A Study of Different Endoscopic Surgery Procedures in Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps

March 14, 2019 updated by: Beijing Tongren Hospital

Long-term Outcomes of Radical Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Plus Draf 3 Procedure in Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps and Asthma: A 9-year Prospective Study

CRS remains a common challenging clinical entity due to variable phenotypes with different underlying mechanisms that lead to persistence or recurrence polyps. The eosinophils dominant inflammation was considered as a major pathological hallmark and challenges of CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Differentiate surgical approaches towards eosinophilic CRSwNP (eCRSwNP) should be addressed on the basis of the inflammatory endotypes. eCRSwNP has been recognized as the most easily relapsed type of CRS, and the combination of asthma increases the difficulty of treatment. Till now there is no recognized surgical strategy for eCRSwNP with asthma.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

27

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years to 69 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The diagnosis of CRSwNP was based on the standard criteria issued in the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps guidelines.
  • Participants had at least 1 previous sinus surgery underwent FESS (middle turbinate (MT) preserved), good gasification of frontal sinus and with concomitant asthma.
  • The diagnosis of asthma was confirmed by a chest physician according to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines.
  • Polyp biopsy was undertaken 1 week before surgery and the eCRSwNP was confirmed by the number of eosinophils exceeded 10% of total infiltrating inflammatory cells in the polyp tissue through the evaluation by using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients were excluded if they had unilateral disease, allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, antrochoanal polyps, or cysts.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: radical endoscopic sinus surgery plus Draf 3 surgery
The procedure of RESS was completed as described in "full-house FESS (FHF)" approach, involving complete removal of all nasal polyps along with a full maxillary antrostomy, total ethmoidectomy, wide sphenoidotomy, and a Draf 2A frontal sinusotomy. Moreover the bilateral inferior two-thirds of MTs were meanwhile resected. The technique for the Draf 3 frontal drillout procedure was described in detail in previous publications with resection of the superior nasal septum, central frontal sinus floor, and frontal beak region, resulting in a widely patent, oval-shaped, common frontal sinus neo-ostium
Experimental: radical endoscopic sinus surgery
The procedure of RESS was completed as described in "full-house FESS (FHF)" approach, involving complete removal of all nasal polyps along with a full maxillary antrostomy, total ethmoidectomy, wide sphenoidotomy, and a Draf 2A frontal sinusotomy. Moreover the bilateral inferior two-thirds of MTs were meanwhile resected
Experimental: functional endoscopic sinus surgery
FESS was performed by Messerklinger technique with middle turbinate preservation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
recurrence
Time Frame: 1 year after surgery
Recurrence was defined if the patient had symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis after surgery, and nasal endoscopy found nasal polyps recurrence, obvious edema of mucosa, or purulent secretion, and above of symptoms or physical signs existed, which can't be alleviated by maximum medicine treatment at least 1 month
1 year after surgery
recurrence
Time Frame: 3 years after surgery
Recurrence was defined if the patient had symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis after surgery, and nasal endoscopy found nasal polyps recurrence, obvious edema of mucosa, or purulent secretion, and above of symptoms or physical signs existed, which can't be alleviated by maximum medicine treatment at least 1 month
3 years after surgery
recurrence
Time Frame: 5 years after surgery
Recurrence was defined if the patient had symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis after surgery, and nasal endoscopy found nasal polyps recurrence, obvious edema of mucosa, or purulent secretion, and above of symptoms or physical signs existed, which can't be alleviated by maximum medicine treatment at least 1 month
5 years after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogue scale of 4 major clinical symptoms
Time Frame: at baseline, and 1 year, 3years, 5 years after surgery
Subjective symptoms were scored on a visual analogue scale of 0 to 10 as previously described, with 0 being no complaints whatsoever and 10 being the worst imaginable. Four major symptoms include nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, loss of smell, and headache and/or facial pain.
at baseline, and 1 year, 3years, 5 years after surgery
Sinus-specific quality of life (QoL)
Time Frame: at baseline, and 1 year, 3years, 5 years after surgery
Sinus-specific quality of life (QoL) was assessed using the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22)
at baseline, and 1 year, 3years, 5 years after surgery
Postoperatively endoscopic results
Time Frame: at baseline, and 1 year, 3years, 5 years after surgery
Postoperatively endoscopic results were scored according to the Lund-Kennedy system, with the assessment of edema, nasal discharge, scarring, and crusting
at baseline, and 1 year, 3years, 5 years after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Rhinosinusitis (Diagnosis)

Clinical Trials on radical endoscopic sinus surgery (RESS) plus Draf 3 surgery.

3
Subscribe