Pipeline Embolization for Intracranial Aneurysms

November 13, 2024 updated by: Zhujiang Hospital

Pipeline Embolization Device for Intracranial Aneurysm (PEDIA): a Prospective, Multicenter Cohort Focus on Safety, Efficacy, and Haemodynamics

This study collected the clinical, laboratory, and imaging data from patients with intracranial aneurysms, who underwent Pipeline implantation. The purpose of this study is to observe the safety, effcacy, and haemodynamics after Pipeline embolization.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study collected the clinical, laboratory, and imaging data from patients with intracranial aneurysms, who underwent Pipeline implantation. The purpose of this study is to observe the safety, effcacy, and haemodynamics after Pipeline embolization. The primary outcomes were aneurysmal occlusion status, incidence of in-stent stenosis, and functional prognosis. The secondary outcomes were hemodynamic changes before and after stent implantation.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
        • Recruiting
        • Zhujiang Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Xin Zhang, MD
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Xin Feng, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Xifeng Li, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients underwent Pipeline implantation for intracranial aneurysms

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Aged 22 to 75 years old, male or non-pregnant female;
  2. UIA was diagnosed by CTA, MRA, or DSA;
  3. The size of aneurysms is between 3 to 25mm;
  4. Understands the nature of the procedure and provision of written informed consent;
  5. Indications for FD implantation with or without adjunctive coiling;
  6. Is willing to return to the investigational site for follow-up according to our protocol.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. With contraindications to flow-diversion treatment or known allergy to cobalt-chromium alloy or contrast medium;
  2. Pregnancy or lactation;
  3. Coexist with other vascular lesions (coronary artery disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm, severe intracranial artery stenosis, arteriovenous malformation, dural arteriovenous fistula, Moyamoya disease, etc.);
  4. Parent vessel with a diameter <2.0 mm or ≥5.0 mm.;
  5. Unwilling to be followed up or likely to have poor treatment compliance;
  6. Life expectancy less than 3 years;
  7. Inability to receive anti-platelet or anticoagulant medication;
  8. Severe neurological deficit that renders the patient unable to live independently (modified Rankin score ≥4);
  9. Enrollment in another trial or other situations that the researcher deems unsuitable for inclusion in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Saccular aneurysms
Patients with saccular aneurysms were enrolled.
The patients undenwent Pipeline embolization device implantation with or without shield technique due to market availability, choice and preferences of the surgeon.
Non-saccular aneurysms
Patients with non-saccular (i.e., fusiform, dissecting, blood blister-like) aneurysms were enrolled.
The patients undenwent Pipeline embolization device implantation with or without shield technique due to market availability, choice and preferences of the surgeon.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The occlusion rate of the aneurysm
Time Frame: 1 years
The occlusion rate of the aneurysm at 6 months;O'Kelly Marotta classification: complete occlusion (D, entirely non-filling), near-complete occlusion (C, only entry remnant), and incomplete occlusion (A and B, subtotal and total filling).
1 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
in-stent stenosis
Time Frame: 1 years

In-stent stenosis is defined as a growth process beyond the limits of stent mesh, which appears as a visible gap between the vessel lumen filled with contrast agent and stent struts.

Stenosis ratio (SR) = [1-(actual diameter of the most stenotic segment with digital subtraction/actual diameter of stent measured on without digital subtraction)]*100%

When there was no appreciable gap, cases were described as patency. Intimal hyperplasia was labeled when the SR was less than 25 %. ISS was defined as an SR of ≥ 25 %, and the stenosis grade was classified as mild (25 % to 49 %), severe (50 % to 99 %), or lumen occlusion (SR = 100 %)

1 years
perioperative complications
Time Frame: 1 months
perioperative complications;such as arterial perforation, iatrogenic arterial dissection, embolization in previously uninvolved vascular territory, arterial access site hematoma, and retroperitoneal hematoma. Arterial perforation will be defined at angiography by the operator and associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Iatrogenic arterial dissection will be defined at angiography by the operator. Arterial access site hematoma will be assessed as a complication of arterial access puncture and defined by clinical examination and anatomic imaging. Retroperitoneal hematoma will be assessed as a complication of groin puncture and defined by imaging (ultrasound or CT or MR angiography). The definition of embolization in previously uninvolved vascular territory is noted after recanalization of the primary occlusion site, any vessel occlusions distal from the primary occlusion site are considered emboli due to periprocedural thrombus fragmentation.
1 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Efficacy, Self

Clinical Trials on Pipeline embolization device with or without shield technique

Subscribe