- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03886545
Objective Assessment for Caregivers With Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders of the Shoulder (AWMSD)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSD) are "a set of peri-articular conditions that can affect various structures of the upper limbs, lower limbs and back: tendons, muscles, joints, nerves and the vascular system"(1). WMSD are a major public health problem both in France and internationally. Indeed, these disorders represent 85% of occupational diseases in France (2). Our research project focuses on WMSD-S representing 32% and 23% of these disorders in France (3) and Europe (4), respectively. These shoulder disorders lead to a decrease in the quality of life of workers (2) but also have direct (e.g. 50K € for shoulder tendinitis [ST]) and indirect (e.g. between 100K and 350K € for ST) costs (5).
To prevent WMSD-S, current recommendations encourage regular assessments and interventions at the workers workstation (e.g. biomechanical constraints, ergonomics, etc.) (6,7), their organisation (e. g. "job rotation"...) (8) and psycho-social factors (e. g. stress...) (9) related to work. WMSD-S), which account for 32% and 23% of these disorders in France and Europe, respectively. In order to prevent WMSD-S, the assessment and rehabilitation of workers' physical and functional capacities (PFC) (e.g. joint amplitude) may complement current interventions (e.g. ergonomics) in a novel manner.
It is believed that the assessment of PFC in workers suffering from WMSD-S is essential to better understand the origin of these disorders, and therefore to optimise their care (10) . To our knowledge, no clinical studies have analysed the interest of a protocol for the assessment of WMSD-S in caregivers. From this observation, the first part of this project would consist of a cohort study assessing the PFC of caregivers with WMSD-S, compared to those of healthy subjects matched in age and gender. This study would improve the understanding of the worker's physical and functional impairments; a fundamental aspect for the individualised person-focused interventions (i.e. rehabilitation), in addition to those carried out at the workstation level (i.e. ergonomics).
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Maxime GILLIAUX, PhD
- Phone Number: (0)232293008 0033
- Email: m.gilliaux@iflrs-lamusse.net
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Maxime HOURY, PT
- Phone Number: (0)232293008 0033
- Email: houry.mk.pt@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Saint-Sébastien-de-Morsent, France, 27180
- Recruiting
- Hôpital La Musse
-
Contact:
- Maxime Gilliaux, PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Two groups
- experimental group, caregivers with shoulder pain
- control group, healthy subjects without shoulder pain
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- For caregivers with shoulder pain, the inclusion criteria would be: aged between 18 and 65; being a caregiver in a hospital department and having WMSD-S, objectified by shoulder pain.
- For healthy subjects , the inclusion criteria would be : aged between 18 and 65 and no shoulder pain (0/10 on visual analogic scale) in the last 3 months, both at rest and during activity.
Exclusion Criteria:
- For caregivers with shoulder pain, The exclusion criterion would be any traumatic event not related to the professional activity that could impair the functionality of the upper limbs.
- For healthy subject, the exclusion criterion would be any injury to shoulder muscles or tendons.
- For both groups, the exclusion criteria would include smoking, being pregnant, and engaging in traumatic physical activity of the shoulder and any systemic disease or neurological injury.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Healthy subjects
|
Comparaison of physical and functional capacities between caregivers with work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the shoulder healthy subjects matched in age and gender;
|
caregivers with shoulder pain
|
Comparaison of physical and functional capacities between caregivers with work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the shoulder healthy subjects matched in age and gender;
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Amplitude
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
shoulder amplitude (in °) computed with inertial sensors
|
5 minutes
|
Speed
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
shoulder speed (in °/seconde) computed with inertial sensors
|
5 minutes
|
Smoothness
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
shoulder smoothness (peak speed/mean speed) computed with inertial sensors
|
5 minutes
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
surface electromyographs
Time Frame: 15 minutes
|
fatigability of shoulder muscles assessed using surface electromyographs
|
15 minutes
|
global dexterity
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
global manual dexterity quantified using the Box and Block Test
|
5 minutes
|
fine manual dexterity
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
fine manual dexterity quantified using Purdue Pegboard Test
|
5 minutes
|
activity limitations
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
activity limitations assessed using the "Patient-Specific Functional Scale" questionnaire
|
5 minutes
|
participation restrictions
Time Frame: 5 min
|
participation restrictions assessed using the "Quick Dash" questionnaire
|
5 min
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Sivan M, O'Connor RJ, Makower S, Levesley M, Bhakta B. Systematic review of outcome measures used in the evaluation of robot-assisted upper limb exercise in stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2011 Feb;43(3):181-9. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0674.
