Reliability of Simple Sonographic Findings Acquired With Hand-held Apparatuses to Inform Obstetric Diagnosis

July 23, 2019 updated by: Yuichi Kodaira, Doctors with Africa - CUAMM

Reliability of Simple Sonographic Findings Acquired With Hand-held Apparatuses to Inform Obstetric Diagnosis in an Urban Low Resource Setting

the study aims to assess the reliability of ultrasound findings measured by hand held ultrasound probes used by operators with variable experience in a low resource hospital.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale: The majority of obstetric emergencies are identified through clinical examination, which cannot be substituted by ultrasound. However, just as a laboratory exam, ultrasonograpy can provide swift point of care information on fetus presentation, viability, placenta position, quantity of amniotic fluid and presence of abdominal fluid to inform the clinical reasoning and therapeutic escalation. Ultrasound literature in low-resource settings has favoured antenatal care (ANC) rather than the emergency setting. Also, hand-held ultrasound machines may not be as performant as traditional machines used by expert operators but to date is still to be tested in a low resource setting.

Objective: to assess the reliability of ultrasound findings measured by hand held ultrasound probes used by operators with variable experience in a low resource hospital.

Hypothesis: There is substantial agreement between simple ultrasound findings identified using hand held ultrasound devices and the reference standard.

Study design: a prospective observational diagnostic accuracy study. Study population: parturients admitted to the Princess Christian Maternity Hospital (PCMH) in Freetown, Sierra Leone.

Sample size: no formal sample size calculation is performed. Based on current rates of admissions to the PCMH we expect to perform obstetrical ultrasound scan in at least 300 patients during a 2-months study period.

Methods: 4 trained physicians (3 naive and 1 intermediate ultrasound users) will perform the ultrasound investigations using the hand held device and complete a structured predefined report form of obstetric ultrasound findings at patient admission or according to clinical indications after admission. These will be compared with the reference standard, i.e. an ultrasound examination performed by a specialist gynecologist/obstetrician using a conventional apparatus in the hospital ultrasound room.

Main study parameters/primary endpoints: The mean diagnostic accuracy among nine ultrasound obstetric findings collected with hand held devices versus the reference standard.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Freetown, Sierra Leone
        • Princess Christian Maternal Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

  • Vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy:Vaginal bleeding or cramping, with amenorrhea or positive pregnancy test <22 weeks of gestation
  • Pre-eclampsia:Blood pressure ≥140/90 (at least 2 recordings, 4 hours apart) PLUS any of: proteinuria (at least 2+ on dipstick, headache, generalized oedema, visual disturbance).
  • APH third trimester: Vaginal bleeding after 22 weeks of pregnancy or in labour before giving birth. May have final diagnosis of abruptio placentae, placenta previa and ruptured uterus.
  • Prolonged/Obstructed labour: Prolonged latent or active phase, cephalopelvic disproportion, obstructed labor, inadequate uterine activity, prolonged expulsive phase.
  • High risk pregnancy in ANC defined by hospital protocol

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Admitted to the emergency department, outpatient department, in-patient department or antenatal care (ANC) of the PCMH during the study period.
  • Fulfills one or more of the five inclusion categories: i.e. vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy, pre-eclampsia, prolonged/obstructed labor, antepartum hemorrhage (APH) and other high risk pregnancies encountered in ANC.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ultrasound examination not feasible, e.g., due to electricity breakdown, or physical absence or unavailability of the trained sonographers.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
composite reliability of simple obstetric ultrasound findings collected by hand held ultrasound devices in a busy urban low resource setting.
Time Frame: From admission to 48 hours later
the mean aggregated diagnostic accuracy between the ultrasound findings collected via hand held devices as compared to the conventional apparatus.
From admission to 48 hours later

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
reliability for each pre-defined ultrasound finding
Time Frame: From admission to 48 hours later
Detailed diagnostic accuracy for each of the nine ultrasound findings.
From admission to 48 hours later
variance of the reliability between naïve and intermediate operators.
Time Frame: From admission to 48 hours later
Inter-observer agreement on ultrasound findings between naïve and intermediate operators.
From admission to 48 hours later
quality of images acquired with the hand held apparatus.
Time Frame: From admission to 48 hours later
Mean 'quality of image score' (0-4) for each of the nine ultrasound findings.
From admission to 48 hours later

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obstetric Complication

Clinical Trials on point of care ultrasound

3
Subscribe