Marcaine and Sensorcaine
Active Comparator: Bupivacaine plus Lidocaine
Patients randomized into the bupivacaine group will receive 5 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine and 5 mL of 1% lidocaine.
5 mL of 1% lidocaine and 5 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine
Other Names:
  • Marcaine and Sensorcaine
  • Lidoderm, Xylocaine, Recticare, Anecream, Lmx4, Akten,

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Achieve an Adequate Epidural Level for Labor Analgesia
Time Frame: Baseline to 1 hour
time it takes to achieve a T10 dermatome level by pinprick. A T10 dermatome level is what is needed to control labor pain.
Baseline to 1 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients Who Achieve Adequate Analgesia
Time Frame: Baseline to 1 hour
The number of patients who received an adequate epidural level of T10 or higher
Baseline to 1 hour
Degree of Motor Block
Time Frame: Baseline to 1 hour
degree of motor block which means the amount of weakness in the legs experienced by the participants. this was determined by using the Bromage scale where 4 = greatest amount of motor block or muscle weakness and 0 = the least amount of motor block.
Baseline to 1 hour
Number of Patients Who Experienced of Maternal Hypotension
Time Frame: Baseline to 1 hour
Number of patients who experienced maternal hypotension defined as a blood pressure (BP) >20% decline from baseline and need for vasopressor therapy
Baseline to 1 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 8, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

September 9, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 31, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Labor Pain

Clinical Trials on 1% Lidocaine

Subscribe