- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04348357
Utilizing Telemedicine for Delivery of Postoperative Care (Telemedicine)
Utilizing Telemedicine for Delivery of Postoperative Care Following Minimally-invasive Gynecologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Project title: Utilizing telemedicine for delivery of postoperative care following minimally-invasive gynecologic surgery: A randomized controlled trial
Principal Investigator: Steven Radtke MD FACOG Co-Investigators: Randle Umeh MD Research Associate: Martha Chavez, MPA Biostatistician: Zuber Mulla, Ph.D., Professor Affiliations: Texas Tech University Health Science Center El Paso, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine
Background:
The wide-spread use of minimally invasive techniques in gynecologic surgery has brought several tangible benefits to patients including faster-recovery times, shorter hospital stays, decreased risk of long term complications, to name a few. 1-3 Technological advances such as the development of robotic assistance have allowed to further expand the number of cases that can be performed via a minimally invasive approach.4 The shift has been such that the landscape regarding operative routes in gynecologic surgery has completely reversed, with now the majority of cases being performed laparoscopically. 5 Although much has changed intraoperatively, the surrounding structure of an operative has lagged. Specifically, preoperative and post-operative visits are still conducted in a similar way than how it was done 20 years ago. Despite leaps in technology, the field of gynecologic surgery has been slow to widely implement these advances into perioperative practice. One of the specific areas of opportunity is the postoperative visit. It is common practice in the majority of fields to have a visit with the patient approximately 2 weeks after surgery. The objective of this visit is to evaluate how the patient has been progressing, examine the wound site(s), and discuss pathology results from any specimens that were removed during the procedure.
The logistics of this visit involve blocking a time-slot in an established clinic day. The patient is required to transport herself to the clinic site. Once checked-in, there may be a waiting period before being placed in a room for the practitioner to conduct the visit. Once the visit is started, as long as there are no issues, the duration of the interaction may range on average between 3-7 minutes.
Despite these visits being short and usually straight-forward, the invested time that patients have to dedicate is substantially greater than the actual interaction with the clinician. Furthermore, because of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery, many patients have already returned to work by the time of the postoperative visit which may result in a disruption of their daily work schedule.
The ubiquitousness of high-speed internet and mobile phones have allowed for the field of telemedicine to thrive in recent years.6,7 Although wide-spread application of this modality has not been implemented in the field of gynecologic surgery, other areas such as urology and pediatrics have successfully implemented telemedicine programs, specifically for postoperative patients, yielding promising results. 8,9 The investigators propose a pilot project in which enrolled patients undergoing major gynecologic surgery will be randomized to either a traditional office postoperative visit or a telemedicine postoperative visit. The two groups will then be compared on a variety of metrics including clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction and time.
Objectives
- Determine if there are differences in patient satisfaction between traditional postoperative visits and telemedicine postoperative visits
- Determine the difference in time invested from the patient's side and clinicians side in order to complete the postoperative visit interaction
- Analyze if there is a difference between groups regarding visits to the emergency department related to the surgery, delayed postoperative complications, etc.
Hypothesis Patient satisfaction will be greater in the telemedicine group. The total time invested will be decreased. There will be no difference in visits to the emergency department or unrecognized postoperative complications
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
El Paso, Texas, United States, 79905
- Texas Tech University Health Scince Center El Paso
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion criteria
- Female patients between ages 18-60
- Have access to smart-phone with video/audio and internet capabilities
- Undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery that requires a postoperative visit
- Total laparoscopic hysterectomy
- Laparoscopic removal of adnexal structures
- Laparoscopic excision of endometriosis
Exclusion criteria
- Patient unwilling to participate
- The patient is unwilling to install and utilize the telemedicine app on their smartphone.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Traditional Visit
Patients come to the office for a traditional postoperative visit
|
Patient comes to the office to receive routine postoperative care
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Tele-medicine
Patients receive postoperative care via telemedicine
|
A video-call application hosted by Texas Tech University Health Science Center El Paso and easily accessible from mobile phones or video-enabled PCs will be used (webex teams)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
PSQ-18 General Satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery (1-2 weeks after postoperative visit)
|
General satisfaction component from PSQ-18 (Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18).
Ranges from 1 to 5, with 5 being the maximum score (favorable), and 1 being the minimum score (unfavorable).
|
1 month after surgery (1-2 weeks after postoperative visit)
|
|
PSQ-18 Technical Quality
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery (1-2 weeks after postoperative visit)
|
Technical Quality component from PSQ-18 (Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18).
Ranges from 1 to 5, with 5 being the maximum score (favorable), and 1 being the minimum score (unfavorable)
|
1 month after surgery (1-2 weeks after postoperative visit)
|
|
PSQ-18 Interpersonal Manner
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery (1-2 weeks after postoperative visit)
|
Interpersonal manner component from PSQ-18 (Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18).
