Mosaic Mitral Valve: Long-Term Outcomes in Patients Under 65 (MMV)

February 18, 2026 updated by: Michael Moront

Long Term Patient Outcomes and Product Durability of the Mosaic Mitral Valve Bioprosthesis in Patients Under 65

The safety and efficacy of the Mosaic bioprosthetic heart valves for cardiac valve replacement in the aortic position has been well documented throughout the literature. However, few studies assessing structural valve deficiency, patient outcomes and overall product performance in patients under the age of 65 exists for the Mosaic mitral valve bioprosthetic. This study aims to assess valve efficacy, stability, and post operative outcomes in patients who have received the Mosaic mitral valve prothesis at ProMedica Toledo Hospital and were under the age of 65.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background:

Within the U.S., the prevalence of valvular heart disease is estimated at 2.5% with an abrupt increase after the age of 65 years, predominantly due to degenerative etiologies. In patients with significant valve insufficiency or stenosis where repair or reconstruction is not feasible, valve replacement is the most offered solution. The two types of heart valves offered to patients include mechanical or bioprosthetic. The major advantage of bioprosthetic heart valves in comparison to mechanical valves is the lack of post-operative anticoagulant therapy. However, the major disadvantage of bioprosthetic heart valves lie in their reduced durability compared to mechanical valves, with reoperation rates of ~10% at 10 years and up to 30% at 15 years.

The use of porcine bioprosthetic heart valves for cardiac valve replacement first appeared in the late 1960s and have been widely used since due to the avoidance of anticoagulant therapy. One of the major drawbacks associated with bioprosthetic valves is structural valve deterioration (SVD) which can lead to reduced valve durability, necessitating reoperation. The causes of SVD are poorly understood, however, it is thought to result from the accumulation of calcium and lipids on the valve surface. The Medtronic Mosaic mitral bioprosthetic valve is a 3rd-generation, stented porcine heart valve that was originally approved for clinical use in the U.S. in 2000. These valves are treated with a 0.2% glutaraldehyde solution stabilizing the tissue by cross-linking free lysine residues. In addition, the valve is treated with alpha-amino oleic acid (AOATM) which has been shown to mitigate leaflet calcification in animal studies. Long term clinical safety and efficacy of the Mosaic valve in the aortic position is well documented throughout the literature however, few studies exist detailing performance in the mitral position. Moreover, even fewer studies exist detailing overall valve survival in patients under 65 due to the more common recommendation of the use of mechanical valve replacement in this population. The purpose of this study is to examine long-term outcomes in patients who have received the Mosaic mitral valve bioprosthetic and were under the age of 65 at placement.

Significance:

The investigation of the Medtronic mosaic heart valve in the mitral position will allow for a better assessment of product performance and its impact on patient outcomes. Results can inform physicians on the longevity of the product when used in the mitral position allowing for more accurate prediction of replacement time. In addition, the results may provide further information to the safety and efficacy of placement in the mitral position in patients under the age of 65, a population in which mechanical valves are more prevalent.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Study population will include patients who received the mosaic mitral valve bioprosthetic and were between 18-65 years of age at the time of surgery.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Received the Mosaic Mitral Valve Bioprosthetic at ProMedica Toledo Hospital
  • Under the age of 65

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Over the age of 65
  • Under the age of 18
  • Surgery performed at institutions outside of ProMedica Toledo Hospital

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Mitral Valve Replacement
Patients who have undergone mitral valve replacement at ProMedica Hospital using the mosaic bioprosthesis and were under the age of 65.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: From January 2001 to December 2025
Mortality in patients who were under the age of 65 when receiving the mosaic mitral valve bioprosthetic at ProMedica hospital. Patient records will be reviewed to determine mortality rate of patients who were under 65 years of age when receiving the mosaic mitral valve bioprosthetic.
From January 2001 to December 2025
Morbidity
Time Frame: January 2001 - December 2025
Post operative morbidity rate for a series of outcomes will be assessed in patients who received the Mosaic mitral valve bioprosthetic over time.
January 2001 - December 2025

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Valve Stability
Time Frame: From January 2001 to December 2025
Assess valve stability in patients who received a mosaic mitral valve bioprosthetic at ProMedica Toledo Hospital. Valve stability will be assessed by reviewing post operative echocardiographic data.
From January 2001 to December 2025
Freedom of Re-operation
Time Frame: January 2001 - December 2025
A survival analysis for freedom of reoperation will be assessed for patients who were under 65 at the time of mitral valve replacement.
January 2001 - December 2025

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Moront, MD, ProMedica Health System

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB# 24-129
  • ERP-2024-13849 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Medtronic, Inc)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Valve Disease, Heart

Subscribe