Point-of-Care Echocardiography With Assistance Technology

September 13, 2019 updated by: Sara Guttas

Study for Point-of-Care Echocardiography With Assistance Technology

Establish the effectiveness of the Bay Labs, Inc. EchoGPS software in enabling RNs to acquire echocardiograms. In this study an echocardiogram protocol using the EchoGPS interface with the Terason uSmart 3200t, an FDA 510(k)-cleared, commercially available ultrasound device will be performed. Participants will have two scans, one by a registered nurse (RN) using the Terason uSmart 3200t with EchoGPS (Study Exam) and one by a sonographer using the Reference Device without EchoGPS guidance (Control Exam), under the same protocol. Study is non-significant risk (NSR).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

To validate clinical use of Bay Labs, Inc. EchoGPS guidance software by registered nurses (RNs) with no prior scanning experience to acquire limited two-dimensional echocardiograms. In this study an echocardiogram protocol using the EchoGPS interface with the Terason uSmart 3200t, an FDA 510(k)-cleared, commercially available ultrasound device will be performed. Participants will have two scans, one by a registered nurse (RN) using the Terason uSmart 3200t with EchoGPS (Study Exam) and one by a sonographer using the Reference Device without EchoGPS guidance (Control Exam), under the same protocol. Study is non-significant risk (NSR).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

240

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern Medicine, Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55407
        • Minneapolis Heart Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All patients must meet the following inclusion criteria to participate in the study:

  • Patients scheduled for an echocardiographic examination
  • Patients ≥18 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients must NOT meet any of the following exclusion criteria to participate in the trial:

  • Unable to lie flat for study
  • Patients experiencing a known or suspected acute cardiac event
  • Patients with severe chest wall abnormalities
  • Patients who have undergone pneumonectomy
  • Patients unwilling or unable to give written informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients scheduled for an echocardiogram
Patients ≥18 years scheduled for an echocardiographic examination. This is a non-randomized, un-blinded, study in patients with an indication for an echocardiographic examination. Enrolled patients will be stratified into two groups based on known cardiac abnormalities to ensure a sufficient number of patients with cardiac abnormalities and into 3 strata of BMI: normal, overweight and obese.
STUDY SOFTWARE non-significant risk (NSR) Bay Labs EchoGPS software interfaced with the Terason uSmart 3200t FDA 510(k)-cleared, commercially available ultrasound EchoGPS software communicates with the ultrasound image formation engine of the 510(k)-cleared Terason uSmart 3200t through an application programming interface (API). EchoGPS will be used to provide visual guidance feedback to users during image acquisition. For this study, RNs will use EchoGPS to perform limited echocardiogram examinations.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Study-level Assessment
Time Frame: Up to 2 months from the completion of the study or when all expert cardiologists readers independently complete their assessments

The primary endpoints for the study are separate patient-level assessments of whether the patient study is of adequate image quality to make a qualitative visual assessment for a particular clinical parameter (ie., Yes/No). Expert cardiologist readers will independently provide assessments and they will be blinded to the assessments from the other readers as well as whether the images were acquired by an RN or sonographer.

The Outcome Measure will be reported as the percentage of patient studies for which the panel of cardiologist readers adjudicated as being of sufficient image quality to make a particular clinical assessment.

Up to 2 months from the completion of the study or when all expert cardiologists readers independently complete their assessments

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
View-level Assessment
Time Frame: Up to 2 months from the completion of the study or when all expert cardiologists readers independently complete their assessments
The Outcome Measure will be reported as the percentage of patient studies with diagnostic quality clip for a particular Standard View acquired in the study. Expert cardiologist readers will independently provide assessments and they will be blinded to the assessments from the other readers as well as whether the images were acquired by an RN or sonographer.
Up to 2 months from the completion of the study or when all expert cardiologists readers independently complete their assessments
Inter-User Variability (Primary Clinical Parameters)
Time Frame: Up to 2 months from the completion of the study or when all expert cardiologists readers independently complete their assessments
o Comparison of user variability for primary clinical parameters (measured as the coefficient variation for binary assessment of whether the study is of diagnostic quality to make a particular clinical assessment)
Up to 2 months from the completion of the study or when all expert cardiologists readers independently complete their assessments
Inter-User Variability (Acquisition Time)
Time Frame: Up to 2 months from the completion of the study or when all expert cardiologists readers independently complete their assessments
o View level acquisition time (minutes and seconds)
Up to 2 months from the completion of the study or when all expert cardiologists readers independently complete their assessments
Patient-Level Acquisition time
Time Frame: Up to 2 months from the completion of the study or when all expert cardiologists readers independently complete their assessments
o Patient level acquisition time (minutes and seconds)
Up to 2 months from the completion of the study or when all expert cardiologists readers independently complete their assessments
View-Level Acquisition time
Time Frame: Up to 2 months from the completion of the study or when all expert cardiologists readers independently complete their assessments
o View-level acquisition time (minutes and seconds)
Up to 2 months from the completion of the study or when all expert cardiologists readers independently complete their assessments
Comparison of study exam and control exam (View-Level Results)
Time Frame: Up to 2 months from the completion of the study or when all expert cardiologists readers independently complete their assessments
o Comparison of View level results measured as percent agreement of images with diagnostic quality
Up to 2 months from the completion of the study or when all expert cardiologists readers independently complete their assessments
Comparison of study exam and control exam (Patient-Level Results)
Time Frame: Up to 2 months from the completion of the study or when all expert cardiologists readers independently complete their assessments
o Comparison of patient level results measured as percent agreement of patient exams of sufficient quality to make a particular clinical assessment
Up to 2 months from the completion of the study or when all expert cardiologists readers independently complete their assessments
Comparison of study exam and control exam (Task-Based Assessment)
Time Frame: Up to 2 months from the completion of the study or when all expert cardiologists readers independently complete their assessments
o Comparison of qualitative assessments from study and control exam to assess whether cardiologists reach a similar decision with study exam images and control exam images
Up to 2 months from the completion of the study or when all expert cardiologists readers independently complete their assessments

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Akhil Narang, MD, Northwestern Medicine, Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 25, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 23, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 23, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 23, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 17, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EchoGPSPivotal1.0

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be made available to other researchers.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

N/A - IPD will not be made available to other researchers.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

N/A - IPD will not be made available to other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Disease

Clinical Trials on Diagnostic Test: Limited Echocardiogram

Subscribe