- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03839264
Optimal Screening Program in Detecting Stenosis and Predicting Thrombosis in Hemodialysis Graft
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Available Screening Tools in Detecting Stenosis and Predicting Incipient Thrombosis in Arteriovenous Graft for Hemodialysis: a Comparative Analysis
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
A well-functioning vascular access (a system that allows the blood of the patient to leave the body, be brought to the artificial kidney or dialyzer to be cleaned and return the cleansed blood to the body) is essential for providing adequate life-sustaining treatment in patients with end stage renal disease on maintenance haemodialysis.
The preferred long-term vascular access is the arteriovenous fistula (AVF), which is created using the vessels of the patient by surgically connecting an artery with a superficial vein to increase the blood flow (Qa) in the venous system, which after few weeks will dilate (maturation) allowing the insertion of two needles, one to carry the blood to the dialyzer (arterial needle), and the other to return the cleansed blood to the body (venous needle) with the aid of a dialysis machine, equipped with a blood pump and pressure sensors at the level of the "arterial" and "venous" needle to monitor for needles dislodgment.
Unfortunately, the high prevalence of vascular disease of the haemodialysis patients makes difficult to create an adequate AVF in as many as 20 to 60% of the patients.
In these persons, a valid alternative is the arteriovenous graft: in graft method an artery is surgically connected to a vein with a short piece of synthetic soft tube which is implanted under the skin. Needles are inserted in the graft during the dialysis treatment.
Compared to an AV, however, graft is at higher risk of complications. The most frequent and feared complication is thrombosis (i.e. the formation of blood clot inside the graft).
Usually, thrombosis is the consequence of an underlying stenosis (i.e. a greater than 50% narrowing of the vessel or graft lumen by comparison with the lumen of a normal adjacent vessel or graft due to the thickening of the vessels and/or the graft wall) and its hemodynamic consequences of decreasing the access blood flow (Qa) and/or increasing pressure within the graft. Less frequently thrombosis occurs in the absence of significant stenosis and may be triggered by a drop in the patient's arterial blood pressure (hypotension).
All vascular access guidelines recommend regular non-invasive screening programs of grafts for timely identification of a stenosis associated with some type of functional or hemodynamic impairment, because its repair may prevent thrombosis and lengthen the useful life of the access.
Non-invasive screening methods include clinical monitoring (i.e. noting signs of access dysfunction during the haemodialysis session) and surveillance, which uses special equipment either to assess the hemodynamic consequences of stenosis by measuring Qa and static venous intra-access pressure ratio (VAPR) or to visualize the stenosis by means of duplex ultrasound (DU).
In graft, all guidelines have opted for surveillance. However, they also state that there is insufficient evidence to prefer one technique to another because of the lack of adequate comparative studies.
Indeed, the great majority of the studies have evaluated the ability of detecting stenosis and predicting incipient thrombosis (within 1 to 3 months) by one surveillance method, and very few have compared two-to-three techniques at the best (1).
The purpose of the investigators was to compare in the same graft population the diagnostic performance of all the currently available screening tools in detecting stenosis and predicting incipient thrombosis (to identify the best criteria for elective stenosis repair).
The primary aim of the study was to identify an optimal screening program to reduce the risk of thrombosis in graft by assessing the diagnostic accuracy (i.e. sensitivity, false positive rate, positive and negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operator curve) of all the available screening tools and the occurrence of acute hypotension and identify the best threshold/s for continuous variables in a) detecting stenosis, b) predicting incipient thrombosis (within a 4-month period following graft assessment for stenosis).
