Offloading Device for Post Surgical Foot Procedures

January 30, 2024 updated by: Jeffrey A. Gusenoff, MD

A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing PopSole™ Offloading Device to Standard of Care Methods for the Reduction of Pain and Expedited Recovery in Patients Post Fat Graft Procedure

Study goals are to determine if a novel post-surgical foot offloading device can reduce post-operative pain and expedite the return to daily activity following fat grafting. Investigators will perform a prospective, randomized study utilizing PopSole™, a novel fully customizable post-operative shoe insert, to aid in the recovery of patients post-surgical fat graft injections for pain and limited activity due to foot disorders (ie. fat pad atrophy of the forefoot, heel, or for chronic plantar fasciitis).

Standard of care fat grafting is often used in plastic surgery for cosmetic or reconstructive reasons. Foot fat grafting, though not considered part of this research trial, is routinely offered in the UPMC Aesthetic Plastic Surgery center as a cosmetic surgery option; however, treatment modality options following the completion of a foot fat grafting procedure to protect the fat grafts and reduce weight bearing on the fresh fat grafts are limited. Current standard of care options including crutches, scooters, bulky post-operative shoes (ie. Darco shoes [Darco Intl. Huntington WV.]), and the addition of padding to insoles or orthotics that attempt to offload the treated area. Most of these devices are flat and provide poor anatomical support, leading to compensatory gait issues which can lead to further problems and pain in the knees, hips, and back. The most common complication with post-operative foot gear is non-compliance: patients do not wear it.

The investigators have devised a novel foot offloading device (PopSole™) which will allow for customization of the area where the fat has been injected into the foot, as well as allow for customizable arch support and elevation of the metatarsals. By randomizing patients to recovery with standard methods versus this new device, the investigators are hopeful for earlier patient ambulation and return to work with decreased pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Subjects will complete the following screening research procedures:

  1. Baseline reported outcome measures (PROMs) questionnaires and surveys that will take approximately 25 minutes to complete:

    • Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) questionnaire to assess subject ADL and function ability
    • Mayo Clinical Scoring System questionnaire (MAYO) to assess subject pain, activity and function
    • American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society questionnaire (AOFAS) to assess subject pain and function
    • Manchester Foot and Ankle Disability Index to assess subject foot pain/discomfort
    • Pittsburgh Foot Survey to assess subject pain, activity, life satisfaction/quality of life
    • Offload Device Survey to assess the ease and comfort of the offload device
  2. Foot ultrasounds will be performed to assess and measure baseline thickness of the plantar fascia, forefoot, or heel.
  3. 2D Photographs of both feet will be performed for a visual baseline assessment skin and soft tissue thickness.

If the clinical fat graft procedure occurs on a day different from the screening visit, the following research activities will be completed at Visit 2 if the subject continues to remain interested and eligible for study participation:

  1. Collection of subject's vital signs (Temp, HR, Resp., BP), medication profile, allergies, weight, BMI calculation and adverse event collection and reporting.
  2. Medical and surgical history collection review - the Investigator will confirm that the subject's medical status has not changed since last seen and the subject continues to satisfy eligibility criteria for study intervention.
  3. Performance of a limited physical and foot exam by PI and /or Co-investigator MD
  4. Women of childbearing potential will receive a urine pregnancy dip test with results documented to study chart.
  5. Diary cards with instruction to start entry on the diary card 24 hours after the fat grafting surgery to continue through Post-operative Visit 4 (Month 1) and be placed to study chart. The subject will be instructed to document self-assessment of the following events pertaining to the surgical site: Pain, Bruising, Redness of the skin, Itching, Swelling, Bleeding, Other (any concerns/issues not listed). The subject will be instructed to identify on the diary card the location, date and day of each documented event. Unresolved events at Visit 4 will be carried over for documentation to the adverse event log.
  6. 2D Photographs of both feet
  7. Offload Device Distribution to remain in use at all times during ambulation and activity instruction to stay off of feet as much as possible for 3 days, then limit ambulation to 10 minutes per hour for 4 weeks and no sports, kicking, running or exercise for 4 weeks. Devices will be provided for both feet to maintain symmetry and gait stability between the two feet.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Matthew T Bottegal, BA
  • Phone Number: 4126412007
  • Email: mab62@pitt.edu

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • UPMC Magee Women's Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Matthew T Bottegal, BA
          • Phone Number: 4126412007
          • Email: mab62@pitt.edu
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jeffrey A Gusenoff, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Matthew T Bottegal, BA
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Autumn Groscost, PA
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Beth Gusenoff, DPM
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • MaCalus Hogan, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Kentaro Onishi, DO
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Patsy Simon, RN

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged 18 years or older and able to provide informed consent
  2. Subjects scheduled to undergo a standard of care treatment with fat grafting for foot pain due to forefoot or heel fat pad atrophy or chronic plantar fasciitis as defined by heel pain for greater than 6 months and failed non-surgical therapy
  3. Willing and able to comply with follow up examinations, including ultrasounds

