Safety and Clinical Effectiveness of Pipeline™ Shield Devices for Intracranial Aneurysms (SCOPE-AUS)

December 9, 2019 updated by: Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service

The Safety and Clinical Effectiveness of Pipeline™ Flex Embolization Devices With Shield Technology™ in Patients With Intracranial Aneurysms: a Multicentre Retrospective Study of an Australian Cohort (SCOPE-AUS)

This observational, retrospective, single-arm, multi-centre cohort study will use real-world data (RWD) to develop real-world evidence (RWE) of the safety and clinical effectiveness of the Pipeline™ Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology™ in Australian patients that have received a flow diversion device to treat an intracranial aneurysm (IA). The medical records from 500 procedures completed at Gold Coast University Hospital in Queensland (QLD), Prince of Wales Hospital in New South Wales (NSW), and Sir Charles Gardiner Hospital in Western Australia (WA), will be analysed.

The study will report the risk and likelihood of stroke (ischaemic and haemorrhagic), delayed neurological adverse events and incomplete aneurysm occlusion within sub-groups of the patient cohort and determine the predictive or confounding factors that influence clinical outcomes under pragmatic or 'real-world' conditions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Methodology summary: Single-arm, longitudinal, retrospective, multi-centre cohort study. A collaboration of Australian Interventional Neuroradiologists will create a data bank of existing clinical and angiographic data extracted from medical records review. The data collection variables are pre-specified using grading scales and clinical assessment with the greatest reliability or significant to to accurately represent patient cohorts receiving treatment within all indications of use. The study will establish a minimum dataset to collect patient socio-demographics, aneurysm characteristics, device characteristics, and clinical outcomes for up to 500 procedures completed using Pipeline™ Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology™. A framework for data ab The prevalence, severity and outcomes of neurological adverse events of interest and bleeding events will be reported . Independent physician assessments of complete aneurysm occlusion from completed computed tomography scans (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans and Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) procedures will be determined according to the Raymond Roy Occlusion Classification (MRRC), O'Kelly Marotta scale (OKM) for aneurysm occlusion using flow diverting devices and the Consensus grading scale for endovascular aneurysm occlusion up to 12 months post procedure. Assessments of wall apposition and in-stent stenosis (ISS) will also be completed.

Quality Assurance plan includes - Framework data abstraction - manual of procedures, data dictionary, data abstraction manual, desired inter-rater reliability +0.80; intrarater reliability, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.75 - 0.9;

Medical imaging review assessed by assess aneurysm occlusion by an independent interventional neuroradiologist or a local physician operator that did not complete the primary procedure. Physician level of agreement - interrater reliability to be reported;

Independent physician review of all post-op strokes (ischaemic, haemorrhagic) cases to determine aetiology/mechanism;

Study personnel training; Site visits; remote data monitoring, data audits.

Statistical analysis plan include descriptive statistics and regression models to report prevalence, mortality, time-to-event analyses and estimations of risk; Counts of medical records with insufficient data for analysis or where the patient is identified as 'lost follow-up', this will be reported.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2000
        • Recruiting
        • Prince of Wales Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Jason D Wenderoth MBBS(Hons 1) FRANZCR
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Andrew Cheung BSc MBBS(Hons 1) FRANZCR
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Nathan Manning BApSci, BSci(Hons), MBBS, FRANZCR CCINR
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2170
        • Recruiting
        • Liverpool Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Nathan Manning BApSci, BSci(Hons), MBBS, FRANZCR, CCINR FRANZCR
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jason Wenderoth MBBS (Hons 1), FRANZCR
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Andrew Cheung BSc(Med), MBBS (Hons 1), FRANZCR
    • Queensland
      • Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, 4215
        • Recruiting
        • Gold Coast University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Henry (Hal) A Rice MBBS FRANZCR
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Henry (Hal) A Rice MBBS FRANZCR
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Laetitia E de Villiers MBCHB FRANZCR
    • Western Australia
      • Perth, Western Australia, Australia, 6009
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Albert Chiu MBBS (Hons) FRANZCR
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • William McAuliffe MBBS FRANZCR
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Timothy Phillips MBBS GDSA FRANZCR CCINR

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The population is comprised of Australian patients aged ≥ 18 years that have received Pipeline™ Flex Embolization Devices with Shield Technology™ during a standard of care procedure to treat an IA. The patient selection period extends from 01 April 2015 to 30 June 2018.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients ≥ 18 years of age
  • Medical records from patients that have received a Pipeline™ Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology™ inclusive of all indications such as an elective procedure, unscheduled procedure or emergency procedure for an unruptured or ruptured intracranial aneurysm(s) at each study site
  • Medical records from patients that have received other neurovascular therapies such as coils, intracranial stents etc. with a Pipeline™ Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology™ used as an adjunctive device during the index procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical records from patients that have not received a Pipeline™ Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology™ to treat an intracranial aneurysm

