Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation for Lower Limbs

January 20, 2017 updated by: NeuroEnabling Technologies, Inc.

A Theranostic Tool to Assess and Enable Spared Spinal Motor Function After SCI

This study is to determine if non-invasive electrical stimulation of the spinal cord can be used to: 1) assess spared function following a spinal cord injury; and 2) be use for rehabilitation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study is to determine if non-invasive electrical stimulation of the spinal cord can be used to: 1) assess spared function following a spinal cord injury; and 2) be use for rehabilitation.

The investigators hypothesize that this type of stimulation can be used to locate and determine if any spinal (nerve) pathways or connections were spared following a spinal cord injury. We also hypothesize the same stimulation can help revive or recover function to muscles connected to these spared spinal (nerve) pathways in individuals who are clinically paralyzed. Our research has demonstrated that modifying the activation state of the spinal cord after an injury, or awakening the spinal cord, can benefit people with paralysis years after a spinal cord injury. This method and device have not yet been approved by the FDA for the treatment of paralysis and are under investigation. This study if successful will help provide further evidence that could be use to one day to gain FDA approval.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • University of California Los Angeles

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria: SCI ASIA A, B, C

  • Spinal cord injury 1 or more years prior
  • Non progressive cervical or thoracic SCI
  • Half of key muscles below neurological level having a motor score of less than 2/5
  • Ability to commit to home exercises and 16 week participation
  • Stable medical condition without cardiopulmonary disease or dysautonomia that would contraindicate participation in lower extremity rehabilitation or testing activities
  • Not dependent on ventilation support
  • No painful musculoskeletal dysfunction, unhealed fracture, pressure sore, or urinary tract infection that might interfere with lower extremity rehabilitation or testing activities
  • No clinically significant depression or ongoing drug abuse
  • Adequate social support network to be able to participate in weekly training and assessment sessions for the duration of the 16 week study period
  • No current anti-spasticity regimen
  • Must not have received botox injections in the prior six months
  • Be unable to use lower extremity for functional tasks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • No functional segmental reflexes below the lesion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Grp#1: sham stimulation

Group #1: Baseline clinical assessment; followed by two weeks training with no stimulation; then four weeks training + sham Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation; followed by repeat clinical assessment; then four weeks training + effective non-sham Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation; repeat clinical assessment.

Secondary outcome measurements: assess ability to stand with and without stimulation using a stance frame support; assess trunk function (core stability) with and without stimulation

A prototype device that non-invasively delivers electrical stimulation to the spinal cord will be used to assess and rehabilitate spared spinal cord function.
Other Names:
  • Prototype Device
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Grp#2: Control

Group #2: Baseline clinical assessment; followed by two weeks training with no Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation; then four weeks training + effective Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation; followed by repeat clinical assessment.

Secondary outcome measurements: assess ability to stand with and without stimulation using a stance frame support; assess trunk function (core stability) with and without stimulation

A prototype device that non-invasively delivers electrical stimulation to the spinal cord will be used to assess and rehabilitate spared spinal cord function.
Other Names:
  • Prototype Device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in sensorimotor function in the lower extremities
Time Frame: 10-12 weeks

Subjects will be tested by several measures of sensory and motor function, as well as self assessments of spasticity, quality of life, and independence. These tests include:

American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scoring system, Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM), Ashworth Spasticity Scale, Penn Spasm Frequency, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Spasticity, Electromyographic (EMG) recordings, Joint angle (goniometer) measures, kinematic analysis.

10-12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ability to stand independently
Time Frame: 2-4 weeks
Subjects will be evaluated on their core body function and ability to stand
2-4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Victor R Edgerton, PhD, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Principal Investigator: Nicholas A Terrafranca, DPM, NeuroEnabling Technologies, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 19, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 24, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 24, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injury

Clinical Trials on Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation

Subscribe