Feasibility and Acceptability of Digital Pills to Monitor PrEP Adherence in MSM With Substance Use (DigiPrEP)

December 20, 2022 updated by: Peter R Chai, Brigham and Women's Hospital
This study deploys a novel digital pill with Emtricitabine/Tenofovir (TDF/FTC) among MSM with substance use to monitor PrEP adherence. The investigators will enroll N=15 HIV uninfected MSM with self reported substance use who are on PrEP or initiating PrEP to use digital pills over encapsulating TDF/FTC for 3 months. The investigators will assess the feasibility of using digital pills in this study population as well as understand the acceptability of digital pills for adherence measurement using semi-structured individual interviews. Additionally, the investigators will measure adherence over time, as well as episodes of suboptimal PrEP adherence.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Eligible study participants will be screened and enrolled at Fenway Health (Boston, MA). Participants will complete a quantitative assessment on their history fo substance use, sexual risk and PrEP adherence, and be trained to use the digital pill for 90 days and instructed to take PrEP daily during the course of the study. Participants will return each month for a study visit to assess their use of the technology. At study visit 1 and 3, we will obtain dried blood spots (DBS) to measure drug levels and to confirm adherence detected by the digital pill. The investigators will also obtain drugs of abuse screens from DBS. At the final study visit (3 months), participants will undergo a semi-structured qualitative interview to understand the user response to digital pills.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boylston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Fenway Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. MSM (cisgender male)
  2. Self-reported use of non-alcohol substances of abuse in past 6 months
  3. Currently taking PrEP
  4. Has qualifying laboratory tests (Cr, hepatitis B immunization, STI testing and syphilis)
  5. Age 18 or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Does not speak English
  2. HIV positive
  3. Identifies as transgender
  4. Estimated creatinine clearance <60ml/min
  5. Active hepatitis B treatment
  6. Does not own a smartphone
  7. Taking proton pump inhibitors
  8. History of Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis
  9. History of bowel surgery, gastric bypass, bowel stricture
  10. History of GI malignancy or radiation to abdomen
  11. Unable/unwilling to ingest digital pill

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Digital Pills
Digital Pills containing Truvada ingested once daily as PrEP
Digital pills over encapsulating Truvada
Other Names:
  • eTectRx ID Cap
Truvada prescribed with digital pills for PrEP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of Digital Pills to Measure PrEP Adherence
Time Frame: Months 1, 2, and 3
Participants' engagement with the digital pill system (DPS) was measured over the 90-day study period. The percentages for the total expected ingestions recorded by DPS each month were compared.
Months 1, 2, and 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Digital Pill Performance - Number of Recorded Ingestions
Time Frame: Months 1, 2, and 3
The total number recorded ingestions recorded by the digital pill system (DPS) - which included both the number of Reader-detected and manually-reported ingestions - was collected. The Reader-detected ingestions count was used to reflect the number of times the DPS was operated correctly. Successful DPS operation was defined as ingestion of a digital pill, proper use of the wearable Reader, and confirmation of the ingestion on both the Reader and the app. Cumulative data collected at months 1, 2, and 3 are reported in the data table below.
Months 1, 2, and 3
Digital Pill Performance - System Accuracy
Time Frame: Months 1, 2, and 3
Accuracy of the digital pill system (DPS) in measuring PrEP adherence. To analyze the performance of the DPS, the ground truth of PrEP ingestion events was defined as the pill counts obtained each month (i.e., the number of unused pills returned, subtracted from the number of pills previously dispensed). The number of DPS-recorded ingestions - which included the number of both Reader-detected and manually-reported ingestions - was compared with the aggregate pill count at each monthly timepoint; this was defined as the overall performance metric for the DPS. Cumulative data collected at months 1, 2, and 3 are reported in the data table below.
Months 1, 2, and 3
Digital Pill Performance - Manually Reported Ingestions
Time Frame: Months 1, 2, and 3
The total number of manually reported ingestions was collected. The percentages for instances of manually reported ingestions were calculated. The two instances for manually recording ingestions included, a lack of engagement with the Reader or failure to use the Reader properly, and when reported ingestion was not detected by the Reader despite supporting use metrics indicating proper Reader use. Cumulative data collected at months 1, 2, and 3 are reported in the data table below.
Months 1, 2, and 3
Digital Pill Performance - Successful Operation of System
Time Frame: Months 1, 2, and 3
The total number of instances in which ingestions were successfully detected by the Reader (i.e., the radio frequency emitter was activated, and the ingestion was recorded by the DPS) was collected. The total number of instances in which manually reported ingestions were not detected by the Reader, despite supporting use metrics (e.g., accelerometer data) indicating proper Reader use was also collected. These counts were combined and interpreted as the number of times that the DPS was operated correctly. Cumulative data collected at months 1, 2, and 3 are reported in the data table below.
Months 1, 2, and 3
Dried Blood Spot Correlation With Digital Pill Adherence
Time Frame: Months 1 and 3
We dichotomized TFV-DP levels using a cutoff of ≥700 fmol/punch to indicate at least four doses of PrEP ingested per week. Using TFV-DP in DBS <700 vs ≥700 fmol/punch as a dichotomous variable, and considering the granular continuous adherence data from the digital pill, we then calculated a point biserial correlation between TFV-DP in DBS and digital pill adherence. Additionally, drug concentrations of tenofovir diphosphate as measured in dried blood spot collection at months one and three were compared to DPS-recorded PrEP adherence.
Months 1 and 3

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants That Completed Qualitative Interview to Evaluate Acceptability of Digital Pills
Time Frame: Month 3
Acceptability was assessed via individual, semi-structured, qualitative exit interviews conducted at the end of the 90-day study period. The qualitative interview guide was grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model. Questions explored participants' experiences using the digital pill system (DPS), including facilitators and barriers to use, engagement with the technology, and willingness to use the DPS long-term.
Month 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 22, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

April 22, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 22, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV/AIDS

Clinical Trials on Digital pill

Subscribe