The following screening methods will be tested:
- Monitoring: monitoring was considered positive when signs of graft dysfunction were noted during dialysis (difficult cannulation, aspiration of clots, inability to achieve the prescribed dialysis pump blood flow (Qb), excessive post-dialysis bleeding) or a >0.3 drop in single pool dialysis dose was documented;
- Dynamic pressures: pressures were measured in the initial 5 minutes of dialysis, using 15 G needles and detected by the dialysis machine using the pressure sensors connected with the "arterial" (dynamic arterial pressure in mmHg: dAP) and "venous" needle (dynamic venous pressure in mmHg: dVP) at a standard Qb 250 ml/min. dAP was expressed as the ratio with Qb (dAP/Qb, in mmHg/ml/min);
- Derived static intra-access venous pressure ratio (VAPR): was obtained in the initial 5 minutes of dialysis by the dVP, Qb, haematocrit and systemic systolic and diastolic blood pressure values, according to literature in mmHg/mmHg;
- Access blood flow (Qa, in ml/min) was measured by the Ultrasound dilution method during dialysis (QaU) using the Transonic HD03 device, in the same dialysis session in which pressures were measured: each value is the mean of triplicate measurement;
- Duplex Ultrasound (DU) was performed just before dialysis or in a non-dialysis day, using the Logiq 7 device (General Electric, Milwaukee). Grayscale and color imaging of the of the whole access circuit (feeding artery, graft and draining veins) was performed in the longitudinal and transverse plane to assess the presence of stenosis. Each stenosis was graded with regard to: (1) location (by defining "inflow stenosis" any stenosis located at the feeding artery, the arterial anastomosis or intragraft upstream the cannulation area, and "outflow stenosis" any stenosis located intragraft downstream the cannulation area, at the venous anastomosis, or at the draining veins); and (2) percent lumen reduction, determined by the ratio of the minimal intraluminal diameter at the stenosis to the nearby normal vessel or graft segment using an electronic calliper: a stenosis was considered significant (StD) when the lumen reduction was > 50% and/or downstream spectral doppler peak velocity of systolic blood flow (PSV) was > 400 cm/sec. Measurement of Qa is made in a straight portion of the brachial artery in the mid-third of the upper arm. The diameter of the blood flow was measured directly on the vessel thanks to b-flow color technology. Sampling volume was placed in the centre of the lumen and in the longitudinal plane. Typically, measurements were obtained over a sequence of 3 to 5 cardiac cycles (to allow for time-averaged mean velocities, TAV). TAV was calculated directly by the device from a doppler spectral waveform by the duplex scanner system. The Qa (in ml/min) is calculated by the device as the product of the artery diameter and the TAV. The mean value of at least 3 separate measurements was reported.
Subsequently all grafts underwent the biplanar Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA), our gold standard for stenosis detection. The access was visualized in its entirety from the feeding artery to the right atrium seeking for the presence of stenosis. Each stenosis was graded with regard to location and degree as outlined for DU and was considered significant (StA) when the lumen reduction was > 50%. To ensure blinding the investigator performing DSA was unaware of the results of the other screening strategies.
Secondary aims of the study were to assess:
- the relationship between Qa measurement by ultrasound dilution (QaU) and DU (QaD);
- the intra-assay variability of QaU and QaD measurements;
- The inter-assay variability of QaU, dAP/Qb, dVP, and VAPR measurements;
- the concordance of 2 different radiologists in detecting presence of significant stenosis (>50%) at DSA.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Verona, Italy, 37135
- Azienda Ospedaliera Integrata di Verona - Policlinico Borgo Roma
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All the patients with a polytetrafluroethylene (PTFE) graft as haemodialysis vascular access who were treated at the haemodialysis Unit of the Polyclinic of B.go Roma Hospital in Verona during the recruitment period and who agreed to take part at the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- No one.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Graft stenosis and thrombosis
Diagnostic performance for stenosis at angiography of non invasive screening tools (duplex ultrasound, access blood flow (Qa), dynamic and static dialysis machine venous pressures, dynamic dialysis machine arterial pressure, and monitoring) and incipient thrombosis (within 4-month period) of the presence and degree of stenosis at angiography, non invasive screening techniques and acute hypotensive episode/s during the follow-up
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Presence of a significant stenosis at DSA (yes/not)
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
presence of a greater than 50% reduction in the vessel or graft lumen diameter by comparison with the lumen diameter of a normal adjacent vessel or graft in mm/mm.
