Surfactant Administration Via Thin Catheter Using a Specially Adapted Video Laryngoscope (VISUAL)

February 12, 2020 updated by: Gil Talmon, HaEmek Medical Center, Israel

Surfactant Administration Via Thin Catheter Using a Specially Adapted Video Laryngoscope - a Prospective Study Assessing the Feasibility of the VISUAL (Video Surfactant Administration Laryngoscopy) Method

In this study the investigators intend to assess the feasibility of surfactant administration via a thin catheter using a specially adapted video laryngoscope, with a groove designed to allow insertion of an endovascular catheter without the use of other instruments in the oral cavity (forceps ect.). The laryngoscope is of Peak Medic Ltd, Netania, Israel.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A prospective study to assess the safety and efficacy of surfactant administration via thin catheter using a specially adapted VNscope, originally used for endotracheal intubation and adapted for the administration of surfactant without the placement of an endotracheal tube.

Once neonates present respiratory distress, the adapted scope will be used - clinical and outcome measures will be collected to asses the safety and efficacy of the use

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Afula, Israel
        • Haemek medical centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 8 months (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. - Premature infants with gestational age 30-36 weeks.
  2. - Diagnosis of respiratory distress syndrome
  3. - Treatment with antenatal steroids.
  4. - Spontaneously breathing with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation.
  5. - maximal age 3 days.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. - Apgar score at 5 min < 5
  2. - Need for chest compressions or medication upon delivery.
  3. - Evident major congenital malformation, metabolic or genetic disorders.
  4. - Clinical evidence of sepsis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: preterm infants
A prospective study to assess the safety and efficacy of surfactant administration via thin catheter using a specially adapted VNscope, originally used for endotracheal intubation and adapted for the administration of surfactant without the placement of an endotracheal tube. A feasibility study of 10 preterm infants 30-36 gestational age at birth, that requires surfactant administration for the indication of respiratory distress syndrome, and do not require immediate intubation
surfactant administration via thin catheter using a specially adapted VNscope
Other Names:
  • VNScope VNS0-000; VNBlade VNB0-000/1
surfactant administration via thin catheter using a specially adapted VNscope
Other Names:
  • Curosurf - a porcine surfactant routinely used for RDS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of attempts until surfactant is administrated
Time Frame: maximal age 3 days.
Number of intubation attempts- higher values represent a worse outcome
maximal age 3 days.
Assessment of the infants' stability during the procedure - saturation, bradycardia, tachycardia.
Time Frame: maximal age 3 days.

Monitoring the baby during the procedure and assessment of the infants' stability:

hypoxia (Oxygen saturation less than 60% for more than 5 sec), bradycardia (HR less than 60 for more than 5 sec), tachycardia (HR more than 220 for more than 5 sec) bradycardia below 100 bpm and tachycardia above 220 bpm indicate worse outcome

maximal age 3 days.
Duration of the entire procedure, form laryngoscope insertion to surfactants administration and Laryngoscope blade out of the mouth.
Time Frame: maximal age 3 days.
Time measurement of the procedure, sorter time indicate a better outcome
maximal age 3 days.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Need of invasive mechanical ventilation in the next 24 hours.
Time Frame: maximal age 3 days.
Failure of non-invasive approach and conversion to invasive ventilation to evaluate the efficiency of the procedure
maximal age 3 days.
complications reports - one lung surfactant administration, pneumothorax, NEC, IVH, Pulmonary Hemorrhage
Time Frame: maximal age 3 days.
Documentation of the complication related to the procedure according to the clinical signs and chest x-ray after the procedure
maximal age 3 days.
Subjective procedure scale of assessment.
Time Frame: maximal age 3 days.
Physician subjective assessment to evaluate the feasibility of the procedure- IRB- approved survey aims to assess user experiences with Video Surfactant Administration Laryngoscopy method in NICU. The survey contains five levels- a) Very satisfied b) Somewhat satisfied c) Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied d) Somewhat dissatisfied e) Very dissatisfied
maximal age 3 days.
Unexpected pitfalls reports
Time Frame: maximal age 3 days.
Physician assessment to evaluate eny pitfalls during the procedure
maximal age 3 days.
Safety assessment of the procedure (Physician questionnaire)
Time Frame: maximal age 3 days.

Physician questionnaire- Do you feel VISUAL method is safe for the premature baby?

a)Yes b)Maybe c)No

maximal age 3 days.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gil talmon, dr, HaEmek Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 8, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 20, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Clinical Trials on using specially adapted VNscope

  • Barcelona Institute for Global Health
    Universidad de Granada; Consorci d'Atenció Primària de Salut de l'Eixample; Hospital... and other collaborators
    Recruiting
    Hepatitis B | Hepatitis C | Tuberculosis | Hiv | Chagas Disease | Schistosomiasis | Strongyloidiasis | Female Genital Mutilation Type I Status | Female Genital Mutilation Type II Status | Female Genital Mutilation Type III Status
    Spain
3
Subscribe