Impact of Ultra-Early Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment in SAH (UEAT)

September 6, 2023 updated by: George KC Wong, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Assessment of the Impact of Ultra-Early Aneurysm Treatment on Outcomes in Patients With Poor Neurological Status After Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture

This is the first prospective study in Hong Kong that recruit patients with poor neurological status after intracranial aneurysm rupture in all seven public neurosurgical services in Hong Kong. This study assesses whether ultra-early aneurysm treatment improves outcomes in patients with poor neurological status after intracranial aneurysm rupture in Hong Kong. These data are essential to understand the impact of the disease and for future service development in Hong Kong.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Objectives:

  1. To evaluate outcomes in patients admitted with poor neurological status after intracranial aneurysm rupture in Hong Kong;
  2. To evaluate whether ultra-early aneurysm treatment improves outcomes in patients admitted with poor neurological status after intracranial aneurysm rupture.

Hypothesis to be tested: Ultra-early aneurysm treatment increases chance of favorable outcomes in in patients admitted with poor neurological status after intracranial aneurysm rupture.

Design and subjects: Prospective observational study to recruit consecutive poor grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients in the seven public neurosurgical services in Hong Kong.

Study instruments: Modified Rankin Scale, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Stroke-Specific Quality of Life, Short Form-36, Return to Work, and hospital resource utilization.

Groups: Ultra-early (within initial 24 hours) and non-ultra early aneurysm treatment.

Main outcome measures: Favorable outcome at six months. Data analysis and expected results: Comparisons are carried out with adjustments for age, sex, admission Glasgow Coma Scale, hypertension, and modality of aneurysm treatment with appropriate regression analyses.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

293

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, China
        • Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with intracranial aneurysm rupture (aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage/SAH) admitted to seven public neurosurgical services in Hong Kong

Description

The inclusion criteria for this study are:

  1. Adult patients (aged >18 years) with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage
  2. Admission into Hospital Authority neurosurgical services
  3. The Glasgow Coma Scale on admission ≤12 (World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Grade 4-5)

The exclusion criteria for this study are:

  1. Patients are likely to leave Hong Kong shortly after episode
  2. Patients (or next-of-kin as appropriate) refuse to participate into the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Ultra-early aneurysm treatment
Ultra-early aneurysm treatment is defined as definitive cerebral aneurysm treatment such as coiling or clipping within the initial twenty-four hours.
Non-ultra-early aneurysm treatment
Non-ultra-early aneurysm treatment is defined as definitive cerebral aneurysm treatment such as coiling or clipping after the initial twenty-four hours.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Rankin Scale
Time Frame: 6 months
Modified Rankin Scale (0-6): 0-2 favourable, 3-6 unfavourable, the minimum is 0, the maximum is 6, lower score is better
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6 months
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (0-30): 0-25 cognitive impairment, 26-30 normal cognition, higher score is better
1, 3, 6 months
Stroke-Specific Quality of Life
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6 months
Minimum is 1, maximum is 5, higher score is better
1, 3, 6 months
Short Form-36
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6 months
Minimum is 0, maximum is 100, higher score is better
1, 3, 6 months
Return-to-Work
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6 months
Return to Work: Yes or No, Work Hours and Nature, minimum work hour is 0, maximum work hour is 168 per week, longer work hour is better
1, 3, 6 months
Hospital Resource Utilization
Time Frame: 6 months
Hospital Costs in Hong Kong Dollars, minimum is 0, maximum is 10 million, lower cost is better
6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Aneurysm ultra-early treatment modality
Time Frame: 6 months
Modified Rankin Scale in subgroups of Microsurgical Treatment versus Endovascular Treatment, minimum is 0 and maximum is 6 and the lower the better
6 months
Neurological Status of Patients underwent Ultra-early Aneurysm Treatment
Time Frame: 6 months
Modified Rankin Scale in subgroups with WFNS Grade IV versus Patients with WFNS Grade V, minimum is 0 and maximum is 6 and the lower the better
6 months
Time of Ultra-early Aneurysm Treatment
Time Frame: 6 months
Modified Rankin Scale in subgroups with Aneurysm Treatment within 6 hours and between 6-24 hours, minimum is 0 and maximum is 6 and the lower the better
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: George KC Wong, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Subscribe