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
patients with intracranial aneurysm(s)
Standard of care elective, unscheduled or emergency procedures for the treatment of an unruptured or ruptured intracranial aneurysm(s) using a Pipeline™ Flex Embolization Device(s) with Shield Technology™
Neurointerventional procedures to treat intracranial (cerebral) aneurysms are minimally-invasive procedures performed by Interventional Neuroradiologists. The physician accesses the arterial system through a blood vessel in the groin followed by the insertion of a catheter. Pipeline™ Flex Embolization Device(s) with Shield Technology™,a flow diversion device, is implanted under high-magnification subtraction fluoroscopy, requiring the use of ancillary devices, such as micro-catheters and guidewires to complete the procedure under general anaesthetic. Procedural heparinisation and preloading with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) using acetyl-salicylic acid and P2Y12 inhibitors such as clopidogrel or prasugrel are required.
Other Names:
  • Neurointerventional procedure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of stroke (short-term)
Time Frame: 30 days
Prevalence and severity of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke post procedure
30 days
Mortality due to stroke (short-term)
Time Frame: 30 days
Number of deaths due to ischaemic and haemorrhagic post procedure
30 days
Morbidity due to neurological adverse events of interest (short-term)
Time Frame: 30 days
Prevalence of neurological adverse events of interest post procedure
30 days
Prevalence of stroke (long-term)
Time Frame: 12 months
Prevalence and severity of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke post procedure
12 months
Morbidity due to neurological adverse events of interest (long-term)
Time Frame: 12 months
Prevalence of neurological adverse events of interest post procedure
12 months
Mortality due to stroke (long-term)
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of deaths due to ischaemic and haemorrhagic post procedure
12 months
Mortality due to neurological adverse events of interest (long-term)
Time Frame: 12 months
Deaths due to other neurological adverse events of interest
12 months
All cause mortality
Time Frame: 12 months
Deaths due to any cause
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Aneurysm occlusion - Wall apposition
Time Frame: Day 0
Proportion of aneurysms with good wall apposition at post-operative time point
Day 0
Aneurysm occlusion - Consensus grading scale for endovascular occlusion (short-term)
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion of aneurysms with Grade 0 - 5 aneurysm occlusion; Grade 0 is complete aneurysm occlusion (better outcome; maximum score) Grade 5 is less than 25% aneurysm occlusion (worse outcome; minimum score)
6 months
Aneurysm occlusion - Consensus grading scale for endovascular occlusion (long-term)
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of aneurysms with Grade 0 - 5 aneurysm occlusion; Grade 0 is complete aneurysm occlusion (better outcome; maximum score) Grade 5 is less than 25% aneurysm occlusion (worse outcome; minimum score)
12 months
Aneurysm occlusion - O'Kelly Marotta Scale (OKM; short-term)
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion of aneurysms with Grade D1 aneurysm occlusion on the O'Kelly Marotta Scale. Grade D1 indicates completed aneurysms occlusion as seen on the arterial phase of the cerebral angiogram due to 0% filling (better outcome; maximum score). Grade A1 represents total filling of the aneurysm (>95%) as seen on the arterial phase of the cerebral angiogram (worse outcome; minimum score).
6 months
Aneurysm occlusion - O'Kelly Marotta Scale (OKM; long-term)
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of aneurysms with Grade D1 aneurysm occlusion on the O'Kelly Marotta Scale; Grade D1 indicates completed aneurysms occlusion as seen on the arterial phase of the cerebral angiogram due 0% filling (better outcome; maximum score). Grade A1 represents total filling of the aneurysm (>95%) as seen on the arterial phase of the cerebral angiogram (worse outcome; minimum score).
12 months
Aneurysm occlusion - Modified Raymond Roy Classification (MRRC; short-term)
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion of aneurysms with Class 1 occlusion. Class 1 indicates complete obliteration of the aneurysm neck, representing complete aneurysm occlusion (better outcome; maximum score). Class 3b indicates residual aneurysm with contrast along aneurysm wall, representing substantial blood flow into the aneurysm, poor occlusion of aneurysm neck (worst outcome; minimum score).
6 months
Aneurysm occlusion - Modified Raymond Ray Classification (MRRC; long-term)
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of aneurysms with Class 1 occlusion. Class 1 indicates complete obliteration of the aneurysm neck, representing complete aneurysm occlusion (better outcome; maximum score). Class 3b indicates residual aneurysm with contrast along aneurysm wall, representing substantial blood flow into the aneurysm, poor occlusion of aneurysm neck (worst outcome; minimum score).
12 months
Aneurysm occlusion - In-stent stenosis (ISS; short-term)
Time Frame: 30 days
