Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Observance Rehabilitation of Upper Limbs by Visual-motor Simulation Associated at Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Hemiparetic Patient Post-stroke (SIMSTIM)

Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Observance Rehabilitation of Upper Limbs by Visual-motor Simulation Associated at Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Hemiparetic Patient Post-stroke.

Although the mirror therapy is recognized as effective, its practice is difficult, especially with hemiplegic patients. It is difficult for them to understand, control the movements and carry out a double task with the two upper limbs. The implementation of a Computerized Mirror Therapy (CMT) with the Intensive Visual Simulation 3 (IVS3) device makes it possible to limit these problems by proposing pre-recorded sessions, not limited to the right or left hemi-space, and proposing a work on proximal motricity. Since the functional prognosis of the upper hemiplegic limb remains mostly unfavourable, a wide range of interventions should be proposed. There is currently a consensus to consider the use of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) stimulation in functional recovery after stroke as a method to enhance the effectiveness of training techniques. Although all motor therapies can theoretically benefit from increased effectiveness by the addition of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), Computerized Mirror Therapy (CMT) has a high potential for sensitivity to transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) due to the intensity of the motor training of the upper limb applied.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The primary objective of this study is to investigate the feasibility of a program combining Computerized Mirror Therapy (CMT) with dual- transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) stimulation by evaluating observance to hemiparetic stroke patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

9

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Saint-Étienne, France
        • CHU Saint-Etienne

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with first ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke for less than one year, having not recidivated since then and responsible for initially complete left or right hemiplegia
  • Modified Frenchay arm test score <70 (/ 100)
  • Without a neurological history other than stroke
  • Having signed the written consent and affiliated or entitled to a social security scheme

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with contraindications to transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) or Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) (brain metal implant, pacemaker, other implanted active medical device)
  • Patient who didn't have cerebral Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) imaging during their stroke
  • With complete lesion of the primary motor cortex
  • With alcohol / drug dependence
  • With psychiatric illness, cognitive impairment, uncontrolled disease / epilepsy, malignant disease, severe renal or pulmonary disease
  • With a history of disabling associated disease
  • With cerebellar syndrome
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patient with first ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke

Patient with first ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke will be included. They will have the following program Computerized Mirror Therapy (CMT) associated at transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). This program will consist of 5 sessions per week for 4 weeks (20 minutes).

In more, they will have the following tests: Tolerance Assessment Questionnaire, Ashworth's scale, Frenchay arm test, Abilhand questionnaire, Fugl-Meyer test, and Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS).

transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is device which consist in setting up an electrode on the skull of the patient to deliver the low intensity current.

Patient will have transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) at each session and at the same time of Computerized Mirror Therapy (CMT).

Computerized Mirror Therapy (CMT) will be realizing by the device Intensive Visual Simulation 3 (IVS3). Patient will have Computerized Mirror Therapy (CMT) at each session and at the same time of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS).
Other Names:
  • Intensive Visual Simulation3 (IVS3)
The Tolerance Assessment Questionnaire will be completed at the end of each session.
Ashworth's scale evaluates the resistance to stretching. This test will be completed before the start of the program, at the end of the program and one month after.

Frenchay arm test evaluates your abilities with the affected hand to perform several actions.

This test will be completed before the start of the program, at the end of the program and one month after.

Abilhand questionnaire evaluates your abilities to perform several activities in the daily life with your arm affected.

This test will be completed before the start of the program, at the end of the program and one month after.

Fugl-Meyer test evaluates your ability to perform different movements with all the joints of your arm affected.

This test will be completed before the start of the program, at the end of the program and one month after.

Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) sets therapeutic goals with the patient before the start of the program.

These goals will be checked at the end of the program and one month after.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of observance of the program Computerized Mirror Therapy (CMT) + transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
Time Frame: Up to Day 40
Rate of observance of the program CMT + tDCS. It is will be measured by the number of patients who will be finished the study.
Up to Day 40

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effect of the program Computerized Mirror Therapy (CMT) + transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) improving activities of the upper limb - measured by Frenchay arm test
Time Frame: Day 40

To evaluate the effect of the program Computerized Mirror Therapy (CMT) + transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) improving activities of the upper limb.

It is will be measured by Frenchay arm test.

Day 40
Effect of the program Computerized Mirror Therapy (CMT) + transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) improving activities of the upper limb - measured by Frenchay arm test
Time Frame: Day 70

To evaluate the effect of the program Computerized Mirror Therapy (CMT) + transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) improving activities of the upper limb.

It is will be measured by Frenchay arm test.

Day 70
occurrence of epileptic seizure
Time Frame: Day 40
Measure of tolerance of the program Intensive Visual Simulation 3 (IVS3) + transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) by the occurrence of epileptic seizure report by adverse event and serious adverse events.
Day 40
occurrence of Anxiety crisis
Time Frame: Day 40
Measure of tolerance of the program Intensive Visual Simulation 3 (IVS3) + transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) by the occurrence of anxiety crisis report by adverse event and serious adverse events.
Day 40
Tolerance Assessment Questionnaire
Time Frame: Up to day 70
Analysis the results of the Tolerance Assessment Questionnaire.
Up to day 70
Evaluation of the program by Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS)
Time Frame: Day 40
Analysis of evaluation of the program by Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) results.
Day 40
Evaluation of the program by Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS)
Time Frame: Day 70
Analysis of evaluation of the program by Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) results.
Day 70
Quantitative improvement of the deficiencies - Fugl-Meyer test
Time Frame: Day 40
Measure of the quantitative improvement of the deficiencies by analysis of Fugl-Meyer test results.
Day 40
Quantitative improvement of the deficiencies - Fugl-Meyer test
Time Frame: Day 70
Measure of the quantitative improvement of the deficiencies by analysis of Fugl-Meyer test results.
Day 70
Abilities to perform several activities - Abilhand questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 40
Analysis of abilities to perform several activities in the daily life by Abilhand questionnaire results.
Day 40
Abilities to perform several activities - Abilhand questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 70
Analysis of abilities to perform several activities in the daily life by Abilhand questionnaire results.
Day 70

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 20, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 7, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 14, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 24, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

Subscribe