- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03846050
Alcohol Impaired Driving: From the Laboratory to the Natural Environment
Risk for Alcohol Impaired Driving: From the Laboratory to the Natural Environment
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Building on laboratory findings from the the PI's (McCarthy) previous work, this project is designed to test AID decision making in both the lab and the natural drinking environment in which AID decisions are made.
Participants complete a laboratory alcohol administration session followed by six weeks of multi-method ambulatory assessment. The ambulatory assessment component will include participant report via smartphone, portable breathalizer (BACtrack), and location and movement data passively collected by the smartphone GPS/accelerometer. The combination of these methods will allow for the integration of subjective (e.g., perceived intoxication) and objective (e.g., BrAC, calculated drinking location) data for each drinking episode.
Aim 1 of the project is to test laboratory measures as prospective predictors of AID and examine the role of event-level influences on specific AID decisions.
Aim 2 of the proposed project is to test the potential for a novel intervention to reduce AID using mobile technology. Participants will be randomly assigned to either a full ambulatory assessment or a minimal assessment control condition. The timing of the introduction of AA will also be manipulated within the full ambulatory assessment condition. This design will allow us to test whether the introduction of ambulatory assessment produces changes in AID behavior, as well as whether such changes persist once ambulatory assessment is discontinued. Changes made to the revised application are aimed at ensuring the achievement of both study aims. If Aim 2 is achieved and ambulatory assessment alters AID behavior, the combination of the minimal assessment control condition and the full assessment condition prior to the introduction of ambulatory assessment has sufficient sample size and power to test Aim 1 hypotheses.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Missouri
-
Columbia, Missouri, United States, 65211
- University of Missouri-Columbia
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- moderate to heavy drinkers must drive regularly report recent binge drinking fluent in english
Exclusion Criteria:
- not in treatment for substance use disorder or other psychiatric disorders BMI under 30 no medical conditions contraindicating alcohol consumption
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: BAC Feedback, immediate onset
Participants will receive a"BAC Feedback/Warning" intervention based on their assessed BAC. Participants in this arm will have a warning presented on their smartphone when they provide a breath sample that indicated their BAC has reached a set limit. The cutpoint for this warning is not disclosed but is well below the legal limit for driving. Warning will notify them that their results indicate it is not safe for them to drive. In this condition, participants will start their 6 week AA portion of their participation immediately after their laboratory session, and will be followed for 6 weeks afterwards. Comparisons between the two experimental conditions will allow for inferences about the onset and offset of any effects of the "BAC Feedback/Warning" intervention. |
Participants will receive a warning when their BAC reaches a set limit.
The cutpoint for this warning is not disclosed but is well below the legal limit for driving.
Warning will notify them that their results indicate it is not safe for them to drive.
|
|
Experimental: BAC Feedback, delayed onset
Participants will receive the "BAC Feedback/Warning" intervention based on their assessed BAC during drinking events.The cutpoint for this warning is not disclosed but is well below the legal limit for driving. Warning will notify them that their results indicate it is not safe for them to drive. In this condition, participants will be followed for 6 weeks after their laboratory session prior to starting their 6 week AA portion of their participation. Comparisons between the two experimental conditions will allow for inferences about the onset and offset of any effects of the "BAC Feedback/Warning" intervention. |
Participants will receive a warning when their BAC reaches a set limit.
The cutpoint for this warning is not disclosed but is well below the legal limit for driving.
Warning will notify them that their results indicate it is not safe for them to drive.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Minimal Assessment Control
Participants will receive the "No BAC Feedback/Warning" intervention. Participants in this condition will complete the laboratory and interview portions of the project. However the AA portion of the project will not contain warning about their BAC (No BAC Feedback/Warning) and will ask fewer questions regarding their AID decisions. The role of this condition is to provide a baseline comparison of AID behavior for the two active assessment conditions. |
Participants will receive no information on their current intoxication and will be asked to report less information on their driving decisions.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Alcohol impaired driving behavior
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Participants will provide self-reported driving behavior (yes/no driven a vehicle) after drinking alcohol during the AA portion.
This assessment will be taken from their daily smartphone responses.
|
12 weeks
|
|
Alcohol impaired driving behavior (retrospective)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Participants will provide self-reported driving behavior (yes/no driven a vehicle) after drinking alcohol retrospectively during interview sessions.
Participants will complete regular phone interview where their daily driving and drinking behavior will be assessed.
The outcome measure of interest will be days when participants report driving (yes/no) after consuming alcohol.
|
12 weeks
|
|
Alcohol impaired driving intentions
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Participants will provide self-reported intentions to drive after drinking alcohol (Would you drive now?
Yes/no) from daily assessments during the AA portion of the project.
|
6 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Perceived risk of driving
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Participants will report their perceived risk of driving (1 to 4 scale, "Not Dangerous to Very Dangerous") given their current level of impairment during AA portion of project.
|
6 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2008051
- R01AA019546 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Drinking and Driving
-
University of BernETH Zurich; University of St.GallenCompletedAlcohol Drinking | Impaired Driving | Transportation Accidents | Drunk DrivingSwitzerland
-
Behavior Therapy Associates, LLPCompletedHeavy Drinking | Driving Under the Influence | Alcohol Abstinence | Driving While IntoxicatedUnited States
-
Penn State UniversityNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA); National Institutes...CompletedUnderage Drinking | Driving Under the Influence | Drinking, TeenUnited States
-
Columbia UniversityNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)CompletedAlcohol Drinking | Driving DrunkUnited States
-
University of PennsylvaniaCompletedAlcohol Drinking | Alcohol Intoxication | Driving Under the Influence | Driving Impaired | Drive | Alcohol Impairment | Behavior, DrinkingUnited States
-
Penn State UniversityNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA); National Institutes...TerminatedUnderage Drinking | Driving Under the Influence | Drinking, Teen | Drinking, CollegeUnited States
-
Jordi Gol i Gurina FoundationSocietat Catalana de Medicina Familiar i Comunitària (CAMFIC); Associació Catalana... and other collaboratorsUnknownAlcohol Consumption | Traffic Accident | Risk Perception of Driving After Alcohol ConsumptionSpain
-
HBSARecruitingBinge Drinking, Underage Drinking, Drinking and Driving, Alcohol-Related HarmsUnited States
-
University of BernETH Zurich; University of St.GallenCompletedAlcohol Drinking | Impaired Driving | Drunk DrivingSwitzerland
-
University of PennsylvaniaCompletedAlcohol Drinking | Drinking Behavior | Perception, Self | Drinking, Alcohol | Alcohol Intoxication | Driving Under the InfluenceUnited States
Clinical Trials on BAC feedback/warning
-
University of Missouri-ColumbiaNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)Completed
-
University of EdinburghNHS LothianCompleted
-
Botanicure Co., Ltd.A2 Healthcare Taiwan CorporationWithdrawnVascular Dementia | Alzheimer's DiseaseTaiwan
-
Charsire Biotechnology Corp.CompletedAlzheimer's Disease or Vascular DementiaUnited States
-
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.University of California, Berkeley; National Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedSoft Drink Consumption | Sugar-sweetened Beverages | Information LabelsUnited States
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillRobert Wood Johnson FoundationCompleted
-
University of PennsylvaniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI); National Institutes of Health (NIH); Food and...CompletedCigarette Smoking BehaviorUnited States
-
University of EdinburghNHS LothianCompletedRespiratory InfectionsUnited Kingdom
-
Stanford UniversityCompletedScreen Time ExposureUnited States
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillStanford UniversityCompletedWeight StigmaUnited States