Loop Gain in the Reversion of OSA Treated by Either CPAP or Cardiac Valve Replacement

March 8, 2021 updated by: Ning Ding, Nanjing Medical University

The Role and Mechanisms of Loop Gain and Associated Parameters in the Reversion of OSA Treated by Either CPAP or Cardiac Valve Replacement

Sleep apnea including obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and central sleep apnea (CSA), are common in patients with cardiovascular disease. The prevalence of OSA is 2%-4% in general population and 16%-47% in surgical-heart failure patients.

The previous studies found that the sleep apnea types shifted from OSA to CSA after continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment or from CSA to OSA after heart surgery (cardiac valve replacement/ repair or heart transplantation) without the mechanism illuminated clearly. The recent studies found that the loop gain (LG) could predict the effect of upper airway surgery and CPAP treatment on the reversion of OSA. However, in patients with valvular heart disease, whether LG and related parameters can predict the therapeutic efficacy of CPAP or cardiac valve replacement is not expounded clearly.

The investigators' previous study found that there were different outcomes of sleep apnea after cardiac valve replacement: elimination or consistent. But the corresponding non-anatomic mechanisms was not clear. The investigators' preliminary experiment showed that the LG and related parameters were not improved while OSA improved by CPAP treatment; however, the recovery of OSA after cardiac valve replacement was closed related to the improvement of LG and related parameters.

The investigators speculated that, 1. LG and related parameters could predict OSA outcome of CPAP treatment or cardiac valve replacement. 2. non-anatomic mechanisms including LG and associated parameters, contributed to CPAP treatment and cardiac valve replacement were different. In this study, the investigators aimed to explore the relationship between LG and, outcomes of OSA and the regarding non-anatomic mechanisms in patient with heart valve disease.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Between January 31, 2020 and June 30, 2023, 300 patients with valvular heart disease waiting for cardiac valve replacement in Department of Cardiovascular Surgery were screened for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) by full-night polysomnography. Of them, 40 OSA patients were enrolled and randomly received CPAP treatment and non-CPAP treatment (20:20).

The CPAP treatment group received both baseline medicine and CPAP treatment. The full-night CPAP treatment was conducted from 21:00 pm to 6:00 am for 7 days preoperatively. The non-CPAP treatment group received baseline medicine treatment. LG and related parameters were collected at the first day of treatment in non-CPAP group and both first and last day of treatment in CPAP group.

Sleep parameters including apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), mean and lowest SPO2, and clinical evaluations including New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, arterial blood gas analysis findings, baseline medication, and 6-minute walk test were recorded.

Operation related parameters (duration of operation, duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and bleeding volume) were recorded. Postoperative adverse events such as duration of ICU stay, postoperative duration of mechanical ventilation, pacemaker use, complicated infection and reintubations were recorded.

A full-night polysomnography as well as LG and related parameters were re-examined before discharge from hospital. The changes of AHIs, mean and lowest SPO2, LG and related parameters between pre- and post-operative polysomnography parameters were calculated.

The correlation between changes of polysomnography and LG parameters pre- and post-CPAP in CPAP group were analyzed. The correlation between changes of polysomnography and LG parameters pre- and post-operative in both CPAP and non-CPAP group were analyzed. The differences of polysomnography and LG parameters, and post-operative adverse events between CPAP and non-CPAP treatment group were analyzed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210029
        • Recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients aged 18-75 years.
  2. Patients with heart valve disease.
  3. Patients combined with obstructive sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index >=5/h).
  4. Received cardiac valve replacement surgery.
  5. The enrolled patients having received patients' informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of stroke or clinical signs of peripheral or central nervous system disorders.
  2. History of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma.
  3. Enrolment in another clinical study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: continuous positive airway pressure
The CPAP treatment group received both baseline medicine and CPAP treatment for 7 days preoperatively.
The CPAP treatment group received both baseline medicine and CPAP treatment for 7 days preoperatively.
NO_INTERVENTION: non-continuous positive airway pressure
The non-CPAP treatment group received baseline medicine treatment without CPAP treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
changes of apnea-hypopnea index
Time Frame: 14 days
Changes of apnea-hypopnea index pre- and post-operative were compared between CPAP and non-CPAP patients.
14 days
changes of lowest SPO2
Time Frame: 14 days
Changes of lowest SPO2 pre- and post-operative were compared between CPAP and non-CPAP patients.
14 days
comparison of loop gain
Time Frame: 7 days

Loop gain pre- and post-operative was compared between CPAP and non-CPAP patients.

Loop gain pre- and post-CPAP treatment were compared in CPAP group.

7 days
arousal threshold
Time Frame: 14 days

Arousal threshold pre- and post-operative was compared between CPAP and non-CPAP patients.

Arousal threshold pre- and post-CPAP treatment were compared in CPAP group.

14 days
upper airway gain
Time Frame: 14 days

Upper airway gain pre- and post-operative was compared between CPAP and non-CPAP patients.

Upper airway gain pre- and post-CPAP treatment were compared in CPAP group.

14 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
duration of operation
Time Frame: 12 hours
Duration of operation was compared between CPAP and non-CPAP patients.
12 hours
duration of cardiopulmonary bypass
Time Frame: 12 hours
Duration of cardiopulmonary bypass was compared between CPAP and non-CPAP patients.
12 hours
duration of ICU stays
Time Frame: 14 days
Duration of ICU stays were compared between CPAP and non-CPAP patients.
14 days
duration of mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: 14 days
Postoperative duration of mechanical ventilation was compared between CPAP and non-CPAP patients.
14 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Hong Wang, Ph D, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 31, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 30, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 15, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 10, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Valve Diseases

Clinical Trials on continuous positive airway pressure

Subscribe