- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03822689
Comparison of Ventilation Tubes Among Anesthetized Pediatrics
The Influences of Different Type of Ventilation Breathing Tube Among Children and Neonate Under General Anesthesia
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
- Device: Ventilator breathing tube F2220
- Device: Ventilator breathing tube F2216
- Device: Ventilator breathing tube F1520
- Device: Ventilator breathing tube F1516
- Device: Ventilator breathing tube U1016
- Device: Ventilator breathing tube U1516
- Device: Ventilator breathing tube CA20
- Device: Ventilator breathing tube CA16
Detailed Description
In previous research, initial mechanical ventilator settings about children were as following: 1.tidal volume 6 to 10 ml/kg of ideal body weight; 2.delta pressures of respiratory pressure should be <10 cmH2O in healthy patients; 3. respiratory pressures could be kept less than 28 to 30 cmH2O in patient with lung injury; 4. positive end-expiratory pressure was necessary, although the optimal level is unknown.
However, few researches discussed about Influences of different types of ventilation breathing tube. The investigators want to clarify the character about length, diameter, and material of the ventilation breathing tube under the ventilation system in relation to tidal volume, end tidal carbon dioxide, compliance among children and neonate.
During this study, the participants will be 100 children who were ASA class1, 2 and performed non-emergency, non-cardiac surgery, who will receive general anesthesia . The participants will divide into three groups according to different body weights (Group N: <4.5kg; Group T: 4.5~20kg; Group C: >20kg), and would receipt total eight type of ventilator breathing tube test. Primary outcome will be the difference of tidal volume, end tidal carbon dioxide and compliance. Besides, secondary outcome will be the change of body temperate under different gas flow (2L, and 5L).
Study Type
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Taipei, Taiwan, 104
- Mackay Memorial Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification 1&2
- undergo elective surgery
- intubation
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cardiac-pulmonary surgery
- Had respiratory related disease
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Gas flow:2L
use different type ventilator breathing tube as follow Ventilator breathing tube F2220-M: Folding; D: 22mm; L:2.0M Ventilator breathing tube F2216-M: Folding; D: 22mm; L:1.6M Ventilator breathing tube F1520-M: Folding; D: 15mm; L:2.0M Ventilator breathing tube F1516-M: Folding; D: 15mm; L:1.6M Ventilator breathing tube U1016-M: Unfolding; D: 10mm; L:1.6M Ventilator breathing tube U1516-M: Unfolding; D: 15mm; L:1.6M Ventilator breathing tube CA20-.M: Co-axis; L:2.0M Ventilator breathing tube CA16- M: Co-axis; L:1.6M
|
M: Folding D: 22mm; L: 2.0M
M: Folding; D: 22mm; L:1.6M
M: Folding; D: 15mm; L:2.0M
M: Folding; D: 15mm; L:1.6M
M: Unfolding; D: 10mm; L:1.6M
M: Unfolding; D: 15mm; L:1.6M
M: Co-axis; L:2.0M
M: Co-axis; L:1.6M
|
|
Active Comparator: Gas flow:5L
use different type ventilator breathing tube as follow Ventilator breathing tube F2220-M: Folding; D: 22mm; L:2.0M Ventilator breathing tube F2216-M: Folding; D: 22mm; L:1.6M Ventilator breathing tube F1520-M: Folding; D: 15mm; L:2.0M Ventilator breathing tube F1516-M: Folding; D: 15mm; L:1.6M Ventilator breathing tube U1016-M: Unfolding; D: 10mm; L:1.6M Ventilator breathing tube U1516-M: Unfolding; D: 15mm; L:1.6M Ventilator breathing tube CA20-.M: Co-axis; L:2.0M Ventilator breathing tube CA16- M: Co-axis; L:1.6M
|
M: Folding D: 22mm; L: 2.0M
M: Folding; D: 22mm; L:1.6M
M: Folding; D: 15mm; L:2.0M
M: Folding; D: 15mm; L:1.6M
M: Unfolding; D: 10mm; L:1.6M
M: Unfolding; D: 15mm; L:1.6M
M: Co-axis; L:2.0M
M: Co-axis; L:1.6M
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Tidal volume
Time Frame: From: 1 minute after endotracheal intubation, and vital signs include heart rate, blood pressure, EtCO2 did not change over 30%. To: eight types of tubes have already tested, up to 30 minutes after beginning
|
compared tidal volume besides different ventilation breathing tube
|
From: 1 minute after endotracheal intubation, and vital signs include heart rate, blood pressure, EtCO2 did not change over 30%. To: eight types of tubes have already tested, up to 30 minutes after beginning
|
|
End tidal carbon dioxide
Time Frame: From: 1 minute after endotracheal intubation, and vital signs include heart rate, blood pressure, EtCO2 did not change over 30%. To: eight types of tubes have already tested, up to 30 minutes after beginning
|
compared End tidal carbon dioxide besides different ventilation breathing tube
|
From: 1 minute after endotracheal intubation, and vital signs include heart rate, blood pressure, EtCO2 did not change over 30%. To: eight types of tubes have already tested, up to 30 minutes after beginning
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Body temperate
Time Frame: From: 1 minute after endotracheal intubation, and vital signs include heart rate, blood pressure, EtCO2 did not change over 30%. To: eight types of tubes have already tested, up to 30 minutes after beginning
|
compared Body temperate about different gas flow(2L,5L)
|
From: 1 minute after endotracheal intubation, and vital signs include heart rate, blood pressure, EtCO2 did not change over 30%. To: eight types of tubes have already tested, up to 30 minutes after beginning
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- von Goedecke A, Brimacombe J, Hormann C, Jeske H-, Kleinsasser A, Keller C. Pressure support ventilation versus continuous positive airway pressure ventilation with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized crossover study of anesthetized pediatric patients. Anesth Analg. 2005 Feb;100(2):357-360. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000143563.39519.FD.
- Feldman JM. Optimal ventilation of the anesthetized pediatric patient. Anesth Analg. 2015 Jan;120(1):165-175. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000472.
- Kneyber MC. Intraoperative mechanical ventilation for the pediatric patient. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2015 Sep;29(3):371-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
- Glenski TA, Diehl C, Clopton RG, Friesen RH. Breathing circuit compliance and accuracy of displayed tidal volume during pressure-controlled ventilation of infants: A quality improvement project. Paediatr Anaesth. 2017 Sep;27(9):935-941. doi: 10.1111/pan.13164. Epub 2017 May 15.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 19MMHIS025e
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.