Zinc Supplement in Regorafenib Treated mCRC Patient (ZnCORRECT)

March 29, 2019 updated by: Yeh Chun-Nan, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Zinc Supplement in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Receiving Regorafenib: Phase II Prospective Randomized Trial

Phase II randomized trial to investigate whether supplementation of zinc decreases the incidence of HFSR that occurs after treatment of tyrosine kinase inhibitor, regorafenib.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is aimed to investigate the effect of zinc supplementation on improving regorafenib treatment safety and efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The difference in grade 2 or worse hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) incidence within the first 8 weeks of regorafenib treatment between two arms will be examined as the primary objective.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

65

Phase

  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with mCRC who have been previously treated with, or are not considered candidates for, other locally approved standard treatment(s) and for whom the decision has been made per investigator's routine treatment practice to prescribe regorafenib
  • Ability to understand and willingness to sign written Informed Consent Form (ICF)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients participating in an investigational program with interventions outside of routine clinical practice
  • Patients with baseline Zinc level above 120 ug/dL
  • Patients with known allergy to Zinc supplementation
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients who are unsuitable for study participation, based on investigator's discretion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Regorafenib treatment with Zn supplement
Patients enrolled in this arm received regorafenib with zinc supplementation to examine if zinc supplementation can decrease the incidence of grade 2 or higher HFSR.
regorafenib plus zinc gluconate
Zinc gluconate supplement
Active Comparator: Regorafenib treatment only
Patients enrolled in this arm received regorafenib without zinc supplementation, which is the standard treatment of patients of metastatic colorectal cancer who failed previous standard therapy.
regorafenib plus zinc gluconate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in grade 2 or worse HFSR incidence within the first 8 weeks of regorafenib treatment between mCRC patients who receive regorafenib treatment with or without zinc supplementation
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Percentages
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of zinc deficiency before and after regorafenib treatment at weeks 4
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Percentages
4 weeks
Percentage of zinc deficiency before and after regorafenib treatment at weeks 8
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Percentages
8 weeks
Percentage of regorafenib dose reduction
Time Frame: Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentages
Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Through study completion, estimated 2 years
months
Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Objective tumor response rate (ORR)
Time Frame: Through study completion, estimated 2 years
rate
Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Disease control rate (DCR)
Time Frame: Through study completion, estimated 2 years
rate
Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: Through study completion, estimated 2 years
months
Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Duration of treatment of regorafenib (DoT)
Time Frame: through study completion, estimated 2 years
months
through study completion, estimated 2 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of patients with clinically significant finding in physical examination results, as assessed by general appearance
Time Frame: Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentage
Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentage of patients with clinically significant finding in physical examination results, as assessed by HEENT (head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat)
Time Frame: Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentage
Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentage of patients with clinically significant finding in physical examination results, as assessed by mouth
Time Frame: Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentage
Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentage of patients with clinically significant finding in physical examination results, as assessed by skin
Time Frame: Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentage
Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentage of patients with clinically significant finding in physical examination results, as assessed by neck (thyroid gland included)
Time Frame: Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentage
Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentage of patients with clinically significant finding in physical examination results, as assessed by lymph nodes
Time Frame: Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentage
Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentage of patients with clinically important change in vital sign results from baseline, as assessed by systolic pressure
Time Frame: Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentage
Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentage of patients with clinically important change in vital sign results from baseline, as assessed by diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentage
Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentage of patients with clinically important change in vital sign results from baseline, as assessed by pulse rate
Time Frame: Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentage
Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentage of patients with clinically important change in vital sign results from baseline, as assessed by respiratory rate
Time Frame: Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentage
Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentage of patients with clinically important change in vital sign results from baseline, as assessed by body temperature
Time Frame: Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentage
Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentage of patients with significant changes from baseline in clinical laboratory test results, assessed by hematology panel
Time Frame: Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentage
Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentage of patients with significant changes from baseline in clinical laboratory test results, assessed by biochemistry panel
Time Frame: Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentage
Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentage of patients with adverse events (graded by NCI-CTCAE v4.03)
Time Frame: Through study completion, estimated 2 years
Percentage
Through study completion, estimated 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chun-Nan Yeh, MD, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colorectal Cancer Metastatic

Clinical Trials on Regorafenib

3
Subscribe