GDPE/CEOPE Compared With CEOPE for Newly Diagnosed Patients With PTCL

March 19, 2019 updated by: Wang Xin, Shandong Provincial Hospital

GDPE/CEOPE Compared With CEOPE as the First-line Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Patients With Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma

Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL) is a heterogenic malignancy with poor outcome. There is no standardized treatment protocol for this kind of lymphoma. So, clinical trials are encouraged by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) for those patients. Former studies confirmed that GDP (Gemcitabine, Dexamethasone, and Cis-platinum) is superior with CHOP (Cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, Vincristine, and Prednisone). Combination with etoposide can improve the outcome of some patients with high risk factors. The aim of our study is to compare the response and survival rate of GDPE/CEOPE (gemcitabine, cis-platinum, etoposide, and dexamethasone/cyclophosphamide, vincristine, pharmorubicin, etoposide, and prednisone) with those of CEOPE regimen, looking forward to its superiority in efficacy and safety for the newly diagnosed adult patients with PTCL.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL) is a heterogenic malignancy with poor outcome. Five-year PFS (progression-free survival) and OS (overall survival) for these patients received classic CHOP regimen is less than 30%. High-dose intensive chemotherapy doesn't demonstrate better response. At present, there is no standardized treatment protocol for this kind of lymphoma. So, clinical trials are encouraged by NCCN for those patients.

For the less efficacy of CHOP or CHOP-like regimen, multi-drug combination strategy has been the therapy tendency in PTCL. Zhang et al, reported that GDP compared with CHOP as the therapy strategy for PTCL-NOS (Not Otherwise Specified). The response rate was 78.57% in GDP group and 60.00% in CHOP group, respectively. DFS (disease-free survival) was 9.79 and 4.2 months in above two groups. They concluded that GDP is superior to CHOP. The main side-effect of two regimens is hematological toxicity. Combination with etoposide can improve the outcome of some patients with high risk factors. Furthermore, high-dose combined with ASCT (autologous stem cell transplantation) has been the first-line therapy for PTCL. Some refractory/relapsed patients with PTCL will benefit from allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. However, about 30% patients with PTCL have no chance to receive ASCT for multiple reasons. So, it is urgent to explore new combination-therapy regimen to improve the outcome for patients with PTCL.

The aim of our study is to compare the response and survival rate of GDPE/CEOPE (gemcitabine, cis-platinum, etoposide, and dexamethasone/cyclophosphamide, vincristine, pharmorubicin, etoposide, and prednisone) with those of CEOPE (/cyclophosphamide, vincristine, pharmorubicin, etoposide, and prednisone ) regimen, looking forward to its superiority in efficacy and safety for the newly diagnosed adult patients with PTCL.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Xin Wang
  • Phone Number: 8613370506886 8613370506886
  • Email: xinw007@126.com

Study Locations

    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China, 250014
        • Recruiting
        • Yujie MS JIANG
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 75 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Newly Diagnosed Patients with Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma, Not Otherwise Specified
  • Angioimmunoblastic T Cell Lymphoma
  • ALK-negative Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma
  • Enteropathy Associated T Cell Lymphoma
  • Subcutaneous Panniculitis Like T Cell Lymphoma
  • Acute T-cell Leukemia/Lymphoma

Exclusion Criteria:

  • woman in pregnancy or lactation
  • allergic to any intervention drug
  • unsuitable to the study due to severe complication
  • enrolled to other study during the past 6 months
  • NK/T lymphoma ALK-positive Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
test group
patients with PTCL who receive GDPE/CEOPE as the first-line therapy strategy
control group
patients with PTCL who receive CEOPE as the first-line therapy strategy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
RR
Time Frame: 1 year
Response Rate (including complete response & partial response)
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PFS
Time Frame: 1 year
progression free survival
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

April 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 31, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Gemcitabine-PTCL

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gemcitabine

3
Subscribe