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Concurrent injury to the lower extremity that would effect gait
  2. Open foot ulcerations, fractures, or diagnosis of osteomyelitis of the feet
  3. Surgical foot intervention in the last 6 months
  4. Diagnosis of pregnancy or the intent of the participant to become pregnant during participation in this study
  5. Any issue that per the physician's determination would render the patient not appropriate to continue participation in the study (compliance, change in physical status, etc.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Pedal fat grafting followed by PopSole™ offloading device
Offload Device Distribution to remain in use at all times during ambulation and activity instruction to stay off of feet as much as possible for 3 days, then limit ambulation to 10 minutes per hour for 4 weeks and no sports, kicking, running or exercise for 4 weeks. Devices will be provided for both feet to maintain symmetry and gait stability between the two feet.
Other: Standard of care
Pedal fat grafting followed by standard post-operative care with padding of the insoles
the control arm will be provided with standard padded insole to wear inside footwear

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ultrasonography
Time Frame: at screening
Tissue thickness (skin, soft tissue, and plantar fascia thickness) as assessed by ultrasound
at screening
Ultrasonography
Time Frame: 1 month post-op
Tissue thickness (skin, soft tissue, and plantar fascia thickness) as assessed by ultrasound
1 month post-op
Ultrasonography
Time Frame: 2 months post-op
Tissue thickness (skin, soft tissue, and plantar fascia thickness) as assessed by ultrasound
2 months post-op
Ultrasonography
Time Frame: 6 months post-op
Tissue thickness (skin, soft tissue, and plantar fascia thickness) as assessed by ultrasound
6 months post-op
American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society questionnaire (AOFAS).
Time Frame: at screening
This survey assesses gait (no abnormality to severe abnormality), ankle motion restriction (no restriction to severe restriction), difficulty with waling on uneven surfaces (no difficulty to severe difficulty) and alignment (good to poor). There is no overall summation of results
at screening
American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society questionnaire (AOFAS).
Time Frame: 1 month post-op
This survey assesses gait (no abnormality to severe abnormality), ankle motion restriction (no restriction to severe restriction), difficulty with waling on uneven surfaces (no difficulty to severe difficulty) and alignment (good to poor). There is no overall summation of results
1 month post-op
American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society questionnaire (AOFAS).
Time Frame: 2 months post-op
This survey assesses gait (no abnormality to severe abnormality), ankle motion restriction (no restriction to severe restriction), difficulty with waling on uneven surfaces (no difficulty to severe difficulty) and alignment (good to poor). There is no overall summation of results
2 months post-op
American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society questionnaire (AOFAS).
Time Frame: 6 months post-op
This survey assesses gait (no abnormality to severe abnormality), ankle motion restriction (no restriction to severe restriction), difficulty with waling on uneven surfaces (no difficulty to severe difficulty) and alignment (good to poor). There is no overall summation of results
6 months post-op
Pittsburgh Foot Survey
Time Frame: at screening
Pain and function questionnaire measure. Scale for pain ranges from "Very severe" to "Had no pain". Scale for pain interference ranges from " Very much" to "not at all". Scale of functionality ranges from "unable to do" to "without any difficulty" in regards to a range of specified activities. There is no overall summation of results
at screening
Pittsburgh Foot Survey
Time Frame: 1 month post-op
Pain and function questionnaire measure. Scale for pain ranges from "Very severe" to "Had no pain". Scale for pain interference ranges from " Very much" to "not at all". Scale of functionality ranges from "unable to do" to "without any difficulty" in regards to a range of specified activities. There is no overall summation of results
1 month post-op
Pittsburgh Foot Survey
Time Frame: 2 months post-op
Pain and function questionnaire measure. Scale for pain ranges from "Very severe" to "Had no pain". Scale for pain interference ranges from " Very much" to "not at all". Scale of functionality ranges from "unable to do" to "without any difficulty" in regards to a range of specified activities. There is no overall summation of results
2 months post-op
Pittsburgh Foot Survey
Time Frame: 6 months post-op
Pain and function questionnaire measure. Scale for pain ranges from "Very severe" to "Had no pain". Scale for pain interference ranges from " Very much" to "not at all". Scale of functionality ranges from "unable to do" to "without any difficulty" in regards to a range of specified activities. There is no overall summation of results
6 months post-op
Manchester Foot and Ankle Disability Index
Time Frame: at screening
Pain and function questionnaire assessment. Three responses to a variety of pain and specified activities raging from "On most/every day(s)" which is scored as 2 to "none of the time" which is scored as 0. Summation is made on Functional (0-20 with 20 being the lowest functioning), Personal appearance (0-4 with 4 being the worst), pain (0-10 with 10 being the worst), work/leisure (0-100 with 100 being the worst impact on work/leisure).
at screening
Manchester Foot and Ankle Disability Index
Time Frame: 1 month post-op
Pain and function questionnaire assessment. Three responses to a variety of pain and specified activities raging from "On most/every day(s)" which is scored as 2 to "none of the time" which is scored as 0. Summation is made on Functional (0-20 with 20 being the lowest functioning), Personal appearance (0-4 with 4 being the worst), pain (0-10 with 10 being the worst), work/leisure (0-100 with 100 being the worst impact on work/leisure).
1 month post-op
Manchester Foot and Ankle Disability Index
Time Frame: 2 months post-op
Pain and function questionnaire assessment. Three responses to a variety of pain and specified activities raging from "On most/every day(s)" which is scored as 2 to "none of the time" which is scored as 0. Summation is made on Functional (0-20 with 20 being the lowest functioning), Personal appearance (0-4 with 4 being the worst), pain (0-10 with 10 being the worst), work/leisure (0-100 with 100 being the worst impact on work/leisure).
2 months post-op
Manchester Foot and Ankle Disability Index
Time Frame: 6 months post-op
Pain and function questionnaire assessment. Three responses to a variety of pain and specified activities raging from "On most/every day(s)" which is scored as 2 to "none of the time" which is scored as 0. Summation is made on Functional (0-20 with 20 being the lowest functioning), Personal appearance (0-4 with 4 being the worst), pain (0-10 with 10 being the worst), work/leisure (0-100 with 100 being the worst impact on work/leisure).
6 months post-op
Mayo Clinical Scoring System questionnaire (MAYO)
Time Frame: at screening
Pain and function questionnaire. Pain scale from 0 (worst) to 50 (no pain). Activity limitations, orthotic requirements, antalgic gait, neuropathy and plantar heel tenderness are all graded 10 (best) to 10 (worst). Overall summation is excellent (90-100), good (80-89), fair (70-79), poor (<70)
at screening
Mayo Clinical Scoring System questionnaire (MAYO)
Time Frame: 1 month post-op
Pain and function questionnaire. Pain scale from 0 (worst) to 50 (no pain). Activity limitations, orthotic requirements, antalgic gait, neuropathy and plantar heel tenderness are all graded 10 (best) to 10 (worst). Overall summation is excellent (90-100), good (80-89), fair (70-79), poor (<70)
1 month post-op
Mayo Clinical Scoring System questionnaire (MAYO)
Time Frame: 2 months post-op
Pain and function questionnaire. Pain scale from 0 (worst) to 50 (no pain). Activity limitations, orthotic requirements, antalgic gait, neuropathy and plantar heel tenderness are all graded 10 (best) to 10 (worst). Overall summation is excellent (90-100), good (80-89), fair (70-79), poor (<70)
2 months post-op
Mayo Clinical Scoring System questionnaire (MAYO)
Time Frame: 6 months post-op
Pain and function questionnaire. Pain scale from 0 (worst) to 50 (no pain). Activity limitations, orthotic requirements, antalgic gait, neuropathy and plantar heel tenderness are all graded 10 (best) to 10 (worst). Overall summation is excellent (90-100), good (80-89), fair (70-79), poor (<70)
6 months post-op
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) questionnaire
Time Frame: at screening
Mobility and functionality questionnaire. Scale ranges from "Unable to do" to "no difficulty at all" in response to questions on mobility. There is no overall summation of results.
at screening
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 month post-op
Mobility and functionality questionnaire. Scale ranges from "Unable to do" to "no difficulty at all" in response to questions on mobility. There is no overall summation of results.
1 month post-op
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) questionnaire
Time Frame: 2 months post-op
Mobility and functionality questionnaire. Scale ranges from "Unable to do" to "no difficulty at all" in response to questions on mobility. There is no overall summation of results.
2 months post-op
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months post-op
Mobility and functionality questionnaire. Scale ranges from "Unable to do" to "no difficulty at all" in response to questions on mobility. There is no overall summation of results.
6 months post-op