|
1 hour
|
Presence of significant stenosis at DU (yes/not)
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
presence of a greater than 50% reduction in the vessel or graft lumen diameter by comparison with the lumen diameter of a normal adjacent vessel or graft in mm/mm and/or a peak systolic velocity > 400 cm/sec at the stenotic site
|
30 minutes
|
Abnormal clinical monitoring (yes/not)
Time Frame: 15 minutes
|
signs of graft dysfunction noted during dialysis: difficult cannulation, aspiration of clots, inability to achieve the prescribed dialysis pump blood flow (Qb), excessive post-dialysis bleeding or a >0.3 drop in single pool dialysis dose
|
15 minutes
|
Qa measured by ultrasound dilution: QaU (ml/min)
Time Frame: 15 minutes
|
Qa was measured by the Ultrasound dilution method during dialysis using the Transonic HD03 device, in the same dialysis session in which pressures were measured: each value is the mean of triplicate measurement
|
15 minutes
|
Qa measured by DU: QaD (ml/min)
Time Frame: 10 minutes
|
Measurement of Qa is made in a straight portion of the brachial artery in the mid-third of the upper arm.
The diameter of the blood flow was measured directly on the vessel thanks to b-flow color technology.
Sampling volume was placed in the centre of the lumen and in the longitudinal plane.
Typically, measurements were obtained over a sequence of 3 to 5 cardiac cycles (to allow for time-averaged mean velocities, TAV).
TAV was calculated directly by the device from a doppler spectral waveform by the duplex scanner system.
The Qa (in ml/min) is calculated by the device as the product of the artery diameter and the TAV.
The mean value of at least 3 separate measurements was reported.
|
10 minutes
|
Dynamic arterial pressure / dialysis pump blood flow: dAP/Qb (mmHg/ml/min)
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
Dynamic arterial pressure (dAP) was measured in the initial 5 minutes of dialysis and detected by the dialysis machine using the pressure sensor connected with the "arterial" needle and expressed as the ratio with dialysis blood pump flow Qb.
|
5 minutes
|
dynamic venous pressure: dVP (mmHg)
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
Dynamic venous pressure (dVP) was measured in the initial 5 minutes of dialysis and detected by the dialysis machine using the pressure sensor connected with the "venous" needle
|
5 minutes
|
Derived static venous pressure ratio: VAPR (mmHg/mmHg)
Time Frame: 10 minutes
|
obtained in the initial 5 minutes of dialysis by the dVP, Qb, haematocrit and systemic systolic and diastolic blood pressure values, according to literature in mmHg/mmHg
|
10 minutes
|
occurrence of symptomatic acute hypotension during the follow up (yes/not)
Time Frame: 4 months
|
during the follow up an episode of acute symptomatic hypotension in the intra- and inter-dialytic interval was recorded.
Hypotension was defined as a sudden fall of systemic blood pressure associated with one or more of fainting palpitation, nausea, blurred vision, feeling weak or cold
|
4 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
correlation coefficient (r) between QaU and QaD measurements (ml/min / ml/mn)
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
the correlation between the Qa values measured by ultrasound dilution and DU (ml of blood flowing within the access per minute, ml/min)
|
30 minutes
|
Concordance for the presence of significant stenosis between two radiologists (yes/not)
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
the concordance of radiologist 1 and radiologist 2 in detecting the presence of significant stenosis at DSA.
|
1 hour
|
intra-assay coefficient of variation of QaU and QaD (%)
Time Frame: 15 minutes
|
the coefficient of variation was obtained by dividing the standard deviation by the mean value of multiple measurements
|
15 minutes
|
inter-assay coefficient of variation of QaU, dAP/Qb,dVP and VAPR (%)
Time Frame: 1 month
|
the coefficient of variation was obtained by dividing the standard deviation by the mean value of multiple measurements obtained over 1 week period for dAP/Qb, dVP and VAPR and within 1 month period for QaU
|
1 month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Nicola Tessitore, MD, AO Verona
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Tordoir J, Canaud B, Haage P, Konner K, Basci A, Fouque D, Kooman J, Martin-Malo A, Pedrini L, Pizzarelli F, Tattersall J, Vennegoor M, Wanner C, ter Wee P, Vanholder R. EBPG on Vascular Access. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007 May;22 Suppl 2:ii88-117. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm021. No abstract available.