Proportion of aneurysms with Grade 2-4 ISS; ISS is a focal area of parent cerebral vessel narrowing caused by thrombosis or intimal hypoplasia. Grade 0 indicates no ISS is present (better outcome, maximum score). Grade 4 indicates occlusion of the cerebral parent vessel (worst outcome, minimum score).
30 days
Aneurysm occlusion - In-stent stenosis (ISS; short-term)
Time Frame: 90 days
Proportion of aneurysms with Grade 2-4 ISS; ISS is a focal area of parent cerebral vessel narrowing caused by thrombosis or intimal hypoplasia.Grade 0 indicates no ISS is present (better outcome, maximum score). Grade 4 indicates occlusion of the cerebral parent vessel (worst outcome, minimum score).
90 days
Aneurysm occlusion - In-stent stenosis (ISS; long-term)
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion of aneurysms with Grade 2-4 ISS; ISS is a focal area of parent cerebral vessel narrowing caused by thrombosis or intimal hypoplasia.Grade 0 indicates no ISS is present (better outcome, maximum score). Grade 4 indicates occlusion of the cerebral parent vessel (worst outcome, minimum score).
6 months
Aneurysm occlusion - In-stent stenosis (ISS; long-term)
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of aneurysms with Grade 2-4 ISS; ISS is a focal area of parent cerebral vessel narrowing caused by thrombosis or intimal hypoplasia.Grade 0 indicates no ISS is present (better outcome, maximum score). Grade 4 indicates occlusion of the cerebral parent vessel (worst outcome, minimum score).
12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional outcomes - Modified Rankin Scale, nil disability
Time Frame: 90 days
Change in mRS from baseline mRS 0-1; mRS is a clinician-reported measure of global disability. Level 0 indicates no disability (better outcome, maximum score). Level 6 indicates death (worst outcome, minimum score).
90 days
Functional outcomes - Modified Rankin Scale, disability
Time Frame: 90 days
Change in mRS from baseline mRS 3-6; mRS is a clinician-reported measure of global disability. Level 0 indicates no disability (better outcome, maximum score). Level 5 indicates severe disability, bedridden, incontinent and requiring nursing care and attention (poor outcome, low score). Level 6 indicates death (worst outcome, minimum score).
90 days
Functional outcomes - number of days spent in hospital
Time Frame: 90 days
mean time in hospital, an intensive care unit, or rehabilitation facility
90 days
Functional outcomes - home time post stroke
Time Frame: 90 days
Number of days spent at home after a post-operative stroke
90 days
Procedural time
Time Frame: Day 0
Time from start to end of the procedure
Day 0
Dual anti platelet therapy (DAPT) - Assay values
Time Frame: Day 0
% inhibition - DAPT assay values demonstrating impaired platelet activity
Day 0
Bleeding events - The Bleeding Academic Research Consortium
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion, severity and classification of bleeding events
12 months
Re-treatment procedures
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of aneurysms requiring re-treatment procedures
12 months
Incomplete aneurysms occlusion
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of aneurysms with incomplete occlusion
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Henry (Hal) A Rice MBBS FRANZCR, Gold Coast University Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Laetitia E de Villiers MBCHB FRANZCR, Gold Coast University Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Jason D Wenderoth BSc MBBS (Hons 1) FRANZCR, Prince of Wales Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Albert Chiu MBBS (Hons.) FRANZCR, Sir Charles Gardiner Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Nathan Manning BApSci, BSci(Hons) MBBS FRANZCR CCINR, Liverpool Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 30, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 30, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 6, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 24, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 10, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

This study will comply with the Australian Government Data Sharing Policy, the NHMRC Open Access Policy and the Clinical Trials Registration and Results Information Submission rule.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

To align with national recommendations for data sharing, the SCOPE-AUS metadata (description of the data) shall be published in a metadata record through Research Data Australia Registry, an entity of the Australian National Data Service. The goal is to ensure that data that is unique to the discipline of Interventional Neuroradiology is available for reuse in future research purposes.

The SCOPE-AUS metadata will be available at 12 months following primary publication until 48 months.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access shall be conditional; re-users must be genuine researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an Ethics committee. Re-users are required to cite the SCOPE-AUS dataset in any scholarly outputs. This proposed strategy will uphold Australian privacy laws. The Sponsor/Coordinating Principal Investigator/SCOPE-AUS research team will ultimately retain oversight of all future uses of the data.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)
  • Analytic Code

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Clinical Trials on Pipeline™ Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology™

3
Subscribe