Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery (ERAS)

September 25, 2019 updated by: Dr Jim Coates, James Cook University Hospital

Feasibility of Delivering Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery

Enhanced Recovery Protocols (ERPs or bundles) have been established in many surgical specialties (such as colon cancer and orthopaedic joint surgeries) for several years in hospitals worldwide. The principles of Enhanced Recovery Protocols are those of early mobilization and restoration of normal function as soon as possible after surgery. These principles are achieved by use of alternate pain control regimens and removing invasive lines and drains as soon as possible. The benefits of ERPs are improved patient experience, earlier return to normal function and reduced length of stay. Enhanced recovery protocols for cardiac surgery have been published by the Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery Society.

The current study will investigate whether it is possible to utilise ERP bundles in the population of cardiac surgery patients at James Cook Hospital, with a view to rolling out a full ERP service. Secondary study outcomes will be patient-centred, including; pain scores, nausea and vomiting rates and time taken to return to normal function.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Why? Enhanced Recovery Protocols (ERPs or bundles) have been established in many surgical specialties (such as colon cancer and orthopaedic joint surgeries) for several years in hospitals worldwide. The principles of Enhanced Recovery Protocols are those of early mobilization and restoration of normal function as soon as possible after surgery. These principles are achieved by use of alternate pain control regimens and removing invasive lines and drains as soon as possible. The benefits of ERPs are improved patient experience, earlier return to normal function and reduced length of stay. Enhanced recovery protocols for cardiac surgery have been published by the Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery Society. These protocols have been demonstrated as safe, though have yet to make it into mainstream practice in the UK. The use of ERPs in Cardiac Surgery has the potential to greatly improve the patient journey and hospital efficiency.

What? The current study will investigate whether it is possible to utilise ERP bundles in the population of cardiac surgery patients at James Cook Hospital, with a view to rolling out a full ERP service. Secondary study outcomes will be patient-centred, including; pain scores, nausea and vomiting rates and time taken to return to normal function.

Who? All adult patients over the age of 18 years and listed for cardiac surgery will be considered for inclusion in this study.

Where? The study population will be comprised of patients undergoing cardiac surgery at the James Cook University Hospital in Middlesbrough.

How? Study duration will be 6 months, with 80 patients (comprising a control and intervention group)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Teeside
      • Middlesbrough, Teeside, United Kingdom, TS4 3BW
        • Recruiting
        • James Cook University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jim C Coates, MBBS
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Adrian Mellor, MBBS
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Sarah Round, MBBS
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jonathan Brand, MBBS
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Enoch Akuowah, MBBS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Having Cardiac Surgery
  • Aged 18 years or older at the time of consent
  • Deemed appropriate for ERAS by Surgeon and Anaesthetist
  • Able and willing to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 years or under
  • Deemed not suitable for ERAS by Surgeon and/or Anaesthetist

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: ERAS Control/non-ERAS group
Standard usual care after cardiac surgery.
Experimental: ERAS group

Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery. Pre-op carbohydrate drink, Lansoprazole and Gabapentin.

Intra-operative: IV Paracetamol, Dexamethasone, Ondansetron, Local Anaesthetic to wounds.

Post-op: Gabapentin PO, Paracetamol IV then PO, Ondansetron IV for 24hrs. Opiate sparing. Early extubation, early mobilisation, early removal of invasive devices. Early discharge.

Pre-operative Carbohydrate PreLoad drink, 1 sachet given the night before surgery. One sachet given 2-4hours before surgery.
One dose of Gabapentin pre-operatively, 300mg orally.
One dose of Lansoprazole pre-operatively, 30mg orally.
One dose of Paracetamol intra-operatively, 1gram intravenous infusion.
One dose of Dexamethasone intra-operatively as an anti-emetic, 8mg intravenous.
One dose of Ondansetron intra-operatively as an anti-emetic, 4mg intravenous
Infiltration of surgical wounds with local anaesthetic at the end of surgery, Bupivacaine 1-2mg/kg.
One infusion of intravenous Magnesium Sulphate intra-operatively as an analgesic, 50mg/kg given over 30minutes.
Post-operative oral Gabapentin 300mg, three times daily as an analgesic.
Post-operative Paracetamol as an analgesic. Initially intravenously, then orally. One gram four times daily.
Intravenous Ondansetron administered post-operatively as prophylactic anti-emesis. 4mg three times daily, for 24 hours. Then as required.
Removal of the endotracheal tube in the Intensive Care Unit as soon as is safe.
Mobilisation (active and passive limb movements, deep breathing) with the assistance of nurse/physiotherapist to occur as soon as possible post-operatively.
Patients will be encouraged to start eating as soon as possible post-operatively

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ERAS bundle compliance in the first 48hours post-op
Time Frame: 48hours post op
Number of interventions for the ERAS protocol that are delivered to patient (numeric data e.g. 6 out of 10)
48hours post op

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to extubation
Time Frame: 0-24hours
Time taken until patient extubated (ETT) post op (in minutes)
0-24hours
Time to mobilisation
Time Frame: 0-48hours
First mobilisation with nurse/physiotherapist post-op (in minutes)
0-48hours
Time to oral diet
Time Frame: 0-48hours
Time until patient first eats post-op (in minutes)
0-48hours
Post-op pain
Time Frame: 6hours
Pain scores at 6hours, Numeric scale 0 (no pain) - 10 (severe pain)
6hours
Post-op pain
Time Frame: 12hours
Pain scores at 12hours, Numeric scale 0 (no pain) - 10 (severe pain)
12hours
Post-op pain
Time Frame: 24hours
Pain scores at 24hours, Numeric scale 0 (no pain) - 10 (severe pain)
24hours
Quality of Recovery
Time Frame: 6 weeks post surgery
Quantification of patient quality of recovery. Using Q-o-R 15 Scale internationally validated scale. This allows the patient to report on a numerical scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (all of the time); the patients scores on aspects of recovery such as pain at rest, pain on movement, quality of sleep, presence of nausea and vomiting, feeling supported by medical staff.
6 weeks post surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jim C Coates, MBBS, James Cook University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 17, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 29, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 28, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 27, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Pre-operative Carbohydrate PreLoad drink

Subscribe