- Fayad F, Lefevre-Colau MM, Gautheron V, Mace Y, Fermanian J, Mayoux-Benhamou A, Roren A, Rannou F, Roby-Brami A, Revel M, Poiraudeau S. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the French version of the questionnaire Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand in shoulder disorders. Man Ther. 2009 Apr;14(2):206-12. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.01.013. Epub 2008 Apr 23.
- Hefford C, Abbott JH, Arnold R, Baxter GD. The patient-specific functional scale: validity, reliability, and responsiveness in patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal problems. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Feb;42(2):56-65. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3953. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
- DGAFP. Guide pratique-Démarche de prévention des troubles musculo-squelettiques.2015; 1-65.
- DIRECCTE de Normandie. Plan santé au travail 2016-2020 Normandie. oct 2017.
- INRS. Troubles musculosquelettiques (TMS). INRS; 2015.
- Schneider et al. OSH in figures: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders in the EU. 2010.
- ARS Haute-Normandie. Prévenir durablement les Troubles Musculo-Squelettiques. 2013
- Akkas O, Lee CH, Hu YH, Harris Adamson C, Rempel D, Radwin RG. Measuring exertion time, duty cycle and hand activity level for industrial tasks using computer vision. Ergonomics. 2017 Dec;60(12):1730-1738. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2017.1346208. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
- Ghasemi MS, Hosseinzadeh P, Zamani F, Ahmadpoor H, Dehghan N. Ergonomic design and evaluation of a diagnostic ultrasound transducer holder. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2017 Dec;23(4):519-523. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2016.1216763. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
- Padula RS, Comper MLC, Sparer EH, Dennerlein JT. Job rotation designed to prevent musculoskeletal disorders and control risk in manufacturing industries: A systematic review. Appl Ergon. 2017 Jan;58:386-397. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.07.018. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
- Pransky G, Robertson MM, Moon SD. Stress and work-related upper extremity disorders: implications for prevention and management. Am J Ind Med. 2002 May;41(5):443-55. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10040.
- Gutenbrunner C, Meyer T, Melvin J, Stucki G. Towards a conceptual description of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. J Rehabil Med. 2011 Sep;43(9):760-4. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0866.
- van den Noort JC, Wiertsema SH, Hekman KMC, Schonhuth CP, Dekker J, Harlaar J. Reliability and precision of 3D wireless measurement of scapular kinematics. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2014 Nov;52(11):921-931. doi: 10.1007/s11517-014-1186-2. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
- Krause DA, Neuger MD, Lambert KA, Johnson AE, DeVinny HA, Hollman JH. Effects of examiner strength on reliability of hip-strength testing using a handheld dynamometer. J Sport Rehabil. 2014 Feb;23(1):56-64. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2012-0070. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
- De Baets L, van der Straaten R, Matheve T, Timmermans A. Shoulder assessment according to the international classification of functioning by means of inertial sensor technologies: A systematic review. Gait Posture. 2017 Sep;57:278-294. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.06.025. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
- Seitz AL, Uhl TL. Reliability and minimal detectable change in scapulothoracic neuromuscular activity. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012 Dec;22(6):968-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.05.003. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- AWMSD
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Musculoskeletal Disorder
-
Wroclaw University of Health and Sport SciencesUniversity School of Physical Education, Krakow, PolandCompletedMusculoskeletal DisorderPoland
-
Laval UniversityCompletedMusculoskeletal DisorderCanada
-
Laval UniversityCompleted
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Ohio State UniversityEnrolling by invitationMusculoskeletal DisorderUnited States
-
Rosimeire Simprini PadulaUnknownMusculoskeletal Disorder of the NeckBrazil
-
Istituto Clinico HumanitasUnknownMusculoskeletal Disorder | Arthroplasty, Knee ReplacementItaly
-
Aultman Health FoundationCompletedThe Impact of a mHealth Application on Outpatient Physical Therapy HEP Adherence and Outcomes: A RCTOrthopedic Disorder | Musculoskeletal InjuryUnited States
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedMusculoskeletal Disorder of the NeckPakistan
-
VivaltisCEISO; Human PhysioNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Assessment of physical and functional capacities
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint PierreCompleted
-
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)Completed
-
Brugmann University HospitalCompletedElderly Patients With a Solid TumorBelgium
-
University Hospital, AngersUnknown
-
Bispebjerg HospitalCompletedSarcopenia | Muscle Loss | Length of StayDenmark
-
Vanderbilt UniversityVanderbilt University Medical CenterCompletedBrain Injuries | Dementia | Muscle Disorders | MyopathiesUnited States
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompletedLiver Transplant DisorderTurkey
-
Investigación en Hemofilia y FisioterapiaNot yet recruiting
-
Istinye UniversityEnrolling by invitationObesity | Physical Activity | Body Composition | Education | Professional RoleTurkey
-
Mansoura UniversityUnknown