Evaluating New Surgical Technique in Management of Female Patients With Operable Multifocal Breast Cancer

July 15, 2020 updated by: mostafa mohamed elsayed, Alexandria University

Tailoring Surgical Management of Multifocal Breast Cancer:is There a Possibility

Multi-focal Breast Cancers(MFBC) still have undiscoverable Clinical Significance reflecting on a debatable surgical decision for this Category of breast cancer. A prospective study was conducted using certain surgical technique as a surgical treatment for female patients with operable breast cancer managed at the Surgical Oncology Unit, Alexandria University from May. 2017 to May2018 and will be followed for 3 Years.Analysis will be done to settle a paradigm for surgical management of Multi-focal Breast Cancer

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

  • Age at diagnosis: young patients are defined as younger than 35 years.
  • Surgical techniques: Preoperatively all patients will undergo physical examination of both breasts and axillae as well as bilateral mammograms and ultrasonography of both breasts. Histopathological diagnosis of cancer will be made prior to surgery. The planned procedure will be discussed. Different oncoplastic techniques will be utilized to achieve oncologically appropriate margins with either sentinel lymph node detection or axillary lymph node dissection according to the triple assessment of the patients . Surgical margins were determined by macroscopic and histologic examination of frozen sections of the breast specimens in the operating room. An adequate safety margin of 1cm was always insured. Breast remodeling will be done according to breast size, degree of ptosis and size of defect.
  • Tumor characteristics: size, nodal status, presence of lympho-vascular invasion, amount of intraductal component, tumor grade, margin status, hormone receptor, and Her2 neu status.
  • Margins will be regarded as negative when permanent histological examination found no ink on the tumor.
  • Postoperative surgical complications will be documented if happened; seroma formation, hematoma and or wound dehiscence.
  • Cosmetic outcome: The postoperative esthetic result will be evaluated asking the patients to rate the postoperative cosmetic result and their degree of satisfaction compared to the preoperative breast using a five-point scale (excellent, 5; good, 4; fair, 3; poor, 2;bad, 1). Objective assessment of the cosmetic result was done by two surgeons, rated on a visual analog scale from 1 (unacceptable result) to 10 (excellent result). Evaluation is based on 5 criteria, namely: breast symmetry, glandular tissue defects, nipple and areola reconstruction, scar quality and/or retraction, and the resultant breast shape. (14)
  • The occurrence of loco-regional recurrence or distant metastases during the follow-up period was recorded and considered as an end point for follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

114

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Alexandria, Egypt, 21500
        • Faculty of medicine ,Alexandria university

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all operable female patients affected with multifocal breast cancer

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inflammatory breast cancer
  • patients need receiving neoadjuvant therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: oncoplastic breast surgery
oncoplastic breast surgery with level 1 or 2 according to the case using intra operative frozen section to assess the margin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrence of the Tumor
Time Frame: a median of 30 months post operative

assessment of the occurrence of local or distant recurrence through:

  1. monthly clinical examination of both breast and axillae
  2. monthly liver functions tests and complete blood count
  3. radiological assessment if clinically indicated
a median of 30 months post operative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cosmetic Result
Time Frame: a median of 30 months post operative

assessment of breast cosmesis after oncoplastic surgical intervention.Evaluation is based on 5 criteria, namely: breast symmetry, glandular tissue defects, nipple and areola reconstruction, scar quality and/or retraction, and the resultant breast shape.

each criteria will be evaluated either satisfactory or not,satisfactory evaluation will represent 1 point.

unsatisfactory will represent 0 point excellent result is equal or more than 4 points good result is equal to 3 points fair result is equal to 2 points bad result is equal to 1 point or less

a median of 30 months post operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ahmed T. Awad, MD, professor of surgical oncology,Alexandria university
  • Principal Investigator: Mostafa M. Elsayed, Msc, Surgical oncology registrar,Alexandria university

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • multifocal breast cancer2018

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

IPD will be available that underlie results in a publication

IPD Sharing Time Frame

will be available for 1 year after publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

individual participant data will be available to every researcher in field of multi -focal breast cancer, the candidate should have an accepted protocol from the ethical committee of the organization. contacting the main investigator will be method to review the request

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Study Data/Documents

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on oncoplastic breast surgery

Subscribe