Ranges from 1 to 5, with 5 being the maximum score (favorable), and 1 being the minimum score (unfavorable)
|
1 month after surgery (1-2 weeks after postoperative visit)
|
|
PSQ-18 Communication
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery (1-2 weeks after postoperative visit)
|
Communication component from PSQ-18 (Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18).
Ranges from 1 to 5, with 5 being the maximum score (favorable), and 1 being the minimum score (unfavorable)
|
1 month after surgery (1-2 weeks after postoperative visit)
|
|
PSQ-18 Time Spent With Doctor
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery (1-2 weeks after postoperative visit)
|
"Time spent with doctor" component from PSQ-18 (Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18).
Ranges from 1 to 5, with 5 being the maximum score (favorable), and 1 being the minimum score (unfavorable)
|
1 month after surgery (1-2 weeks after postoperative visit)
|
|
PSQ-18 Accessibility and Convenience
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery (1-2 weeks after postoperative visit)
|
"Accessibility and convenience" component from PSQ-18 (Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18).
Ranges from 1 to 5, with 5 being the maximum score (favorable), and 1 being the minimum score (unfavorable)
|
1 month after surgery (1-2 weeks after postoperative visit)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Actual Visit Time
Time Frame: Measured at the time of postoperative visit, which occurred 2-3 weeks after surgery
|
Time that the actual postoperative encounter took, originally to be measured in seconds, and then rounded to the nearest minute for reporting.
This is measured at the time of visit by research staff using a stop-watch.
|
Measured at the time of postoperative visit, which occurred 2-3 weeks after surgery
|
|
Visits to Emergency Department
Time Frame: 30 days after surgery
|
Number of visits to the emergency department occurring after the postoperative visit, within 30 days of the surgery
|
30 days after surgery
|
|
Phone-calls to Office
Time Frame: 30 days after surgery
|
Number of phone-calls made to office for postoperative complaints occurring after postoperative visit, within 30 days of the surgery
|
30 days after surgery
|
|
Time Dedicated by Patient to Complete Visit
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery (1-2 weeks after postoperative visit)
|
Patient estimate of the time it took them to complete the postoperative visit, including transportation to and from the clinic (if randomized to office visit group).
Measured in minutes (increments of 5)
|
1 month after surgery (1-2 weeks after postoperative visit)
|
|
Number of Patients Who Desired to Switch Groups
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery (1-2 weeks after postoperative visit)
|
Participants who responded YES when asked during the final interview (1-2 weeks after postoperative visit) if they would've switched groups if given the chance.
|
1 month after surgery (1-2 weeks after postoperative visit)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Steven Radtke, MD, TTUHSCEP
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- E19110
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery
-
KADİR TEOMANAnkara City Hospital BilkentEnrolling by invitationGynecologic Laparoscopic SurgeryTurkey
-
Ankara Etlik City HospitalNot yet recruitingGynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery | Regional Anesthesia BlockTurkey
-
University of California, RiversideCompletedGynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery | Minimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresUnited States
-
University of South FloridaTampa General HospitalCompletedLaparoscopic Surgery | Laparoscopy | Insufflation | Gynecologic Surgical ProceduresUnited States
-
Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan UniversityUnknownLaparoscopic Gynecologic SurgeryChina
-
Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research HospitalCompletedMechanical Ventilation | Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery | Peak Inspiratuar PressureTurkey
-
Assiut UniversityCompleted
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalRecruitingLaparoscopic Surgery | Transversus Abdominis Plane Block | Gynecologic Oncology Patient | Liposomal BupivacaineChina
-
Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de MontréalMedasense Biometrics LtdCompletedHysterectomy | Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery | OophorectomyCanada
-
Ziv HospitalUnknownInfluence of Perioperative Fluid Regime on Intraocular Pressure During Laparoscopic Gynecologic SurgeryIsrael
Clinical Trials on Office visit
-
Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterWithdrawn
-
The Cleveland ClinicCompletedSatisfaction, PatientUnited States
-
The Cleveland ClinicTerminated
-
Rothman Institute OrthopaedicsUnknown
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityCompletedAutism Spectrum DisorderUnited States
-
Arizona State UniversityTerminatedHealth Service Research on TelemedicineUnited States
-
University of PittsburghUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterCompletedPelvic Organ Prolapse | Patient PreparednessUnited States
-
Massachusetts General HospitalCompletedAcne VulgarisUnited States
-
Case Western Reserve UniversityUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical CenterCompleted
-
University of CatanzaroUnknownPediatric ALL | Chronic Venous InsufficiencyItaly