- Vascular Access 2006 Work Group. Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006 Jul;48 Suppl 1:S176-247. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.04.029. No abstract available.
- Polkinghorne K; Caring for Australians with Renal Impairment (CARI). The CARI guidelines. Vascular access surveillance. Nephrology (Carlton). 2008 Jul;13 Suppl 2:S1-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2008.00992.x. No abstract available.
- Tessitore N, Bedogna V, Verlato G, Poli A. Clinical access assessment. J Vasc Access. 2014;15 Suppl 7:S20-7. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000242. Epub 2014 Apr 12.
- Frinak S, Zasuwa G, Dunfee T, Besarab A, Yee J. Dynamic venous access pressure ratio test for hemodialysis access monitoring. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002 Oct;40(4):760-8. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.35687.
- Krivitski NM. Theory and validation of access flow measurement by dilution technique during hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 1995 Jul;48(1):244-50. doi: 10.1038/ki.1995.290.
- Tessitore N, Bedogna V, Verlato G, Poli A. The rise and fall of access blood flow surveillance in arteriovenous fistulas. Semin Dial. 2014 Mar;27(2):108-18. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12187. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
- Tessitore N, Bedogna V, Melilli E, Millardi D, Mansueto G, Lipari G, Mantovani W, Baggio E, Poli A, Lupo A. In search of an optimal bedside screening program for arteriovenous fistula stenosis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Apr;6(4):819-26. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06220710. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- AOVerona
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Arteriovenous Graft Thrombosis
-
Medtronic EndovascularTerminatedArteriovenous Graft ThrombosisCanada
-
Straub Medical AGCompletedArteriovenous Graft ThrombosisCzechia
-
National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu BranchUnknownHemodialysis Access Failure (Disorder) | Stent-Graft Restenosis | Arteriovenous Graft | Drug-coated BalloonTaiwan
-
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio MarañonSpanish Society of NephrologyCompletedArteriovenous Fistula Stenosis | Arteriovenous Fistula ThrombosisSpain
-
Singapore General HospitalNational Medical Research Council (NMRC), SingaporeRecruitingBlood Vessel Prosthesis | Arteriovenous Shunt ThrombosisSingapore
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingArteriovenous Fistula Thrombosis
-
ShireTerminated
-
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal...Biotronik Canada IncCompletedArteriovenous Graft | Arteriovenous FistulaeCanada
-
Sonavex, Inc.National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)TerminatedArteriovenous Fistula | Arteriovenous GraftUnited States
-
Ain Shams UniversityNot yet recruitingArteriovenous Graft Site Pain
Clinical Trials on Graft stenosis and thrombosis
-
University Hospital, GrenobleSanofi; Ministry of Health, France; SFMV (Société Française de Médecine Vasculaire)CompletedVascular Diseases | Embolism and Thrombosis | Venous Insufficiency | Phlebitis | Pulmonary EmbolismFrance, Belgium, Guadeloupe
-
Portuguese Society of CardiologyAbbott Medical DevicesUnknownCoronary Artery Disease | Valvular Heart DiseasePortugal
-
Wuhan Asia Heart HospitalUnknownThrombosis | Biomarkers | Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia
-
University Hospital of FerraraCompletedMyocardial IschemiaItaly
-
G. d'Annunzio UniversityCompleted
-
Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho,...LEO Pharma; Diagnostica StagoUnknownCancer | Thrombosis | Biomarkers | ThromboembolismPortugal
-
Rennes University HospitalCompletedMyocardial Function of the Stenosis Aortic Valve Before and Beyond Valve ReplacementFrance
-
Bentley InnoMed GmbHShanghai Micro Medical Devices Co., Ltd.Active, not recruitingIliac Artery StenosisChina
-
University of HullWithdrawnRenal Failure | Arteriovenous FistulaUnited Kingdom
-
Mount Sinai Hospital, CanadaThe Arthritis Society, CanadaCompletedDegenerative Lumbar Spinal StenosisCanada