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Offload Device Survey
Time Frame: at screening
Device satisfaction measure questionnaire. Questions are answered yes/no in all cases except comfort (0-10 with 10 being the most comfortable), ease of use (0-10 with 10 being most easy to use) and how many hours per night a patient needed to wear a night splint (0-8).
at screening
Offload Device Survey
Time Frame: 2 weeks post-op
Device satisfaction measure questionnaire. Questions are answered yes/no in all cases except comfort (0-10 with 10 being the most comfortable), ease of use (0-10 with 10 being most easy to use) and how many hours per night a patient needed to wear a night splint (0-8).
2 weeks post-op
Offload Device Survey
Time Frame: 1 month post-op
Device satisfaction measure questionnaire. Questions are answered yes/no in all cases except comfort (0-10 with 10 being the most comfortable), ease of use (0-10 with 10 being most easy to use) and how many hours per night a patient needed to wear a night splint (0-8).
1 month post-op
Offload Device Survey
Time Frame: 2 months post-op
Device satisfaction measure questionnaire. Questions are answered yes/no in all cases except comfort (0-10 with 10 being the most comfortable), ease of use (0-10 with 10 being most easy to use) and how many hours per night a patient needed to wear a night splint (0-8).
2 months post-op

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jeffrey A Gusenoff, MD, University of Pittsburgh

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 8, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 31, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY19080348

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Plantar Fascitis

Clinical Trials on PopSole™ offloading device

3
Subscribe